Dual norm of a product space

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Suppose we have two spaces $X, Y$, each is a linear space equipped with norm $|cdot|_X, |cdot|_Y$, then we define a norm on the product space $Z = Xtimes Y: |(x,y)| = sqrt_Y^2$, where $a,b > 0$.



I am wondering how to compute the dual norm of this norm. By the definition of dual norm, we need to find for $z^* in Z^*$, $|z^*|_* = undersetmathrmsup ;z^*(z)$, but what is $z^*(z)$ here? What are the elements in $Z^*$ like?







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    Suppose we have two spaces $X, Y$, each is a linear space equipped with norm $|cdot|_X, |cdot|_Y$, then we define a norm on the product space $Z = Xtimes Y: |(x,y)| = sqrt_Y^2$, where $a,b > 0$.



    I am wondering how to compute the dual norm of this norm. By the definition of dual norm, we need to find for $z^* in Z^*$, $|z^*|_* = undersetmathrmsup ;z^*(z)$, but what is $z^*(z)$ here? What are the elements in $Z^*$ like?







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      Suppose we have two spaces $X, Y$, each is a linear space equipped with norm $|cdot|_X, |cdot|_Y$, then we define a norm on the product space $Z = Xtimes Y: |(x,y)| = sqrt_Y^2$, where $a,b > 0$.



      I am wondering how to compute the dual norm of this norm. By the definition of dual norm, we need to find for $z^* in Z^*$, $|z^*|_* = undersetmathrmsup ;z^*(z)$, but what is $z^*(z)$ here? What are the elements in $Z^*$ like?







      share|cite|improve this question











      Suppose we have two spaces $X, Y$, each is a linear space equipped with norm $|cdot|_X, |cdot|_Y$, then we define a norm on the product space $Z = Xtimes Y: |(x,y)| = sqrt_Y^2$, where $a,b > 0$.



      I am wondering how to compute the dual norm of this norm. By the definition of dual norm, we need to find for $z^* in Z^*$, $|z^*|_* = undersetmathrmsup ;z^*(z)$, but what is $z^*(z)$ here? What are the elements in $Z^*$ like?









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 17 at 14:39









      Sean Ian

      545




      545




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Your dual space $(X times Y)^*$ is isometrically isomorphic to the product of dual spaces $X^* times Y^*$ equipped with the norm $|(f,g)| = sqrtg$.



          Proof:



          Define $J : X^* times Y^* to (X times Y)^*$ as



          $$[J(f,g)](x,y) = af(x) + bg(y)$$



          for $(f,g) in X^* times Y^*$.



          $J$ is clearly well-defined and linear. Check that its inverse is given by



          $$J^-1(F) = left(frac1a F(cdot, 0), frac1b F(0, cdot)right)$$



          for $F in (X times Y)^*$ so $J$ is bijective.



          We have



          $$[J(f,g)](x,y) = |af(x) + bg(y)| le a|f(x)| + b|g(y)| le a|f||x| + b|g||y| le sqrt^2sqrty = |(f,g)||(x,y)|$$



          so $|J(f,g)| le |(f,g)|$.



          To prove the converse inequality, let $varepsilon > 0$ and pick $x in X$, $y in Y$ such that $f(x) ge (1-varepsilon)|f||x|$ and $g(y) ge (1-varepsilon)|g||y|$.



          Consider $left(fracxx|f|, fracy|g|right) in X times Y$. Its norm is $$left|left(fracxx|f|, fracy|g|right)right| = sqrtright = sqrt^2 = |(f,g)|$$



          We have



          $$J(f,g)(x,y) = af(x) + bg(x) ge a(1-varepsilon)|f|left|fracxx|f|right| + b(1-varepsilon)left|fracy|g|right| = (1-varepsilon)(a|f|^2 + b|g|^2) = (1-varepsilon)|(f,g)|^2 = (1-varepsilon)|(f,g)||(x,y)|$$



          so $|J(f,g)| ge (1-varepsilon)|(f,g)|$. Since $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, we conclude $|J(f,g)| ge |(f,g)|$.



          Therefore $|J(f,g)| =|(f,g)|$ so $J$ is an isometric isomorphism.



