Characteristics of First-Order PDEs Example: How Was This Integration Done?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
From Essential Partial Differential Equations, by Griffiths, Dold, and Silvester:
Example 4.2 (Half-plane problem) Solve the PDE $pux + quy = f(x, y)$ (with $p$ and $q$ constant) in the domain $alpha x + beta y > 0$ given that $u = g(x)$ on the line $mathcall : alpha x + beta y = 0$, where $q > 0$ and $beta > 0$.
As in the previous example, the characteristic equations (4.4) are readily solved to give
$$x = pt + C_1, y = qt + C_2$$
where $C_1$ and $C_2$ are constant along any characteristic. The assumption $q > 0$ means that $y$ increases along a characteristic as $t$ increases -- thus the parameter $t$ may be viewed as a time-like variable. This is illustrated in Fig. 4.1 where the arrows on the characteristics indicate increasing t.
In order to determine the solution at a point $P(x, y)$, we trace the characteristic through this point backwards in $t$ until it intersects the line $mathcall$. We shall suppose that this occurs at the point $Q$ having coordinates $x = beta s$, $y = − alpha s$ when $t = 0$. Then, from (4.8), we find $C_1 = beta s$, $C_2 = − alpha s$. Here $s$ is a parameter that plays a role similar to that of $k$ in the previous example. It varies along the line l and each choice of s selects a different characteristic:
$$x = pt + beta s, y = qt − alpha s$$
Next we consider the last characteristic equation
$$fracdudt = f(x(s, t), y(s, t))$$
Integrating gives
$$u(s, t) = u(s, 0) + int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$$
Here $u(s, 0)$ is a constant along any characteristic but varies from one characteristic to another.
My question is, how did the author get
$$u(s, t) = u(s, 0) + int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$$
by integrating?
Where did the $u(s, 0)$ term come from? And how was $int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$ calculated by integration? For instance, I have never seen something written like $dt'$?
Thank you for any explanation you could offer.
real-analysis integration multivariable-calculus pde characteristics
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
From Essential Partial Differential Equations, by Griffiths, Dold, and Silvester:
Example 4.2 (Half-plane problem) Solve the PDE $pux + quy = f(x, y)$ (with $p$ and $q$ constant) in the domain $alpha x + beta y > 0$ given that $u = g(x)$ on the line $mathcall : alpha x + beta y = 0$, where $q > 0$ and $beta > 0$.
As in the previous example, the characteristic equations (4.4) are readily solved to give
$$x = pt + C_1, y = qt + C_2$$
where $C_1$ and $C_2$ are constant along any characteristic. The assumption $q > 0$ means that $y$ increases along a characteristic as $t$ increases -- thus the parameter $t$ may be viewed as a time-like variable. This is illustrated in Fig. 4.1 where the arrows on the characteristics indicate increasing t.
In order to determine the solution at a point $P(x, y)$, we trace the characteristic through this point backwards in $t$ until it intersects the line $mathcall$. We shall suppose that this occurs at the point $Q$ having coordinates $x = beta s$, $y = − alpha s$ when $t = 0$. Then, from (4.8), we find $C_1 = beta s$, $C_2 = − alpha s$. Here $s$ is a parameter that plays a role similar to that of $k$ in the previous example. It varies along the line l and each choice of s selects a different characteristic:
$$x = pt + beta s, y = qt − alpha s$$
Next we consider the last characteristic equation
$$fracdudt = f(x(s, t), y(s, t))$$
Integrating gives
$$u(s, t) = u(s, 0) + int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$$
Here $u(s, 0)$ is a constant along any characteristic but varies from one characteristic to another.
My question is, how did the author get
$$u(s, t) = u(s, 0) + int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$$
by integrating?
Where did the $u(s, 0)$ term come from? And how was $int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$ calculated by integration? For instance, I have never seen something written like $dt'$?
Thank you for any explanation you could offer.
real-analysis integration multivariable-calculus pde characteristics
Keep in mind that $t'$ doesn't denote a derivative- it's just another variable. It might help to replace it with something like $z$. You can apply the fundamental theorem of calculus to see that this solution satisfies the differential equation. You can also check that the formula has the correct value for $u(s,t)$ at the initial time $t=0$.
