Can growth ratio between convergent & divergent series be arbitrarily small?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












Given any increasing positive sequence $a_n$ diverging to infinity, is it possible to construct a non-negative sequence $b_n$ so that $b_n$ is summable but $a_n b_n$ is not? In other words, can we construct two series with arbitrarily small ratio growth but only one of them diverges?



(Edited) is it possible to find b_n so that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing?







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Given any increasing positive sequence $a_n$ diverging to infinity, is it possible to construct a non-negative sequence $b_n$ so that $b_n$ is summable but $a_n b_n$ is not? In other words, can we construct two series with arbitrarily small ratio growth but only one of them diverges?



    (Edited) is it possible to find b_n so that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing?







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Given any increasing positive sequence $a_n$ diverging to infinity, is it possible to construct a non-negative sequence $b_n$ so that $b_n$ is summable but $a_n b_n$ is not? In other words, can we construct two series with arbitrarily small ratio growth but only one of them diverges?



      (Edited) is it possible to find b_n so that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing?







      share|cite|improve this question













      Given any increasing positive sequence $a_n$ diverging to infinity, is it possible to construct a non-negative sequence $b_n$ so that $b_n$ is summable but $a_n b_n$ is not? In other words, can we construct two series with arbitrarily small ratio growth but only one of them diverges?



      (Edited) is it possible to find b_n so that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing?









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jul 18 at 9:41
























      asked Jul 18 at 7:51









      KingofHeadbutt

      162




      162




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          [This is not an answer to the question in the present form but it was a correct answer for the earlier version]. Choose $n_1<n_2<...$ such that $a_n_k >k$ Let $b_n=frac 1 ka_n$ if $n =n_k$ and $b_n=0$ if $n$ is not of the type $n_k$. Note that $sum a_nb_n =sum frac 1 k =infty$ and $sum b_n <sum frac 1 k^2 <infty $. If you want $b_n$'s to be strictly positive simply take $b_n=frac 1 n^2$ when $n$ is not of the type $n_k$.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • This answer may be tweaked to make $b_n$ strictly positive if one so wished (by, for instance, splitting the $frac1ka_n$ equally among the $b_n_k,ldots,b_n_k+1-1$), but that will be more cluttered as one can see just by looking at nested index I wrote there.
            – Arthur
            Jul 18 at 8:05







          • 1




            @Arthur see my edited answer.
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Jul 18 at 8:15










          • Oh, I was imagining problems which weren't there. Cool.
            – Arthur
            Jul 18 at 8:21











          • Thanks! However, I think I forgot one important condition that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing. Do you think it's still possible?
            – KingofHeadbutt
            Jul 18 at 8:42










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2855323%2fcan-growth-ratio-between-convergent-divergent-series-be-arbitrarily-small%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote













          [This is not an answer to the question in the present form but it was a correct answer for the earlier version]. Choose $n_1<n_2<...$ such that $a_n_k >k$ Let $b_n=frac 1 ka_n$ if $n =n_k$ and $b_n=0$ if $n$ is not of the type $n_k$. Note that $sum a_nb_n =sum frac 1 k =infty$ and $sum b_n <sum frac 1 k^2 <infty $. If you want $b_n$'s to be strictly positive simply take $b_n=frac 1 n^2$ when $n$ is not of the type $n_k$.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • This answer may be tweaked to make $b_n$ strictly positive if one so wished (by, for instance, splitting the $frac1ka_n$ equally among the $b_n_k,ldots,b_n_k+1-1$), but that will be more cluttered as one can see just by looking at nested index I wrote there.
            – Arthur
            Jul 18 at 8:05







          • 1




            @Arthur see my edited answer.
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Jul 18 at 8:15










          • Oh, I was imagining problems which weren't there. Cool.
            – Arthur
            Jul 18 at 8:21











          • Thanks! However, I think I forgot one important condition that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing. Do you think it's still possible?
            – KingofHeadbutt
            Jul 18 at 8:42














          up vote
          2
          down vote













          [This is not an answer to the question in the present form but it was a correct answer for the earlier version]. Choose $n_1<n_2<...$ such that $a_n_k >k$ Let $b_n=frac 1 ka_n$ if $n =n_k$ and $b_n=0$ if $n$ is not of the type $n_k$. Note that $sum a_nb_n =sum frac 1 k =infty$ and $sum b_n <sum frac 1 k^2 <infty $. If you want $b_n$'s to be strictly positive simply take $b_n=frac 1 n^2$ when $n$ is not of the type $n_k$.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • This answer may be tweaked to make $b_n$ strictly positive if one so wished (by, for instance, splitting the $frac1ka_n$ equally among the $b_n_k,ldots,b_n_k+1-1$), but that will be more cluttered as one can see just by looking at nested index I wrote there.
            – Arthur
            Jul 18 at 8:05