          This gives you an explicit formula for the dual norm of $F in (X times Y)^*$:



          $$|F| = sqrt^2$$






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Perhaps I'm wrong but it seems to me that an element in $Z^*$ is of the form:



            $phi(x)+rho(y)$ where $phiin X^*$, $rho in Y^*$.



            It is first easy to see that elements of this form are indeed functionals on $Xtimes Y$. Furthermore, all $(x,y)in Xtimes Y$ can be written as $(x,y)=(x,0)+(0,y)$. Hence by linearity of the functionals, we know that for all $varphi in Z$ we have:



            $varphi(x,y)= varphi(x,0)+varphi(0,y)$. Where $phi(x):=varphi(x,0)$ and $rho(y):=varphi(0,y)$ are functionals on $X$ and $Y$ accordingly.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Seems correct. So the dual of the product space doesn't depend on the defined norm? How would you proceed to compute the dual norm then?
              – Sean Ian
              Jul 17 at 15:16










            • If we agree to denote all functional $varphi in Z^*$ as $varphi =phi+ rho$ as above, I would probably try to see whether $ fracVert phi Vert vert avert geq fracVert phi Vert vert avert$ and observe the expression:
              – Keen-ameteur
              Jul 17 at 15:58










            • $frac vert phi(x)+rho(y)vert sqrt aVert xVert_X^2+ b Vert yVert _Y^2 $
              – Keen-ameteur
              Jul 17 at 15:59










            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2854565%2fdual-norm-of-a-product-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            Your dual space $(X times Y)^*$ is isometrically isomorphic to the product of dual spaces $X^* times Y^*$ equipped with the norm $|(f,g)| = sqrtg$.



            Proof:



            Define $J : X^* times Y^* to (X times Y)^*$ as



            $$[J(f,g)](x,y) = af(x) + bg(y)$$



            for $(f,g) in X^* times Y^*$.



            $J$ is clearly well-defined and linear. Check that its inverse is given by



            $$J^-1(F) = left(frac1a F(cdot, 0), frac1b F(0, cdot)right)$$



            for $F in (X times Y)^*$ so $J$ is bijective.



            We have



            $$[J(f,g)](x,y) = |af(x) + bg(y)| le a|f(x)| + b|g(y)| le a|f||x| + b|g||y| le sqrt^2sqrty = |(f,g)||(x,y)|$$



            so $|J(f,g)| le |(f,g)|$.



            To prove the converse inequality, let $varepsilon > 0$ and pick $x in X$, $y in Y$ such that $f(x) ge (1-varepsilon)|f||x|$ and $g(y) ge (1-varepsilon)|g||y|$.



            Consider $left(fracxx|f|, fracy|g|right) in X times Y$. Its norm is $$left|left(fracxx|f|, fracy|g|right)right| = sqrtright = sqrt^2 = |(f,g)|$$



            We have



            $$J(f,g)(x,y) = af(x) + bg(x) ge a(1-varepsilon)|f|left|fracxx|f|right| + b(1-varepsilon)left|fracy|g|right| = (1-varepsilon)(a|f|^2 + b|g|^2) = (1-varepsilon)|(f,g)|^2 = (1-varepsilon)|(f,g)||(x,y)|$$



            so $|J(f,g)| ge (1-varepsilon)|(f,g)|$. Since $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, we conclude $|J(f,g)| ge |(f,g)|$.



            Therefore $|J(f,g)| =|(f,g)|$ so $J$ is an isometric isomorphism.



            This gives you an explicit formula for the dual norm of $F in (X times Y)^*$:



            $$|F| = sqrt^2$$






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              Your dual space $(X times Y)^*$ is isometrically isomorphic to the product of dual spaces $X^* times Y^*$ equipped with the norm $|(f,g)| = sqrtg$.



              Proof:



              Define $J : X^* times Y^* to (X times Y)^*$ as



              $$[J(f,g)](x,y) = af(x) + bg(y)$$



              for $(f,g) in X^* times Y^*$.



              $J$ is clearly well-defined and linear. Check that its inverse is given by



              $$J^-1(F) = left(frac1a F(cdot, 0), frac1b F(0, cdot)right)$$



              for $F in (X times Y)^*$ so $J$ is bijective.



              We have



              $$[J(f,g)](x,y) = |af(x) + bg(y)| le a|f(x)| + b|g(y)| le a|f||x| + b|g||y| le sqrt^2sqrty = |(f,g)||(x,y)|$$



              so $|J(f,g)| le |(f,g)|$.