– Brian Borchers
Jul 30 at 18:41
What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of $u(s,0)$? What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of the integral in the second term?
– Brian Borchers
Jul 30 at 18:53
@BrianBorchers Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, the $u(s, 0)$ is from using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus! And $int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$ is from the part 1 fundamental theorem of calculus. Using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus, we get $u(s, t) - u(s, 0)$ for the left-hand side integration.
– handler's handle
Jul 31 at 2:05
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
From Essential Partial Differential Equations, by Griffiths, Dold, and Silvester:
Example 4.2 (Half-plane problem) Solve the PDE $pux + quy = f(x, y)$ (with $p$ and $q$ constant) in the domain $alpha x + beta y > 0$ given that $u = g(x)$ on the line $mathcall : alpha x + beta y = 0$, where $q > 0$ and $beta > 0$.
As in the previous example, the characteristic equations (4.4) are readily solved to give
$$x = pt + C_1, y = qt + C_2$$
where $C_1$ and $C_2$ are constant along any characteristic. The assumption $q > 0$ means that $y$ increases along a characteristic as $t$ increases -- thus the parameter $t$ may be viewed as a time-like variable. This is illustrated in Fig. 4.1 where the arrows on the characteristics indicate increasing t.
In order to determine the solution at a point $P(x, y)$, we trace the characteristic through this point backwards in $t$ until it intersects the line $mathcall$. We shall suppose that this occurs at the point $Q$ having coordinates $x = beta s$, $y = − alpha s$ when $t = 0$. Then, from (4.8), we find $C_1 = beta s$, $C_2 = − alpha s$. Here $s$ is a parameter that plays a role similar to that of $k$ in the previous example. It varies along the line l and each choice of s selects a different characteristic:
$$x = pt + beta s, y = qt − alpha s$$
Next we consider the last characteristic equation
$$fracdudt = f(x(s, t), y(s, t))$$
Integrating gives
$$u(s, t) = u(s, 0) + int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$$
Here $u(s, 0)$ is a constant along any characteristic but varies from one characteristic to another.
My question is, how did the author get
$$u(s, t) = u(s, 0) + int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$$
by integrating?
Where did the $u(s, 0)$ term come from? And how was $int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$ calculated by integration? For instance, I have never seen something written like $dt'$?
Thank you for any explanation you could offer.
real-analysis integration multivariable-calculus pde characteristics
From Essential Partial Differential Equations, by Griffiths, Dold, and Silvester:
Example 4.2 (Half-plane problem) Solve the PDE $pux + quy = f(x, y)$ (with $p$ and $q$ constant) in the domain $alpha x + beta y > 0$ given that $u = g(x)$ on the line $mathcall : alpha x + beta y = 0$, where $q > 0$ and $beta > 0$.
As in the previous example, the characteristic equations (4.4) are readily solved to give
$$x = pt + C_1, y = qt + C_2$$
where $C_1$ and $C_2$ are constant along any characteristic. The assumption $q > 0$ means that $y$ increases along a characteristic as $t$ increases -- thus the parameter $t$ may be viewed as a time-like variable. This is illustrated in Fig. 4.1 where the arrows on the characteristics indicate increasing t.
In order to determine the solution at a point $P(x, y)$, we trace the characteristic through this point backwards in $t$ until it intersects the line $mathcall$. We shall suppose that this occurs at the point $Q$ having coordinates $x = beta s$, $y = − alpha s$ when $t = 0$. Then, from (4.8), we find $C_1 = beta s$, $C_2 = − alpha s$. Here $s$ is a parameter that plays a role similar to that of $k$ in the previous example. It varies along the line l and each choice of s selects a different characteristic:
$$x = pt + beta s, y = qt − alpha s$$
Next we consider the last characteristic equation
$$fracdudt = f(x(s, t), y(s, t))$$
Integrating gives
$$u(s, t) = u(s, 0) + int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$$
Here $u(s, 0)$ is a constant along any characteristic but varies from one characteristic to another.