          • 1




            @Arthur see my edited answer.
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Jul 18 at 8:15










          • Oh, I was imagining problems which weren't there. Cool.
            – Arthur
            Jul 18 at 8:21











          • Thanks! However, I think I forgot one important condition that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing. Do you think it's still possible?
            – KingofHeadbutt
            Jul 18 at 8:42












          up vote
          2
          down vote










          up vote
          2
          down vote









          [This is not an answer to the question in the present form but it was a correct answer for the earlier version]. Choose $n_1<n_2<...$ such that $a_n_k >k$ Let $b_n=frac 1 ka_n$ if $n =n_k$ and $b_n=0$ if $n$ is not of the type $n_k$. Note that $sum a_nb_n =sum frac 1 k =infty$ and $sum b_n <sum frac 1 k^2 <infty $. If you want $b_n$'s to be strictly positive simply take $b_n=frac 1 n^2$ when $n$ is not of the type $n_k$.






          share|cite|improve this answer















          [This is not an answer to the question in the present form but it was a correct answer for the earlier version]. Choose $n_1<n_2<...$ such that $a_n_k >k$ Let $b_n=frac 1 ka_n$ if $n =n_k$ and $b_n=0$ if $n$ is not of the type $n_k$. Note that $sum a_nb_n =sum frac 1 k =infty$ and $sum b_n <sum frac 1 k^2 <infty $. If you want $b_n$'s to be strictly positive simply take $b_n=frac 1 n^2$ when $n$ is not of the type $n_k$.







          share|cite|improve this answer















          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jul 18 at 8:59


























          answered Jul 18 at 8:00









          Kavi Rama Murthy

          20.8k2829




          20.8k2829











          • This answer may be tweaked to make $b_n$ strictly positive if one so wished (by, for instance, splitting the $frac1ka_n$ equally among the $b_n_k,ldots,b_n_k+1-1$), but that will be more cluttered as one can see just by looking at nested index I wrote there.
            – Arthur
            Jul 18 at 8:05







          • 1




            @Arthur see my edited answer.
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Jul 18 at 8:15










          • Oh, I was imagining problems which weren't there. Cool.
            – Arthur
            Jul 18 at 8:21











          • Thanks! However, I think I forgot one important condition that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing. Do you think it's still possible?
            – KingofHeadbutt
            Jul 18 at 8:42
















          • This answer may be tweaked to make $b_n$ strictly positive if one so wished (by, for instance, splitting the $frac1ka_n$ equally among the $b_n_k,ldots,b_n_k+1-1$), but that will be more cluttered as one can see just by looking at nested index I wrote there.
            – Arthur
            Jul 18 at 8:05







          • 1




            @Arthur see my edited answer.
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Jul 18 at 8:15










          • Oh, I was imagining problems which weren't there. Cool.
            – Arthur
            Jul 18 at 8:21











          • Thanks! However, I think I forgot one important condition that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing. Do you think it's still possible?
            – KingofHeadbutt
            Jul 18 at 8:42















          This answer may be tweaked to make $b_n$ strictly positive if one so wished (by, for instance, splitting the $frac1ka_n$ equally among the $b_n_k,ldots,b_n_k+1-1$), but that will be more cluttered as one can see just by looking at nested index I wrote there.
          – Arthur
          Jul 18 at 8:05





          This answer may be tweaked to make $b_n$ strictly positive if one so wished (by, for instance, splitting the $frac1ka_n$ equally among the $b_n_k,ldots,b_n_k+1-1$), but that will be more cluttered as one can see just by looking at nested index I wrote there.
          – Arthur
          Jul 18 at 8:05





          1




          1




          @Arthur see my edited answer.
          – Kavi Rama Murthy
          Jul 18 at 8:15




          @Arthur see my edited answer.
          – Kavi Rama Murthy
          Jul 18 at 8:15












          Oh, I was imagining problems which weren't there. Cool.
          – Arthur
          Jul 18 at 8:21





          Oh, I was imagining problems which weren't there. Cool.
          – Arthur
          Jul 18 at 8:21













          Thanks! However, I think I forgot one important condition that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing. Do you think it's still possible?
          – KingofHeadbutt
          Jul 18 at 8:42




          Thanks! However, I think I forgot one important condition that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing. Do you think it's still possible?
          – KingofHeadbutt
          Jul 18 at 8:42












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2855323%2fcan-growth-ratio-between-convergent-divergent-series-be-arbitrarily-small%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?