              To prove the converse inequality, let $varepsilon > 0$ and pick $x in X$, $y in Y$ such that $f(x) ge (1-varepsilon)|f||x|$ and $g(y) ge (1-varepsilon)|g||y|$.



              Consider $left(fracxx|f|, fracy|g|right) in X times Y$. Its norm is $$left|left(fracxx|f|, fracy|g|right)right| = sqrtright = sqrt^2 = |(f,g)|$$



              We have



              $$J(f,g)(x,y) = af(x) + bg(x) ge a(1-varepsilon)|f|left|fracxx|f|right| + b(1-varepsilon)left|fracy|g|right| = (1-varepsilon)(a|f|^2 + b|g|^2) = (1-varepsilon)|(f,g)|^2 = (1-varepsilon)|(f,g)||(x,y)|$$



              so $|J(f,g)| ge (1-varepsilon)|(f,g)|$. Since $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, we conclude $|J(f,g)| ge |(f,g)|$.



              Therefore $|J(f,g)| =|(f,g)|$ so $J$ is an isometric isomorphism.



              This gives you an explicit formula for the dual norm of $F in (X times Y)^*$:



              $$|F| = sqrt^2$$






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted






                Your dual space $(X times Y)^*$ is isometrically isomorphic to the product of dual spaces $X^* times Y^*$ equipped with the norm $|(f,g)| = sqrtg$.



                Proof:



                Define $J : X^* times Y^* to (X times Y)^*$ as



                $$[J(f,g)](x,y) = af(x) + bg(y)$$



                for $(f,g) in X^* times Y^*$.



                $J$ is clearly well-defined and linear. Check that its inverse is given by



                $$J^-1(F) = left(frac1a F(cdot, 0), frac1b F(0, cdot)right)$$



                for $F in (X times Y)^*$ so $J$ is bijective.



                We have



                $$[J(f,g)](x,y) = |af(x) + bg(y)| le a|f(x)| + b|g(y)| le a|f||x| + b|g||y| le sqrt^2sqrty = |(f,g)||(x,y)|$$



                so $|J(f,g)| le |(f,g)|$.



                To prove the converse inequality, let $varepsilon > 0$ and pick $x in X$, $y in Y$ such that $f(x) ge (1-varepsilon)|f||x|$ and $g(y) ge (1-varepsilon)|g||y|$.



                Consider $left(fracxx|f|, fracy|g|right) in X times Y$. Its norm is $$left|left(fracxx|f|, fracy|g|right)right| = sqrtright = sqrt^2 = |(f,g)|$$



                We have



                $$J(f,g)(x,y) = af(x) + bg(x) ge a(1-varepsilon)|f|left|fracxx|f|right| + b(1-varepsilon)left|fracy|g|right| = (1-varepsilon)(a|f|^2 + b|g|^2) = (1-varepsilon)|(f,g)|^2 = (1-varepsilon)|(f,g)||(x,y)|$$



                so $|J(f,g)| ge (1-varepsilon)|(f,g)|$. Since $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, we conclude $|J(f,g)| ge |(f,g)|$.



                Therefore $|J(f,g)| =|(f,g)|$ so $J$ is an isometric isomorphism.



                This gives you an explicit formula for the dual norm of $F in (X times Y)^*$:



                $$|F| = sqrt^2$$






                share|cite|improve this answer













                Your dual space $(X times Y)^*$ is isometrically isomorphic to the product of dual spaces $X^* times Y^*$ equipped with the norm $|(f,g)| = sqrtg$.



                Proof:



                Define $J : X^* times Y^* to (X times Y)^*$ as



                $$[J(f,g)](x,y) = af(x) + bg(y)$$



                for $(f,g) in X^* times Y^*$.



                $J$ is clearly well-defined and linear. Check that its inverse is given by



                $$J^-1(F) = left(frac1a F(cdot, 0), frac1b F(0, cdot)right)$$



                for $F in (X times Y)^*$ so $J$ is bijective.



                We have



                $$[J(f,g)](x,y) = |af(x) + bg(y)| le a|f(x)| + b|g(y)| le a|f||x| + b|g||y| le sqrt^2sqrty = |(f,g)||(x,y)|$$



                so $|J(f,g)| le |(f,g)|$.



