Can growth ratio between convergent & divergent series be arbitrarily small?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Given any increasing positive sequence $a_n$ diverging to infinity, is it possible to construct a non-negative sequence $b_n$ so that $b_n$ is summable but $a_n b_n$ is not? In other words, can we construct two series with arbitrarily small ratio growth but only one of them diverges?
(Edited) is it possible to find b_n so that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing?
sequences-and-series
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Given any increasing positive sequence $a_n$ diverging to infinity, is it possible to construct a non-negative sequence $b_n$ so that $b_n$ is summable but $a_n b_n$ is not? In other words, can we construct two series with arbitrarily small ratio growth but only one of them diverges?
(Edited) is it possible to find b_n so that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing?
sequences-and-series
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Given any increasing positive sequence $a_n$ diverging to infinity, is it possible to construct a non-negative sequence $b_n$ so that $b_n$ is summable but $a_n b_n$ is not? In other words, can we construct two series with arbitrarily small ratio growth but only one of them diverges?
(Edited) is it possible to find b_n so that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing?
sequences-and-series
Given any increasing positive sequence $a_n$ diverging to infinity, is it possible to construct a non-negative sequence $b_n$ so that $b_n$ is summable but $a_n b_n$ is not? In other words, can we construct two series with arbitrarily small ratio growth but only one of them diverges?
(Edited) is it possible to find b_n so that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing?
sequences-and-series
edited Jul 18 at 9:41
asked Jul 18 at 7:51
KingofHeadbutt
162
162
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
[This is not an answer to the question in the present form but it was a correct answer for the earlier version]. Choose $n_1<n_2<...$ such that $a_n_k >k$ Let $b_n=frac 1 ka_n$ if $n =n_k$ and $b_n=0$ if $n$ is not of the type $n_k$. Note that $sum a_nb_n =sum frac 1 k =infty$ and $sum b_n <sum frac 1 k^2 <infty $. If you want $b_n$'s to be strictly positive simply take $b_n=frac 1 n^2$ when $n$ is not of the type $n_k$.
This answer may be tweaked to make $b_n$ strictly positive if one so wished (by, for instance, splitting the $frac1ka_n$ equally among the $b_n_k,ldots,b_n_k+1-1$), but that will be more cluttered as one can see just by looking at nested index I wrote there.
– Arthur
Jul 18 at 8:05
1
@Arthur see my edited answer.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jul 18 at 8:15
Oh, I was imagining problems which weren't there. Cool.
– Arthur
Jul 18 at 8:21
Thanks! However, I think I forgot one important condition that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing. Do you think it's still possible?
– KingofHeadbutt
Jul 18 at 8:42
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
[This is not an answer to the question in the present form but it was a correct answer for the earlier version]. Choose $n_1<n_2<...$ such that $a_n_k >k$ Let $b_n=frac 1 ka_n$ if $n =n_k$ and $b_n=0$ if $n$ is not of the type $n_k$. Note that $sum a_nb_n =sum frac 1 k =infty$ and $sum b_n <sum frac 1 k^2 <infty $. If you want $b_n$'s to be strictly positive simply take $b_n=frac 1 n^2$ when $n$ is not of the type $n_k$.
This answer may be tweaked to make $b_n$ strictly positive if one so wished (by, for instance, splitting the $frac1ka_n$ equally among the $b_n_k,ldots,b_n_k+1-1$), but that will be more cluttered as one can see just by looking at nested index I wrote there.
– Arthur
Jul 18 at 8:05
1
@Arthur see my edited answer.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jul 18 at 8:15
Oh, I was imagining problems which weren't there. Cool.
– Arthur
Jul 18 at 8:21
Thanks! However, I think I forgot one important condition that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing. Do you think it's still possible?
– KingofHeadbutt
Jul 18 at 8:42
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
[This is not an answer to the question in the present form but it was a correct answer for the earlier version]. Choose $n_1<n_2<...$ such that $a_n_k >k$ Let $b_n=frac 1 ka_n$ if $n =n_k$ and $b_n=0$ if $n$ is not of the type $n_k$. Note that $sum a_nb_n =sum frac 1 k =infty$ and $sum b_n <sum frac 1 k^2 <infty $. If you want $b_n$'s to be strictly positive simply take $b_n=frac 1 n^2$ when $n$ is not of the type $n_k$.
