Does the norm $mathcalH := | w(x,y)log^+ (w(x,y)) |_L^1$ define a reflexive Banach space?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Suppose $Omega subset mathbbR^2$ is an open bounded set. Given the norm
beginequation*
| w(x,y) |_mathcalH(Omega) := | w(x,y) log^+(w(x,y)) |_L^1(Omega times Omega)
endequation*
where
beginequation*
log^+(x) = left{ beginarrayll log(x) & log(x) geq 0 \
0 & textelse endarray right.
endequation*
is the space
beginequation*
mathcalW = left w
endequation*
a reflexive Banach space? I saw this result utilized in a paper without any justification so I just wanted to verify that it is indeed true. Thanks for the help.
functional-analysis analysis banach-spaces
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Suppose $Omega subset mathbbR^2$ is an open bounded set. Given the norm
beginequation*
| w(x,y) |_mathcalH(Omega) := | w(x,y) log^+(w(x,y)) |_L^1(Omega times Omega)
endequation*
where
beginequation*
log^+(x) = left{ beginarrayll log(x) & log(x) geq 0 \
0 & textelse endarray right.
endequation*
is the space
beginequation*
mathcalW = left w
endequation*
a reflexive Banach space? I saw this result utilized in a paper without any justification so I just wanted to verify that it is indeed true. Thanks for the help.
functional-analysis analysis banach-spaces
In what sense is $mathcal W$ a "space"? It is not a vector space over $mathbb R$ nor $mathbb C$.
– Martin Argerami
Jul 30 at 17:24
The quantity you stated isn't a norm. Did you mean to define an Orlicz class? A reference to the paper where you saw this claim is an essential missing part of this question.
– user357151
Jul 30 at 19:39
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Suppose $Omega subset mathbbR^2$ is an open bounded set. Given the norm
beginequation*
| w(x,y) |_mathcalH(Omega) := | w(x,y) log^+(w(x,y)) |_L^1(Omega times Omega)
endequation*
where
beginequation*
log^+(x) = left{ beginarrayll log(x) & log(x) geq 0 \
0 & textelse endarray right.
endequation*
is the space
beginequation*
mathcalW = left w
endequation*
a reflexive Banach space? I saw this result utilized in a paper without any justification so I just wanted to verify that it is indeed true. Thanks for the help.
functional-analysis analysis banach-spaces
Suppose $Omega subset mathbbR^2$ is an open bounded set. Given the norm
beginequation*
| w(x,y) |_mathcalH(Omega) := | w(x,y) log^+(w(x,y)) |_L^1(Omega times Omega)
endequation*
where
beginequation*
log^+(x) = left{ beginarrayll log(x) & log(x) geq 0 \
0 & textelse endarray right.
endequation*
is the space
beginequation*
mathcalW = left w
endequation*
a reflexive Banach space? I saw this result utilized in a paper without any justification so I just wanted to verify that it is indeed true. Thanks for the help.
functional-analysis analysis banach-spaces
edited Jul 30 at 19:18


Martin Argerami
115k1071164
115k1071164
asked Jul 30 at 16:47
John
1588
1588
In what sense is $mathcal W$ a "space"? It is not a vector space over $mathbb R$ nor $mathbb C$.
– Martin Argerami
Jul 30 at 17:24
The quantity you stated isn't a norm. Did you mean to define an Orlicz class? A reference to the paper where you saw this claim is an essential missing part of this question.
– user357151
Jul 30 at 19:39
add a comment |Â
In what sense is $mathcal W$ a "space"? It is not a vector space over $mathbb R$ nor $mathbb C$.
– Martin Argerami
Jul 30 at 17:24
The quantity you stated isn't a norm. Did you mean to define an Orlicz class? A reference to the paper where you saw this claim is an essential missing part of this question.
– user357151
Jul 30 at 19:39
In what sense is $mathcal W$ a "space"? It is not a vector space over $mathbb R$ nor $mathbb C$.
– Martin Argerami
Jul 30 at 17:24
In what sense is $mathcal W$ a "space"? It is not a vector space over $mathbb R$ nor $mathbb C$.
– Martin Argerami
Jul 30 at 17:24
The quantity you stated isn't a norm. Did you mean to define an Orlicz class? A reference to the paper where you saw this claim is an essential missing part of this question.
– user357151
Jul 30 at 19:39
The quantity you stated isn't a norm. Did you mean to define an Orlicz class? A reference to the paper where you saw this claim is an essential missing part of this question.
– user357151
Jul 30 at 19:39
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2867193%2fdoes-the-norm-mathcalh-wx-y-log-wx-y-l1-define-a-reflex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
In what sense is $mathcal W$ a "space"? It is not a vector space over $mathbb R$ nor $mathbb C$.
– Martin Argerami
Jul 30 at 17:24
The quantity you stated isn't a norm. Did you mean to define an Orlicz class? A reference to the paper where you saw this claim is an essential missing part of this question.
– user357151
Jul 30 at 19:39