                To prove the converse inequality, let $varepsilon > 0$ and pick $x in X$, $y in Y$ such that $f(x) ge (1-varepsilon)|f||x|$ and $g(y) ge (1-varepsilon)|g||y|$.



                Consider $left(fracxx|f|, fracy|g|right) in X times Y$. Its norm is $$left|left(fracxx|f|, fracy|g|right)right| = sqrtright = sqrt^2 = |(f,g)|$$



                We have



                $$J(f,g)(x,y) = af(x) + bg(x) ge a(1-varepsilon)|f|left|fracxx|f|right| + b(1-varepsilon)left|fracy|g|right| = (1-varepsilon)(a|f|^2 + b|g|^2) = (1-varepsilon)|(f,g)|^2 = (1-varepsilon)|(f,g)||(x,y)|$$



                so $|J(f,g)| ge (1-varepsilon)|(f,g)|$. Since $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, we conclude $|J(f,g)| ge |(f,g)|$.



                Therefore $|J(f,g)| =|(f,g)|$ so $J$ is an isometric isomorphism.



                This gives you an explicit formula for the dual norm of $F in (X times Y)^*$:



                $$|F| = sqrt^2$$







                share|cite|improve this answer













                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer











                answered Jul 17 at 17:04









                mechanodroid

                22.2k52041




                22.2k52041




















                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote













                    Perhaps I'm wrong but it seems to me that an element in $Z^*$ is of the form:



                    $phi(x)+rho(y)$ where $phiin X^*$, $rho in Y^*$.



                    It is first easy to see that elements of this form are indeed functionals on $Xtimes Y$. Furthermore, all $(x,y)in Xtimes Y$ can be written as $(x,y)=(x,0)+(0,y)$. Hence by linearity of the functionals, we know that for all $varphi in Z$ we have:



                    $varphi(x,y)= varphi(x,0)+varphi(0,y)$. Where $phi(x):=varphi(x,0)$ and $rho(y):=varphi(0,y)$ are functionals on $X$ and $Y$ accordingly.






                    share|cite|improve this answer





















                    • Seems correct. So the dual of the product space doesn't depend on the defined norm? How would you proceed to compute the dual norm then?
                      – Sean Ian
                      Jul 17 at 15:16










                    • If we agree to denote all functional $varphi in Z^*$ as $varphi =phi+ rho$ as above, I would probably try to see whether $ fracVert phi Vert vert avert geq fracVert phi Vert vert avert$ and observe the expression:
                      – Keen-ameteur
                      Jul 17 at 15:58










                    • $frac vert phi(x)+rho(y)vert sqrt aVert xVert_X^2+ b Vert yVert _Y^2 $
                      – Keen-ameteur
                      Jul 17 at 15:59














                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote













                    Perhaps I'm wrong but it seems to me that an element in $Z^*$ is of the form:



                    $phi(x)+rho(y)$ where $phiin X^*$, $rho in Y^*$.



                    It is first easy to see that elements of this form are indeed functionals on $Xtimes Y$. Furthermore, all $(x,y)in Xtimes Y$ can be written as $(x,y)=(x,0)+(0,y)$. Hence by linearity of the functionals, we know that for all $varphi in Z$ we have:



                    $varphi(x,y)= varphi(x,0)+varphi(0,y)$. Where $phi(x):=varphi(x,0)$ and $rho(y):=varphi(0,y)$ are functionals on $X$ and $Y$ accordingly.






                    share|cite|improve this answer





















                    • Seems correct. So the dual of the product space doesn't depend on the defined norm? How would you proceed to compute the dual norm then?
                      – Sean Ian
                      Jul 17 at 15:16










                    • If we agree to denote all functional $varphi in Z^*$ as $varphi =phi+ rho$ as above, I would probably try to see whether $ fracVert phi Vert vert avert geq fracVert phi Vert vert avert$ and observe the expression:
                      – Keen-ameteur
                      Jul 17 at 15:58










                    • $frac vert phi(x)+rho(y)vert sqrt aVert xVert_X^2+ b Vert yVert _Y^2 $
                      – Keen-ameteur
                      Jul 17 at 15:59












                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote









                    Perhaps I'm wrong but it seems to me that an element in $Z^*$ is of the form:



                    $phi(x)+rho(y)$ where $phiin X^*$, $rho in Y^*$.



