Characteristics of First-Order PDEs Example: How Was This Integration Done?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












From Essential Partial Differential Equations, by Griffiths, Dold, and Silvester:




Example 4.2 (Half-plane problem) Solve the PDE $pux + quy = f(x, y)$ (with $p$ and $q$ constant) in the domain $alpha x + beta y > 0$ given that $u = g(x)$ on the line $mathcall : alpha x + beta y = 0$, where $q > 0$ and $beta > 0$.



As in the previous example, the characteristic equations (4.4) are readily solved to give



$$x = pt + C_1, y = qt + C_2$$



where $C_1$ and $C_2$ are constant along any characteristic. The assumption $q > 0$ means that $y$ increases along a characteristic as $t$ increases -- thus the parameter $t$ may be viewed as a time-like variable. This is illustrated in Fig. 4.1 where the arrows on the characteristics indicate increasing t.



In order to determine the solution at a point $P(x, y)$, we trace the characteristic through this point backwards in $t$ until it intersects the line $mathcall$. We shall suppose that this occurs at the point $Q$ having coordinates $x = beta s$, $y = − alpha s$ when $t = 0$. Then, from (4.8), we find $C_1 = beta s$, $C_2 = − alpha s$. Here $s$ is a parameter that plays a role similar to that of $k$ in the previous example. It varies along the line l and each choice of s selects a different characteristic:



$$x = pt + beta s, y = qt − alpha s$$



Next we consider the last characteristic equation



$$fracdudt = f(x(s, t), y(s, t))$$



Integrating gives



$$u(s, t) = u(s, 0) + int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$$



Here $u(s, 0)$ is a constant along any characteristic but varies from one characteristic to another.




My question is, how did the author get



$$u(s, t) = u(s, 0) + int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$$



by integrating?



Where did the $u(s, 0)$ term come from? And how was $int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$ calculated by integration? For instance, I have never seen something written like $dt'$?



Thank you for any explanation you could offer.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • Keep in mind that $t'$ doesn't denote a derivative- it's just another variable. It might help to replace it with something like $z$. You can apply the fundamental theorem of calculus to see that this solution satisfies the differential equation. You can also check that the formula has the correct value for $u(s,t)$ at the initial time $t=0$.
    – Brian Borchers
    Jul 30 at 18:41










  • What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of $u(s,0)$? What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of the integral in the second term?
    – Brian Borchers
    Jul 30 at 18:53










  • @BrianBorchers Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, the $u(s, 0)$ is from using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus! And $int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$ is from the part 1 fundamental theorem of calculus. Using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus, we get $u(s, t) - u(s, 0)$ for the left-hand side integration.
    – handler's handle
    Jul 31 at 2:05














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












From Essential Partial Differential Equations, by Griffiths, Dold, and Silvester:




Example 4.2 (Half-plane problem) Solve the PDE $pux + quy = f(x, y)$ (with $p$ and $q$ constant) in the domain $alpha x + beta y > 0$ given that $u = g(x)$ on the line $mathcall : alpha x + beta y = 0$, where $q > 0$ and $beta > 0$.



As in the previous example, the characteristic equations (4.4) are readily solved to give



$$x = pt + C_1, y = qt + C_2$$



where $C_1$ and $C_2$ are constant along any characteristic. The assumption $q > 0$ means that $y$ increases along a characteristic as $t$ increases -- thus the parameter $t$ may be viewed as a time-like variable. This is illustrated in Fig. 4.1 where the arrows on the characteristics indicate increasing t.



In order to determine the solution at a point $P(x, y)$, we trace the characteristic through this point backwards in $t$ until it intersects the line $mathcall$. We shall suppose that this occurs at the point $Q$ having coordinates $x = beta s$, $y = − alpha s$ when $t = 0$. Then, from (4.8), we find $C_1 = beta s$, $C_2 = − alpha s$. Here $s$ is a parameter that plays a role similar to that of $k$ in the previous example. It varies along the line l and each choice of s selects a different characteristic:



$$x = pt + beta s, y = qt − alpha s$$



Next we consider the last characteristic equation



$$fracdudt = f(x(s, t), y(s, t))$$



Integrating gives



$$u(s, t) = u(s, 0) + int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$$



Here $u(s, 0)$ is a constant along any characteristic but varies from one characteristic to another.




