Binding eigenvalue properties with normal operators

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Let $N$ be a normal transformation over $Bbb C$.



A) True/False:$$N = N^* LeftarrowRightarrow lambda in Bbb R$$
(where $lambda$ is any eigenvalue of $N$)



B) True/False:$$N^* = N^-1 LeftarrowRightarrow |lambda|=1$$
(where $lambda$ is any eigenvalue of $N$)




In both cases, I am able to prove the direction $Rightarrow$ quite easily.
but in the other direction i am having a struggle (perhaps its false?).



for ex. statement B: I thought of showing that since $N$ is normal, then it is diagonalizable, therefore $N^*$ is also diagonalizable with the conjugate eigenvalues on its diagonal, therefore for any $lambda = (a+bi)$ then $NN^*$ has $(a+bi)(a-bi)$ on its diagonal, which is the identity matrix (since $|lambda|=1$) and therefore $N$ is unitary, but i'm not sure my transitions are valid.



Anyway, any help much appreciated on both statements!







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $N$ be a normal transformation over $Bbb C$.



    A) True/False:$$N = N^* LeftarrowRightarrow lambda in Bbb R$$
    (where $lambda$ is any eigenvalue of $N$)



    B) True/False:$$N^* = N^-1 LeftarrowRightarrow |lambda|=1$$
    (where $lambda$ is any eigenvalue of $N$)




    In both cases, I am able to prove the direction $Rightarrow$ quite easily.
    but in the other direction i am having a struggle (perhaps its false?).



    for ex. statement B: I thought of showing that since $N$ is normal, then it is diagonalizable, therefore $N^*$ is also diagonalizable with the conjugate eigenvalues on its diagonal, therefore for any $lambda = (a+bi)$ then $NN^*$ has $(a+bi)(a-bi)$ on its diagonal, which is the identity matrix (since $|lambda|=1$) and therefore $N$ is unitary, but i'm not sure my transitions are valid.



    Anyway, any help much appreciated on both statements!







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $N$ be a normal transformation over $Bbb C$.



      A) True/False:$$N = N^* LeftarrowRightarrow lambda in Bbb R$$
      (where $lambda$ is any eigenvalue of $N$)



      B) True/False:$$N^* = N^-1 LeftarrowRightarrow |lambda|=1$$
      (where $lambda$ is any eigenvalue of $N$)




      In both cases, I am able to prove the direction $Rightarrow$ quite easily.
      but in the other direction i am having a struggle (perhaps its false?).



      for ex. statement B: I thought of showing that since $N$ is normal, then it is diagonalizable, therefore $N^*$ is also diagonalizable with the conjugate eigenvalues on its diagonal, therefore for any $lambda = (a+bi)$ then $NN^*$ has $(a+bi)(a-bi)$ on its diagonal, which is the identity matrix (since $|lambda|=1$) and therefore $N$ is unitary, but i'm not sure my transitions are valid.



      Anyway, any help much appreciated on both statements!







      share|cite|improve this question











      Let $N$ be a normal transformation over $Bbb C$.



      A) True/False:$$N = N^* LeftarrowRightarrow lambda in Bbb R$$
      (where $lambda$ is any eigenvalue of $N$)



      B) True/False:$$N^* = N^-1 LeftarrowRightarrow |lambda|=1$$
      (where $lambda$ is any eigenvalue of $N$)




      In both cases, I am able to prove the direction $Rightarrow$ quite easily.
      but in the other direction i am having a struggle (perhaps its false?).



      for ex. statement B: I thought of showing that since $N$ is normal, then it is diagonalizable, therefore $N^*$ is also diagonalizable with the conjugate eigenvalues on its diagonal, therefore for any $lambda = (a+bi)$ then $NN^*$ has $(a+bi)(a-bi)$ on its diagonal, which is the identity matrix (since $|lambda|=1$) and therefore $N$ is unitary, but i'm not sure my transitions are valid.



      Anyway, any help much appreciated on both statements!