                    It is first easy to see that elements of this form are indeed functionals on $Xtimes Y$. Furthermore, all $(x,y)in Xtimes Y$ can be written as $(x,y)=(x,0)+(0,y)$. Hence by linearity of the functionals, we know that for all $varphi in Z$ we have:



                    $varphi(x,y)= varphi(x,0)+varphi(0,y)$. Where $phi(x):=varphi(x,0)$ and $rho(y):=varphi(0,y)$ are functionals on $X$ and $Y$ accordingly.






                    share|cite|improve this answer













                    Perhaps I'm wrong but it seems to me that an element in $Z^*$ is of the form:



                    $phi(x)+rho(y)$ where $phiin X^*$, $rho in Y^*$.



                    It is first easy to see that elements of this form are indeed functionals on $Xtimes Y$. Furthermore, all $(x,y)in Xtimes Y$ can be written as $(x,y)=(x,0)+(0,y)$. Hence by linearity of the functionals, we know that for all $varphi in Z$ we have:



                    $varphi(x,y)= varphi(x,0)+varphi(0,y)$. Where $phi(x):=varphi(x,0)$ and $rho(y):=varphi(0,y)$ are functionals on $X$ and $Y$ accordingly.







                    share|cite|improve this answer













                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    answered Jul 17 at 14:56









                    Keen-ameteur

                    644213




                    644213











                    • Seems correct. So the dual of the product space doesn't depend on the defined norm? How would you proceed to compute the dual norm then?
                      – Sean Ian
                      Jul 17 at 15:16










                    • If we agree to denote all functional $varphi in Z^*$ as $varphi =phi+ rho$ as above, I would probably try to see whether $ fracVert phi Vert vert avert geq fracVert phi Vert vert avert$ and observe the expression:
                      – Keen-ameteur
                      Jul 17 at 15:58










                    • $frac vert phi(x)+rho(y)vert sqrt aVert xVert_X^2+ b Vert yVert _Y^2 $
                      – Keen-ameteur
                      Jul 17 at 15:59
















                    • Seems correct. So the dual of the product space doesn't depend on the defined norm? How would you proceed to compute the dual norm then?
                      – Sean Ian
                      Jul 17 at 15:16










                    • If we agree to denote all functional $varphi in Z^*$ as $varphi =phi+ rho$ as above, I would probably try to see whether $ fracVert phi Vert vert avert geq fracVert phi Vert vert avert$ and observe the expression:
                      – Keen-ameteur
                      Jul 17 at 15:58










                    • $frac vert phi(x)+rho(y)vert sqrt aVert xVert_X^2+ b Vert yVert _Y^2 $
                      – Keen-ameteur
                      Jul 17 at 15:59















                    Seems correct. So the dual of the product space doesn't depend on the defined norm? How would you proceed to compute the dual norm then?
                    – Sean Ian
                    Jul 17 at 15:16




                    Seems correct. So the dual of the product space doesn't depend on the defined norm? How would you proceed to compute the dual norm then?
                    – Sean Ian
                    Jul 17 at 15:16












                    If we agree to denote all functional $varphi in Z^*$ as $varphi =phi+ rho$ as above, I would probably try to see whether $ fracVert phi Vert vert avert geq fracVert phi Vert vert avert$ and observe the expression:
                    – Keen-ameteur
                    Jul 17 at 15:58




                    If we agree to denote all functional $varphi in Z^*$ as $varphi =phi+ rho$ as above, I would probably try to see whether $ fracVert phi Vert vert avert geq fracVert phi Vert vert avert$ and observe the expression:
                    – Keen-ameteur
                    Jul 17 at 15:58












                    $frac vert phi(x)+rho(y)vert sqrt aVert xVert_X^2+ b Vert yVert _Y^2 $
                    – Keen-ameteur
                    Jul 17 at 15:59




                    $frac vert phi(x)+rho(y)vert sqrt aVert xVert_X^2+ b Vert yVert _Y^2 $
                    – Keen-ameteur
                    Jul 17 at 15:59












                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2854565%2fdual-norm-of-a-product-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                    Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                    Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?