My question is, how did the author get



$$u(s, t) = u(s, 0) + int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$$



by integrating?



Where did the $u(s, 0)$ term come from? And how was $int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$ calculated by integration? For instance, I have never seen something written like $dt'$?



Thank you for any explanation you could offer.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • Keep in mind that $t'$ doesn't denote a derivative- it's just another variable. It might help to replace it with something like $z$. You can apply the fundamental theorem of calculus to see that this solution satisfies the differential equation. You can also check that the formula has the correct value for $u(s,t)$ at the initial time $t=0$.
    – Brian Borchers
    Jul 30 at 18:41










  • What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of $u(s,0)$? What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of the integral in the second term?
    – Brian Borchers
    Jul 30 at 18:53










  • @BrianBorchers Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, the $u(s, 0)$ is from using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus! And $int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$ is from the part 1 fundamental theorem of calculus. Using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus, we get $u(s, t) - u(s, 0)$ for the left-hand side integration.
    – handler's handle
    Jul 31 at 2:05












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











From Essential Partial Differential Equations, by Griffiths, Dold, and Silvester:




Example 4.2 (Half-plane problem) Solve the PDE $pux + quy = f(x, y)$ (with $p$ and $q$ constant) in the domain $alpha x + beta y > 0$ given that $u = g(x)$ on the line $mathcall : alpha x + beta y = 0$, where $q > 0$ and $beta > 0$.



As in the previous example, the characteristic equations (4.4) are readily solved to give



$$x = pt + C_1, y = qt + C_2$$



where $C_1$ and $C_2$ are constant along any characteristic. The assumption $q > 0$ means that $y$ increases along a characteristic as $t$ increases -- thus the parameter $t$ may be viewed as a time-like variable. This is illustrated in Fig. 4.1 where the arrows on the characteristics indicate increasing t.



In order to determine the solution at a point $P(x, y)$, we trace the characteristic through this point backwards in $t$ until it intersects the line $mathcall$. We shall suppose that this occurs at the point $Q$ having coordinates $x = beta s$, $y = − alpha s$ when $t = 0$. Then, from (4.8), we find $C_1 = beta s$, $C_2 = − alpha s$. Here $s$ is a parameter that plays a role similar to that of $k$ in the previous example. It varies along the line l and each choice of s selects a different characteristic:



$$x = pt + beta s, y = qt − alpha s$$



Next we consider the last characteristic equation



$$fracdudt = f(x(s, t), y(s, t))$$



Integrating gives



$$u(s, t) = u(s, 0) + int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$$



Here $u(s, 0)$ is a constant along any characteristic but varies from one characteristic to another.




My question is, how did the author get



$$u(s, t) = u(s, 0) + int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$$



by integrating?



Where did the $u(s, 0)$ term come from? And how was $int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$ calculated by integration? For instance, I have never seen something written like $dt'$?



Thank you for any explanation you could offer.







share|cite|improve this question













From Essential Partial Differential Equations, by Griffiths, Dold, and Silvester:




Example 4.2 (Half-plane problem) Solve the PDE $pux + quy = f(x, y)$ (with $p$ and $q$ constant) in the domain $alpha x + beta y > 0$ given that $u = g(x)$ on the line $mathcall : alpha x + beta y = 0$, where $q > 0$ and $beta > 0$.



As in the previous example, the characteristic equations (4.4) are readily solved to give



$$x = pt + C_1, y = qt + C_2$$



where $C_1$ and $C_2$ are constant along any characteristic. The assumption $q > 0$ means that $y$ increases along a characteristic as $t$ increases -- thus the parameter $t$ may be viewed as a time-like variable. This is illustrated in Fig. 4.1 where the arrows on the characteristics indicate increasing t.



