Bockstein homomorphim and obstruction of spin-c structure

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
2












Bockstein homomorphim and obstruction of spin-c structure: Let $w_2$ be the Stiefel Whintney class of manifold $M$. Let the Bockstein homomorphim $beta$ be the
$$
H^2(mathbbZ_2,M) to H^3(mathbbZ,M),
$$
such that $beta(w_2)$ is the integral cohomology class.




Is this true that for certain dimensions of $M=M^d$, say $d=5$, the existence of such a nontrivial $beta(w_2)$ indicates the obstruction of the spin$^c$ structure of $M$? How do we show this?








share|cite|improve this question















  • 1




    $SU(3)/SO(3)$ (called the Wu manifold) is a 5-dimensional example of this.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 19 at 16:17










  • Thanks, can you be more explicit? You mean it is an obstruction, only in 5d?
    – annie heart
    Jul 19 at 16:19






  • 1




    An oriented vector bundle $E$ has a $textspin^c$ structure iff $beta w_2(E) = 0$. You can prove this via obstruction theory, as one possible approach. This is just a fact for all vector bundles over (paracompact) spaces. Now, if $E = TM$, this automatically vanishes for dimensions up to 4 - for easy reasons when the dimension is at most 3. See here for dimension 4. The Wu manifold is a simple 5-manifold that does not carry a spin^c structure, showing these arguments don't generalize.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 19 at 16:29











  • Wu x torus is also not spin^c, so you would get examples in any higher dimension.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 19 at 16:32






  • 2




    I believe that is spin when N is even, and is neither spin nor spin-c when N is odd. This seems to be a difficult calculation. If you have some specific reason to care about whether that manifold is spin-c I can write up the calculation as an answer to a separate question.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 22 at 11:21














up vote
0
down vote

favorite
2












Bockstein homomorphim and obstruction of spin-c structure: Let $w_2$ be the Stiefel Whintney class of manifold $M$. Let the Bockstein homomorphim $beta$ be the
$$
H^2(mathbbZ_2,M) to H^3(mathbbZ,M),
$$
such that $beta(w_2)$ is the integral cohomology class.




Is this true that for certain dimensions of $M=M^d$, say $d=5$, the existence of such a nontrivial $beta(w_2)$ indicates the obstruction of the spin$^c$ structure of $M$? How do we show this?








share|cite|improve this question















  • 1




    $SU(3)/SO(3)$ (called the Wu manifold) is a 5-dimensional example of this.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 19 at 16:17










  • Thanks, can you be more explicit? You mean it is an obstruction, only in 5d?
    – annie heart
    Jul 19 at 16:19






  • 1




    An oriented vector bundle $E$ has a $textspin^c$ structure iff $beta w_2(E) = 0$. You can prove this via obstruction theory, as one possible approach. This is just a fact for all vector bundles over (paracompact) spaces. Now, if $E = TM$, this automatically vanishes for dimensions up to 4 - for easy reasons when the dimension is at most 3. See here for dimension 4. The Wu manifold is a simple 5-manifold that does not carry a spin^c structure, showing these arguments don't generalize.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 19 at 16:29











  • Wu x torus is also not spin^c, so you would get examples in any higher dimension.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 19 at 16:32






  • 2




    I believe that is spin when N is even, and is neither spin nor spin-c when N is odd. This seems to be a difficult calculation. If you have some specific reason to care about whether that manifold is spin-c I can write up the calculation as an answer to a separate question.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 22 at 11:21












up vote
0
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
0
down vote

favorite
2






2





Bockstein homomorphim and obstruction of spin-c structure: Let $w_2$ be the Stiefel Whintney class of manifold $M$. Let the Bockstein homomorphim $beta$ be the
$$
H^2(mathbbZ_2,M) to H^3(mathbbZ,M),
$$
such that $beta(w_2)$ is the integral cohomology class.




Is this true that for certain dimensions of $M=M^d$, say $d=5$, the existence of such a nontrivial $beta(w_2)$ indicates the obstruction of the spin$^c$ structure of $M$? How do we show this?








share|cite|improve this question











Bockstein homomorphim and obstruction of spin-c structure: Let $w_2$ be the Stiefel Whintney class of manifold $M$. Let the Bockstein homomorphim $beta$ be the
$$
H^2(mathbbZ_2,M) to H^3(mathbbZ,M),
$$
such that $beta(w_2)$ is the integral cohomology class.




