Turning tangent theorem
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Someone knows where can I find the proof of the following theorem?
Let be $S$ a surface in $mathbbR^3$ and $R subset S$ a simply connected region. Let be $(e_1, e_2, e_3)$ an adapted frame defined on R (which changes as $P in R$ changes). Let be $phi$ the 1-form which measures the "infinitesimal angle" (or the change of angle) between $e_1$ and the unit tangent vector of $partial ^+R$. Then
$int _partial ^+Rphi = 2pi$
I know that it is similar to the theorem for plane curves, but there you have a fixed frame of $mathbbR^2$, here you have a moving frame on the surface.
Thanks in advance
differential-geometry differential-topology differential-forms
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Someone knows where can I find the proof of the following theorem?
Let be $S$ a surface in $mathbbR^3$ and $R subset S$ a simply connected region. Let be $(e_1, e_2, e_3)$ an adapted frame defined on R (which changes as $P in R$ changes). Let be $phi$ the 1-form which measures the "infinitesimal angle" (or the change of angle) between $e_1$ and the unit tangent vector of $partial ^+R$. Then
$int _partial ^+Rphi = 2pi$
I know that it is similar to the theorem for plane curves, but there you have a fixed frame of $mathbbR^2$, here you have a moving frame on the surface.
Thanks in advance
differential-geometry differential-topology differential-forms
Does "adapted frame" mean $TR = mathrmspan(e_1,e_2)?$
– Anthony Carapetis
Jul 16 at 11:18
Yes! And $e_3$ normal to surface. And ortonormal
– Marco All-in Nervo
Jul 16 at 12:38
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Someone knows where can I find the proof of the following theorem?
Let be $S$ a surface in $mathbbR^3$ and $R subset S$ a simply connected region. Let be $(e_1, e_2, e_3)$ an adapted frame defined on R (which changes as $P in R$ changes). Let be $phi$ the 1-form which measures the "infinitesimal angle" (or the change of angle) between $e_1$ and the unit tangent vector of $partial ^+R$. Then
$int _partial ^+Rphi = 2pi$
I know that it is similar to the theorem for plane curves, but there you have a fixed frame of $mathbbR^2$, here you have a moving frame on the surface.
Thanks in advance
differential-geometry differential-topology differential-forms
Someone knows where can I find the proof of the following theorem?
Let be $S$ a surface in $mathbbR^3$ and $R subset S$ a simply connected region. Let be $(e_1, e_2, e_3)$ an adapted frame defined on R (which changes as $P in R$ changes). Let be $phi$ the 1-form which measures the "infinitesimal angle" (or the change of angle) between $e_1$ and the unit tangent vector of $partial ^+R$. Then
$int _partial ^+Rphi = 2pi$
I know that it is similar to the theorem for plane curves, but there you have a fixed frame of $mathbbR^2$, here you have a moving frame on the surface.
Thanks in advance
differential-geometry differential-topology differential-forms
asked Jul 15 at 22:55
Marco All-in Nervo
1128
1128
Does "adapted frame" mean $TR = mathrmspan(e_1,e_2)?$
– Anthony Carapetis
Jul 16 at 11:18
Yes! And $e_3$ normal to surface. And ortonormal
– Marco All-in Nervo
Jul 16 at 12:38
add a comment |Â
Does "adapted frame" mean $TR = mathrmspan(e_1,e_2)?$
– Anthony Carapetis
Jul 16 at 11:18
Yes! And $e_3$ normal to surface. And ortonormal
– Marco All-in Nervo
Jul 16 at 12:38
Does "adapted frame" mean $TR = mathrmspan(e_1,e_2)?$
– Anthony Carapetis
Jul 16 at 11:18
Does "adapted frame" mean $TR = mathrmspan(e_1,e_2)?$
– Anthony Carapetis
Jul 16 at 11:18
Yes! And $e_3$ normal to surface. And ortonormal
– Marco All-in Nervo
Jul 16 at 12:38
Yes! And $e_3$ normal to surface. And ortonormal
– Marco All-in Nervo
Jul 16 at 12:38
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2852915%2fturning-tangent-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Does "adapted frame" mean $TR = mathrmspan(e_1,e_2)?$
– Anthony Carapetis
Jul 16 at 11:18
Yes! And $e_3$ normal to surface. And ortonormal
– Marco All-in Nervo
Jul 16 at 12:38