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 30 at 12:20









      Limitless

      986




      986




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Since $N$ is a normal $n times n$ - matrix, there is a unitary matrix $U$ such that $N=UDU^*$ , where $D=diag (lambda_1,..., lambda_n)$ and the $ lambda_k$ are the eigenvalues of $N$.



          A) if all $ lambda_k$ are real, then $D^*=D$, hence $N^*=UD^*U^*=UDU^*=N$.



          B) if for all $ lambda_k$ we have $|lambda_k|=1$, then $overlinelambda_k= frac1lambda_k$, thus $N^*=UD^*U^*=UD^-1U^*=N^-1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            A): Since $mathcal N$ is normal, there is a eigenbasis $(e_j)$ of the vector space. Since $(mathcal N - mathcal N^*)e_j = (lambda - lambda) e_j = 0$ for all $j = 1, ldots, n$ [assuming the vector space $V$ has dimension $n < infty$]. Hence
            $$
            mathcal Nx = mathcal N^*x
            $$
            for all $x in V$, i.e. $mathcal N = mathcal N^*$.



            B) If $|lambda| = 1$, then applied the operator $mathcal Nmathcal N^*$ to $e_j$ gives
            $$
            mathcal N mathcal N^* e_j = mathcal N (overline lambda e_j) = lambda overline lambda e_j = e_jquad [j = 1, ldots, n].
            $$
            Thus $mathcal N mathcal N^* = mathcal I$ [the identical mapping].



            P.S. the symbol $iff$ is available as "iff" .






            share|cite|improve this answer























              Your Answer




              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: false,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );








               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2866963%2fbinding-eigenvalue-properties-with-normal-operators%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest






























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              2
              down vote



              accepted










              Since $N$ is a normal $n times n$ - matrix, there is a unitary matrix $U$ such that $N=UDU^*$ , where $D=diag (lambda_1,..., lambda_n)$ and the $ lambda_k$ are the eigenvalues of $N$.



              A) if all $ lambda_k$ are real, then $D^*=D$, hence $N^*=UD^*U^*=UDU^*=N$.



              B) if for all $ lambda_k$ we have $|lambda_k|=1$, then $overlinelambda_k= frac1lambda_k$, thus $N^*=UD^*U^*=UD^-1U^*=N^-1$.






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted










                Since $N$ is a normal $n times n$ - matrix, there is a unitary matrix $U$ such that $N=UDU^*$ , where $D=diag (lambda_1,..., lambda_n)$ and the $ lambda_k$ are the eigenvalues of $N$.



                A) if all $ lambda_k$ are real, then $D^*=D$, hence $N^*=UD^*U^*=UDU^*=N$.



                B) if for all $ lambda_k$ we have $|lambda_k|=1$, then $overlinelambda_k= frac1lambda_k$, thus $N^*=UD^*U^*=UD^-1U^*=N^-1$.






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote



                  accepted







                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote



                  accepted






                  Since $N$ is a normal $n times n$ - matrix, there is a unitary matrix $U$ such that $N=UDU^*$ , where $D=diag (lambda_1,..., lambda_n)$ and the $ lambda_k$ are the eigenvalues of $N$.



                  A) if all $ lambda_k$ are real, then $D^*=D$, hence $N^*=UD^*U^*=UDU^*=N$.



                  B) if for all $ lambda_k$ we have $|lambda_k|=1$, then $overlinelambda_k= frac1lambda_k$, thus $N^*=UD^*U^*=UD^-1U^*=N^-1$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer













                  Since $N$ is a normal $n times n$ - matrix, there is a unitary matrix $U$ such that $N=UDU^*$ , where $D=diag (lambda_1,..., lambda_n)$ and the $ lambda_k$ are the eigenvalues of $N$.



                  A) if all $ lambda_k$ are real, then $D^*=D$, hence $N^*=UD^*U^*=UDU^*=N$.