Is this true that for certain dimensions of $M=M^d$, say $d=5$, the existence of such a nontrivial $beta(w_2)$ indicates the obstruction of the spin$^c$ structure of $M$? How do we show this?










share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked Jul 19 at 15:53









annie heart

549616




549616







  • 1




    $SU(3)/SO(3)$ (called the Wu manifold) is a 5-dimensional example of this.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 19 at 16:17










  • Thanks, can you be more explicit? You mean it is an obstruction, only in 5d?
    – annie heart
    Jul 19 at 16:19






  • 1




    An oriented vector bundle $E$ has a $textspin^c$ structure iff $beta w_2(E) = 0$. You can prove this via obstruction theory, as one possible approach. This is just a fact for all vector bundles over (paracompact) spaces. Now, if $E = TM$, this automatically vanishes for dimensions up to 4 - for easy reasons when the dimension is at most 3. See here for dimension 4. The Wu manifold is a simple 5-manifold that does not carry a spin^c structure, showing these arguments don't generalize.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 19 at 16:29











  • Wu x torus is also not spin^c, so you would get examples in any higher dimension.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 19 at 16:32






  • 2




    I believe that is spin when N is even, and is neither spin nor spin-c when N is odd. This seems to be a difficult calculation. If you have some specific reason to care about whether that manifold is spin-c I can write up the calculation as an answer to a separate question.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 22 at 11:21












  • 1




    $SU(3)/SO(3)$ (called the Wu manifold) is a 5-dimensional example of this.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 19 at 16:17










  • Thanks, can you be more explicit? You mean it is an obstruction, only in 5d?
    – annie heart
    Jul 19 at 16:19






  • 1




    An oriented vector bundle $E$ has a $textspin^c$ structure iff $beta w_2(E) = 0$. You can prove this via obstruction theory, as one possible approach. This is just a fact for all vector bundles over (paracompact) spaces. Now, if $E = TM$, this automatically vanishes for dimensions up to 4 - for easy reasons when the dimension is at most 3. See here for dimension 4. The Wu manifold is a simple 5-manifold that does not carry a spin^c structure, showing these arguments don't generalize.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 19 at 16:29











  • Wu x torus is also not spin^c, so you would get examples in any higher dimension.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 19 at 16:32






  • 2




    I believe that is spin when N is even, and is neither spin nor spin-c when N is odd. This seems to be a difficult calculation. If you have some specific reason to care about whether that manifold is spin-c I can write up the calculation as an answer to a separate question.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 22 at 11:21







1




1




$SU(3)/SO(3)$ (called the Wu manifold) is a 5-dimensional example of this.
– Mike Miller
Jul 19 at 16:17




$SU(3)/SO(3)$ (called the Wu manifold) is a 5-dimensional example of this.
– Mike Miller
Jul 19 at 16:17












Thanks, can you be more explicit? You mean it is an obstruction, only in 5d?
– annie heart
Jul 19 at 16:19




Thanks, can you be more explicit? You mean it is an obstruction, only in 5d?
– annie heart
Jul 19 at 16:19




1




1




An oriented vector bundle $E$ has a $textspin^c$ structure iff $beta w_2(E) = 0$. You can prove this via obstruction theory, as one possible approach. This is just a fact for all vector bundles over (paracompact) spaces. Now, if $E = TM$, this automatically vanishes for dimensions up to 4 - for easy reasons when the dimension is at most 3. See here for dimension 4. The Wu manifold is a simple 5-manifold that does not carry a spin^c structure, showing these arguments don't generalize.
– Mike Miller
Jul 19 at 16:29





An oriented vector bundle $E$ has a $textspin^c$ structure iff $beta w_2(E) = 0$. You can prove this via obstruction theory, as one possible approach. This is just a fact for all vector bundles over (paracompact) spaces. Now, if $E = TM$, this automatically vanishes for dimensions up to 4 - for easy reasons when the dimension is at most 3. See here for dimension 4. The Wu manifold is a simple 5-manifold that does not carry a spin^c structure, showing these arguments don't generalize.
– Mike Miller
Jul 19 at 16:29













Wu x torus is also not spin^c, so you would get examples in any higher dimension.
– Mike Miller
Jul 19 at 16:32




Wu x torus is also not spin^c, so you would get examples in any higher dimension.
– Mike Miller
Jul 19 at 16:32




2




2




I believe that is spin when N is even, and is neither spin nor spin-c when N is odd. This seems to be a difficult calculation. If you have some specific reason to care about whether that manifold is spin-c I can write up the calculation as an answer to a separate question.
– Mike Miller
Jul 22 at 11:21




I believe that is spin when N is even, and is neither spin nor spin-c when N is odd. This seems to be a difficult calculation. If you have some specific reason to care about whether that manifold is spin-c I can write up the calculation as an answer to a separate question.
– Mike Miller
Jul 22 at 11:21















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2856770%2fbockstein-homomorphim-and-obstruction-of-spin-c-structure%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2856770%2fbockstein-homomorphim-and-obstruction-of-spin-c-structure%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?