Conjecture about special grid of numbers

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Consider you have created grid of numbers like following image starting from any positive integer (in this case 8)



enter image description here



To create such grid, follow this steps;



  1. Pick a number greater than one and write down $n, n-1, n-2, ..., 1$ as column headers

  2. Likewise, write down $n, n-1, n-2, ..., 1$ as row headers

  3. Fill each cell with $row_header * column_header$

If you group numbers diagonally starting from upper left, you get these groups of numbers



  1. 64

  2. 56, 56

  3. 48, 49, 48

  4. 40, 42, 42, 40

  5. etc.

Let $G_n$ denote nth group. I want to prove if following theory is correct.
$$
i < k Rightarrow forall x in G_i, forall y in G_k, x > y
$$



It seems to hold for small enough starting numbers like $8$. It is trival to prove that any cell will be bigger then the cells to the right on the same row and will be bigger then the cells below it on the same column. But, I can't be sure about diagonal groups.







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Consider you have created grid of numbers like following image starting from any positive integer (in this case 8)



    enter image description here



    To create such grid, follow this steps;



    1. Pick a number greater than one and write down $n, n-1, n-2, ..., 1$ as column headers

    2. Likewise, write down $n, n-1, n-2, ..., 1$ as row headers

    3. Fill each cell with $row_header * column_header$

    If you group numbers diagonally starting from upper left, you get these groups of numbers



    1. 64

    2. 56, 56

    3. 48, 49, 48

    4. 40, 42, 42, 40

    5. etc.

    Let $G_n$ denote nth group. I want to prove if following theory is correct.
    $$
    i < k Rightarrow forall x in G_i, forall y in G_k, x > y
    $$



    It seems to hold for small enough starting numbers like $8$. It is trival to prove that any cell will be bigger then the cells to the right on the same row and will be bigger then the cells below it on the same column. But, I can't be sure about diagonal groups.







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Consider you have created grid of numbers like following image starting from any positive integer (in this case 8)



      enter image description here



      To create such grid, follow this steps;



      1. Pick a number greater than one and write down $n, n-1, n-2, ..., 1$ as column headers

      2. Likewise, write down $n, n-1, n-2, ..., 1$ as row headers

      3. Fill each cell with $row_header * column_header$

      If you group numbers diagonally starting from upper left, you get these groups of numbers



      1. 64

      2. 56, 56

      3. 48, 49, 48

      4. 40, 42, 42, 40

      5. etc.

      Let $G_n$ denote nth group. I want to prove if following theory is correct.
      $$
      i < k Rightarrow forall x in G_i, forall y in G_k, x > y
      $$



      It seems to hold for small enough starting numbers like $8$. It is trival to prove that any cell will be bigger then the cells to the right on the same row and will be bigger then the cells below it on the same column. But, I can't be sure about diagonal groups.







      share|cite|improve this question











      Consider you have created grid of numbers like following image starting from any positive integer (in this case 8)



      enter image description here



      To create such grid, follow this steps;



      1. Pick a number greater than one and write down $n, n-1, n-2, ..., 1$ as column headers

      2. Likewise, write down $n, n-1, n-2, ..., 1$ as row headers

      3. Fill each cell with $row_header * column_header$

      If you group numbers diagonally starting from upper left, you get these groups of numbers



      1. 64

      2. 56, 56

      3. 48, 49, 48

      4. 40, 42, 42, 40

      5. etc.

      Let $G_n$ denote nth group. I want to prove if following theory is correct.
      $$
      i < k Rightarrow forall x in G_i, forall y in G_k, x > y
      $$



      It seems to hold for small enough starting numbers like $8$. It is trival to prove that any cell will be bigger then the cells to the right on the same row and will be bigger then the cells below it on the same column. But, I can't be sure about diagonal groups.









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 24 at 17:55









      yasar

      1674




      1674




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Well, it's not true in the image you included. $8cdot3=24$ is one diagonal further up than $5cdot5=25$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I feel pretty stupid now :)
            – yasar
            Jul 24 at 18:06










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2861604%2fconjecture-about-special-grid-of-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Well, it's not true in the image you included. $8cdot3=24$ is one diagonal further up than $5cdot5=25$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I feel pretty stupid now :)
            – yasar
            Jul 24 at 18:06














          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Well, it's not true in the image you included. $8cdot3=24$ is one diagonal further up than $5cdot5=25$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I feel pretty stupid now :)
            – yasar
            Jul 24 at 18:06












          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          Well, it's not true in the image you included. $8cdot3=24$ is one diagonal further up than $5cdot5=25$.






          share|cite|improve this answer













          Well, it's not true in the image you included. $8cdot3=24$ is one diagonal further up than $5cdot5=25$.







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer











          answered Jul 24 at 18:05









          joriki

          164k10180328




          164k10180328











          • I feel pretty stupid now :)
            – yasar
            Jul 24 at 18:06
















          • I feel pretty stupid now :)
            – yasar
            Jul 24 at 18:06















          I feel pretty stupid now :)
          – yasar
          Jul 24 at 18:06




          I feel pretty stupid now :)
          – yasar
          Jul 24 at 18:06












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2861604%2fconjecture-about-special-grid-of-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?