My question is, how did the author get
$$u(s, t) = u(s, 0) + int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$$
by integrating?
Where did the $u(s, 0)$ term come from? And how was $int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$ calculated by integration? For instance, I have never seen something written like $dt'$?
Thank you for any explanation you could offer.
real-analysis integration multivariable-calculus pde characteristics
edited Jul 31 at 1:46
asked Jul 30 at 18:34
handler's handle
848
848
Keep in mind that $t'$ doesn't denote a derivative- it's just another variable. It might help to replace it with something like $z$. You can apply the fundamental theorem of calculus to see that this solution satisfies the differential equation. You can also check that the formula has the correct value for $u(s,t)$ at the initial time $t=0$.
– Brian Borchers
Jul 30 at 18:41
What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of $u(s,0)$? What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of the integral in the second term?
– Brian Borchers
Jul 30 at 18:53
@BrianBorchers Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, the $u(s, 0)$ is from using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus! And $int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$ is from the part 1 fundamental theorem of calculus. Using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus, we get $u(s, t) - u(s, 0)$ for the left-hand side integration.
– handler's handle
Jul 31 at 2:05
add a comment |Â
Keep in mind that $t'$ doesn't denote a derivative- it's just another variable. It might help to replace it with something like $z$. You can apply the fundamental theorem of calculus to see that this solution satisfies the differential equation. You can also check that the formula has the correct value for $u(s,t)$ at the initial time $t=0$.
– Brian Borchers
Jul 30 at 18:41
What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of $u(s,0)$? What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of the integral in the second term?
– Brian Borchers
Jul 30 at 18:53
@BrianBorchers Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, the $u(s, 0)$ is from using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus! And $int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$ is from the part 1 fundamental theorem of calculus. Using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus, we get $u(s, t) - u(s, 0)$ for the left-hand side integration.
– handler's handle
Jul 31 at 2:05
Keep in mind that $t'$ doesn't denote a derivative- it's just another variable. It might help to replace it with something like $z$. You can apply the fundamental theorem of calculus to see that this solution satisfies the differential equation. You can also check that the formula has the correct value for $u(s,t)$ at the initial time $t=0$.
– Brian Borchers
Jul 30 at 18:41
Keep in mind that $t'$ doesn't denote a derivative- it's just another variable. It might help to replace it with something like $z$. You can apply the fundamental theorem of calculus to see that this solution satisfies the differential equation. You can also check that the formula has the correct value for $u(s,t)$ at the initial time $t=0$.
– Brian Borchers
Jul 30 at 18:41
What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of $u(s,0)$? What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of the integral in the second term?
– Brian Borchers
Jul 30 at 18:53
What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of $u(s,0)$? What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of the integral in the second term?
– Brian Borchers
Jul 30 at 18:53
@BrianBorchers Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, the $u(s, 0)$ is from using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus! And $int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$ is from the part 1 fundamental theorem of calculus. Using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus, we get $u(s, t) - u(s, 0)$ for the left-hand side integration.
– handler's handle
Jul 31 at 2:05
@BrianBorchers Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, the $u(s, 0)$ is from using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus! And $int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$ is from the part 1 fundamental theorem of calculus. Using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus, we get $u(s, t) - u(s, 0)$ for the left-hand side integration.
– handler's handle
Jul 31 at 2:05
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2867290%2fcharacteristics-of-first-order-pdes-example-how-was-this-integration-done%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Keep in mind that $t'$ doesn't denote a derivative- it's just another variable. It might help to replace it with something like $z$. You can apply the fundamental theorem of calculus to see that this solution satisfies the differential equation. You can also check that the formula has the correct value for $u(s,t)$ at the initial time $t=0$.
– Brian Borchers
Jul 30 at 18:41
What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of $u(s,0)$? What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of the integral in the second term?
– Brian Borchers
Jul 30 at 18:53
@BrianBorchers Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, the $u(s, 0)$ is from using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus! And $int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$ is from the part 1 fundamental theorem of calculus. Using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus, we get $u(s, t) - u(s, 0)$ for the left-hand side integration.
– handler's handle
Jul 31 at 2:05