In order to determine the solution at a point $P(x, y)$, we trace the characteristic through this point backwards in $t$ until it intersects the line $mathcall$. We shall suppose that this occurs at the point $Q$ having coordinates $x = beta s$, $y = − alpha s$ when $t = 0$. Then, from (4.8), we find $C_1 = beta s$, $C_2 = − alpha s$. Here $s$ is a parameter that plays a role similar to that of $k$ in the previous example. It varies along the line l and each choice of s selects a different characteristic:



$$x = pt + beta s, y = qt − alpha s$$



Next we consider the last characteristic equation



$$fracdudt = f(x(s, t), y(s, t))$$



Integrating gives



$$u(s, t) = u(s, 0) + int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$$



Here $u(s, 0)$ is a constant along any characteristic but varies from one characteristic to another.




My question is, how did the author get



$$u(s, t) = u(s, 0) + int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$$



by integrating?



Where did the $u(s, 0)$ term come from? And how was $int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$ calculated by integration? For instance, I have never seen something written like $dt'$?



Thank you for any explanation you could offer.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 31 at 1:46
























asked Jul 30 at 18:34









handler's handle

848




848











  • Keep in mind that $t'$ doesn't denote a derivative- it's just another variable. It might help to replace it with something like $z$. You can apply the fundamental theorem of calculus to see that this solution satisfies the differential equation. You can also check that the formula has the correct value for $u(s,t)$ at the initial time $t=0$.
    – Brian Borchers
    Jul 30 at 18:41










  • What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of $u(s,0)$? What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of the integral in the second term?
    – Brian Borchers
    Jul 30 at 18:53










  • @BrianBorchers Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, the $u(s, 0)$ is from using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus! And $int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$ is from the part 1 fundamental theorem of calculus. Using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus, we get $u(s, t) - u(s, 0)$ for the left-hand side integration.
    – handler's handle
    Jul 31 at 2:05
















  • Keep in mind that $t'$ doesn't denote a derivative- it's just another variable. It might help to replace it with something like $z$. You can apply the fundamental theorem of calculus to see that this solution satisfies the differential equation. You can also check that the formula has the correct value for $u(s,t)$ at the initial time $t=0$.
    – Brian Borchers
    Jul 30 at 18:41










  • What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of $u(s,0)$? What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of the integral in the second term?
    – Brian Borchers
    Jul 30 at 18:53










  • @BrianBorchers Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, the $u(s, 0)$ is from using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus! And $int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$ is from the part 1 fundamental theorem of calculus. Using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus, we get $u(s, t) - u(s, 0)$ for the left-hand side integration.
    – handler's handle
    Jul 31 at 2:05















Keep in mind that $t'$ doesn't denote a derivative- it's just another variable. It might help to replace it with something like $z$. You can apply the fundamental theorem of calculus to see that this solution satisfies the differential equation. You can also check that the formula has the correct value for $u(s,t)$ at the initial time $t=0$.
– Brian Borchers
Jul 30 at 18:41




Keep in mind that $t'$ doesn't denote a derivative- it's just another variable. It might help to replace it with something like $z$. You can apply the fundamental theorem of calculus to see that this solution satisfies the differential equation. You can also check that the formula has the correct value for $u(s,t)$ at the initial time $t=0$.
– Brian Borchers
Jul 30 at 18:41












What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of $u(s,0)$? What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of the integral in the second term?
– Brian Borchers
Jul 30 at 18:53




What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of $u(s,0)$? What's the derivative with respect to $t$ of the integral in the second term?
– Brian Borchers
Jul 30 at 18:53












@BrianBorchers Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, the $u(s, 0)$ is from using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus! And $int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$ is from the part 1 fundamental theorem of calculus. Using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus, we get $u(s, t) - u(s, 0)$ for the left-hand side integration.
– handler's handle
Jul 31 at 2:05




@BrianBorchers Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, the $u(s, 0)$ is from using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus! And $int_0^t f(x(s, t'), y(s, t')) dt'$ is from the part 1 fundamental theorem of calculus. Using the part 2 fundamental theorem of calculus, we get $u(s, t) - u(s, 0)$ for the left-hand side integration.
– handler's handle
Jul 31 at 2:05















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2867290%2fcharacteristics-of-first-order-pdes-example-how-was-this-integration-done%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2867290%2fcharacteristics-of-first-order-pdes-example-how-was-this-integration-done%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?