                  B) if for all $ lambda_k$ we have $|lambda_k|=1$, then $overlinelambda_k= frac1lambda_k$, thus $N^*=UD^*U^*=UD^-1U^*=N^-1$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer













                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  answered Jul 30 at 12:40









                  Fred

                  37k1237




                  37k1237




















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      A): Since $mathcal N$ is normal, there is a eigenbasis $(e_j)$ of the vector space. Since $(mathcal N - mathcal N^*)e_j = (lambda - lambda) e_j = 0$ for all $j = 1, ldots, n$ [assuming the vector space $V$ has dimension $n < infty$]. Hence
                      $$
                      mathcal Nx = mathcal N^*x
                      $$
                      for all $x in V$, i.e. $mathcal N = mathcal N^*$.



                      B) If $|lambda| = 1$, then applied the operator $mathcal Nmathcal N^*$ to $e_j$ gives
                      $$
                      mathcal N mathcal N^* e_j = mathcal N (overline lambda e_j) = lambda overline lambda e_j = e_jquad [j = 1, ldots, n].
                      $$
                      Thus $mathcal N mathcal N^* = mathcal I$ [the identical mapping].



                      P.S. the symbol $iff$ is available as "iff" .






                      share|cite|improve this answer



























                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        A): Since $mathcal N$ is normal, there is a eigenbasis $(e_j)$ of the vector space. Since $(mathcal N - mathcal N^*)e_j = (lambda - lambda) e_j = 0$ for all $j = 1, ldots, n$ [assuming the vector space $V$ has dimension $n < infty$]. Hence
                        $$
                        mathcal Nx = mathcal N^*x
                        $$
                        for all $x in V$, i.e. $mathcal N = mathcal N^*$.



                        B) If $|lambda| = 1$, then applied the operator $mathcal Nmathcal N^*$ to $e_j$ gives
                        $$
                        mathcal N mathcal N^* e_j = mathcal N (overline lambda e_j) = lambda overline lambda e_j = e_jquad [j = 1, ldots, n].
                        $$
                        Thus $mathcal N mathcal N^* = mathcal I$ [the identical mapping].



                        P.S. the symbol $iff$ is available as "iff" .






                        share|cite|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote









                          A): Since $mathcal N$ is normal, there is a eigenbasis $(e_j)$ of the vector space. Since $(mathcal N - mathcal N^*)e_j = (lambda - lambda) e_j = 0$ for all $j = 1, ldots, n$ [assuming the vector space $V$ has dimension $n < infty$]. Hence
                          $$
                          mathcal Nx = mathcal N^*x
                          $$
                          for all $x in V$, i.e. $mathcal N = mathcal N^*$.



                          B) If $|lambda| = 1$, then applied the operator $mathcal Nmathcal N^*$ to $e_j$ gives
                          $$
                          mathcal N mathcal N^* e_j = mathcal N (overline lambda e_j) = lambda overline lambda e_j = e_jquad [j = 1, ldots, n].
                          $$
                          Thus $mathcal N mathcal N^* = mathcal I$ [the identical mapping].



                          P.S. the symbol $iff$ is available as "iff" .






                          share|cite|improve this answer















                          A): Since $mathcal N$ is normal, there is a eigenbasis $(e_j)$ of the vector space. Since $(mathcal N - mathcal N^*)e_j = (lambda - lambda) e_j = 0$ for all $j = 1, ldots, n$ [assuming the vector space $V$ has dimension $n < infty$]. Hence
                          $$
                          mathcal Nx = mathcal N^*x
                          $$
                          for all $x in V$, i.e. $mathcal N = mathcal N^*$.



                          B) If $|lambda| = 1$, then applied the operator $mathcal Nmathcal N^*$ to $e_j$ gives
                          $$
                          mathcal N mathcal N^* e_j = mathcal N (overline lambda e_j) = lambda overline lambda e_j = e_jquad [j = 1, ldots, n].
                          $$
                          Thus $mathcal N mathcal N^* = mathcal I$ [the identical mapping].



                          P.S. the symbol $iff$ is available as "iff" .







                          share|cite|improve this answer















                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited Jul 30 at 12:53


























                          answered Jul 30 at 12:44









                          xbh

                          1,0257




                          1,0257






















                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded


























                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2866963%2fbinding-eigenvalue-properties-with-normal-operators%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest













































































                              Comments

                              Popular posts from this blog

                              What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                              Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                              Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?