This answer may be tweaked to make $b_n$ strictly positive if one so wished (by, for instance, splitting the $frac1ka_n$ equally among the $b_n_k,ldots,b_n_k+1-1$), but that will be more cluttered as one can see just by looking at nested index I wrote there.
– Arthur
Jul 18 at 8:05
1
@Arthur see my edited answer.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jul 18 at 8:15
Oh, I was imagining problems which weren't there. Cool.
– Arthur
Jul 18 at 8:21
Thanks! However, I think I forgot one important condition that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing. Do you think it's still possible?
– KingofHeadbutt
Jul 18 at 8:42
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
[This is not an answer to the question in the present form but it was a correct answer for the earlier version]. Choose $n_1<n_2<...$ such that $a_n_k >k$ Let $b_n=frac 1 ka_n$ if $n =n_k$ and $b_n=0$ if $n$ is not of the type $n_k$. Note that $sum a_nb_n =sum frac 1 k =infty$ and $sum b_n <sum frac 1 k^2 <infty $. If you want $b_n$'s to be strictly positive simply take $b_n=frac 1 n^2$ when $n$ is not of the type $n_k$.
[This is not an answer to the question in the present form but it was a correct answer for the earlier version]. Choose $n_1<n_2<...$ such that $a_n_k >k$ Let $b_n=frac 1 ka_n$ if $n =n_k$ and $b_n=0$ if $n$ is not of the type $n_k$. Note that $sum a_nb_n =sum frac 1 k =infty$ and $sum b_n <sum frac 1 k^2 <infty $. If you want $b_n$'s to be strictly positive simply take $b_n=frac 1 n^2$ when $n$ is not of the type $n_k$.
edited Jul 18 at 8:59
answered Jul 18 at 8:00


Kavi Rama Murthy
20.8k2829
20.8k2829
This answer may be tweaked to make $b_n$ strictly positive if one so wished (by, for instance, splitting the $frac1ka_n$ equally among the $b_n_k,ldots,b_n_k+1-1$), but that will be more cluttered as one can see just by looking at nested index I wrote there.
– Arthur
Jul 18 at 8:05
1
@Arthur see my edited answer.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jul 18 at 8:15
Oh, I was imagining problems which weren't there. Cool.
– Arthur
Jul 18 at 8:21
Thanks! However, I think I forgot one important condition that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing. Do you think it's still possible?
– KingofHeadbutt
Jul 18 at 8:42
add a comment |Â
This answer may be tweaked to make $b_n$ strictly positive if one so wished (by, for instance, splitting the $frac1ka_n$ equally among the $b_n_k,ldots,b_n_k+1-1$), but that will be more cluttered as one can see just by looking at nested index I wrote there.
– Arthur
Jul 18 at 8:05
1
@Arthur see my edited answer.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jul 18 at 8:15
Oh, I was imagining problems which weren't there. Cool.
– Arthur
Jul 18 at 8:21
Thanks! However, I think I forgot one important condition that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing. Do you think it's still possible?
– KingofHeadbutt
Jul 18 at 8:42
This answer may be tweaked to make $b_n$ strictly positive if one so wished (by, for instance, splitting the $frac1ka_n$ equally among the $b_n_k,ldots,b_n_k+1-1$), but that will be more cluttered as one can see just by looking at nested index I wrote there.
– Arthur
Jul 18 at 8:05
This answer may be tweaked to make $b_n$ strictly positive if one so wished (by, for instance, splitting the $frac1ka_n$ equally among the $b_n_k,ldots,b_n_k+1-1$), but that will be more cluttered as one can see just by looking at nested index I wrote there.
– Arthur
Jul 18 at 8:05
1
1
@Arthur see my edited answer.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jul 18 at 8:15
@Arthur see my edited answer.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jul 18 at 8:15
Oh, I was imagining problems which weren't there. Cool.
– Arthur
Jul 18 at 8:21
Oh, I was imagining problems which weren't there. Cool.
– Arthur
Jul 18 at 8:21
Thanks! However, I think I forgot one important condition that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing. Do you think it's still possible?
– KingofHeadbutt
Jul 18 at 8:42
Thanks! However, I think I forgot one important condition that b_n and a_n b_n are decreasing. Do you think it's still possible?
– KingofHeadbutt
Jul 18 at 8:42
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2855323%2fcan-growth-ratio-between-convergent-divergent-series-be-arbitrarily-small%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password