Evaluating a nested log integral

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1













Question:$$intlimits_0^1mathrm dx,frac loglogfrac 1x(1+x)^2=frac 12logfrac pi2-frac gamma2$$




I’ve had some practice with similar integrals, but this one eludes me for some reason. I first made the transformation $xmapsto-log x$ to get rid of the nested log. Therefore$$mathfrakI=intlimits_0^inftymathrm dx,frac e^-xlog x(1+e^-x)^2$$
The inside integrand can be rewritten as an infinite series to get$$mathfrakI=sumlimits_ngeq0(n+1)(-1)^nintlimits_0^inftymathrm dx, e^-x(n+1)log x$$The inside integral, I thought, could be evaluated by differentiating the gamma function to get$$intlimits_0^inftymathrm dt, e^-t(n+1)log t=-frac gamman+1-frac log(n+1)n+1$$
However, when I simplify everything and split the sum, neither sum converges. If we consider it as a Cesaro sum, then I know for sure that$$sumlimits_ngeq0(-1)^n=frac 12$$Which eventually does give the right answer. But I’m not sure if we’re quite allowed to do that especially because in a general sense, neither sum converges.







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    5
    down vote

    favorite
    1













    Question:$$intlimits_0^1mathrm dx,frac loglogfrac 1x(1+x)^2=frac 12logfrac pi2-frac gamma2$$




    I’ve had some practice with similar integrals, but this one eludes me for some reason. I first made the transformation $xmapsto-log x$ to get rid of the nested log. Therefore$$mathfrakI=intlimits_0^inftymathrm dx,frac e^-xlog x(1+e^-x)^2$$
    The inside integrand can be rewritten as an infinite series to get$$mathfrakI=sumlimits_ngeq0(n+1)(-1)^nintlimits_0^inftymathrm dx, e^-x(n+1)log x$$The inside integral, I thought, could be evaluated by differentiating the gamma function to get$$intlimits_0^inftymathrm dt, e^-t(n+1)log t=-frac gamman+1-frac log(n+1)n+1$$
    However, when I simplify everything and split the sum, neither sum converges. If we consider it as a Cesaro sum, then I know for sure that$$sumlimits_ngeq0(-1)^n=frac 12$$Which eventually does give the right answer. But I’m not sure if we’re quite allowed to do that especially because in a general sense, neither sum converges.







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1






      Question:$$intlimits_0^1mathrm dx,frac loglogfrac 1x(1+x)^2=frac 12logfrac pi2-frac gamma2$$




      I’ve had some practice with similar integrals, but this one eludes me for some reason. I first made the transformation $xmapsto-log x$ to get rid of the nested log. Therefore$$mathfrakI=intlimits_0^inftymathrm dx,frac e^-xlog x(1+e^-x)^2$$
      The inside integrand can be rewritten as an infinite series to get$$mathfrakI=sumlimits_ngeq0(n+1)(-1)^nintlimits_0^inftymathrm dx, e^-x(n+1)log x$$The inside integral, I thought, could be evaluated by differentiating the gamma function to get$$intlimits_0^inftymathrm dt, e^-t(n+1)log t=-frac gamman+1-frac log(n+1)n+1$$
      However, when I simplify everything and split the sum, neither sum converges. If we consider it as a Cesaro sum, then I know for sure that$$sumlimits_ngeq0(-1)^n=frac 12$$Which eventually does give the right answer. But I’m not sure if we’re quite allowed to do that especially because in a general sense, neither sum converges.







      share|cite|improve this question












      Question:$$intlimits_0^1mathrm dx,frac loglogfrac 1x(1+x)^2=frac 12logfrac pi2-frac gamma2$$




      I’ve had some practice with similar integrals, but this one eludes me for some reason. I first made the transformation $xmapsto-log x$ to get rid of the nested log. Therefore$$mathfrakI=intlimits_0^inftymathrm dx,frac e^-xlog x(1+e^-x)^2$$
      The inside integrand can be rewritten as an infinite series to get$$mathfrakI=sumlimits_ngeq0(n+1)(-1)^nintlimits_0^inftymathrm dx, e^-x(n+1)log x$$The inside integral, I thought, could be evaluated by differentiating the gamma function to get$$intlimits_0^inftymathrm dt, e^-t(n+1)log t=-frac gamman+1-frac log(n+1)n+1$$
      However, when I simplify everything and split the sum, neither sum converges. If we consider it as a Cesaro sum, then I know for sure that$$sumlimits_ngeq0(-1)^n=frac 12$$Which eventually does give the right answer. But I’m not sure if we’re quite allowed to do that especially because in a general sense, neither sum converges.









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 16 at 20:18









      Frank

      3,7051629




      3,7051629




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          5
          down vote













          By the dominated convergence theorem we have
          $$ mathfrakI = lim_r nearrow 1 I(r) , ,$$
          where for $r in (0,1)$ we have defined
          $$ I(r) = intlimits_0^1 mathrmd x,frac loglogfrac 1x(1+r x)^2 , . $$
          With this regularisation interchanging summation and integration is actually justified and your calculations lead to
          $$ I(r) = - gamma sum limits_n=0^infty (-r)^n - sum limits_n=0^infty (-r)^n log(1+n) equiv I_1 (r) + I_2(r) , . $$
          The first sum is easy:
          $$ I_1(r) = - fracgamma1+r , , $$
          so $lim_r nearrow 1 I_1(r) = - fracgamma2$ .



          For the second sum we can write
          beginalign
          I_2(r) &= frac1r sum_n=1^infty (-r)^n log(n) \
          &= frac12r sum_k=1^infty [2 r^2k log(2k) - r^2k-1 log(2k-1) - r^2k+1 log(2k+1)] \
          &= frac12r sum_k=1^infty r^2k left[logleft(frac4k^24k^2-1right) + (1-r) log(2k+1) - frac1r (1-r) log(2k-1)right] \
          &= frac12r sum_k=1^infty r^2k left[logleft(frac4k^24k^2-1right) + (1-r)^2 log(2k+1)right] , .
          endalign
          The second term can be estimated by
          beginalign
          frac(1-r)^22r sum_k=1^infty r^2k log(2k+1) &leq frac(1-r)^22r^2 sum_n=1^infty sqrtn r^n \
          &= frac(1-r)^22r^2 operatornameLi_-1/2 (r) \
          &= fracsqrtpi4 r^2 sqrt1-r + mathcalO left((1-r)^3/2right)
          endalign
          as $r nearrow 1$. The asymptotic behaviour of the polylogarithm can be deduced from the series given here (the second one below 2.). Now we can use the monotone convergence theorem and Wallis' product to find
          $$ lim_r nearrow 1 I_2 (r) = frac12 sum_k=1^infty logleft(frac4k^24k^2-1right) = frac12 log left(prod_k=1^infty frac4k^24k^2-1right) = frac12 log left(fracpi2right) , . $$



          Therefore
          $$ mathfrakI = frac12 left[log left(fracpi2right) - gammaright]$$
          as claimed.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Confirmed by Mathematica: $frac12 left(log left(fracpi 2right)-gamma right)$
            – David G. Stork
            Jul 16 at 21:51










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2853819%2fevaluating-a-nested-log-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          5
          down vote













          By the dominated convergence theorem we have
          $$ mathfrakI = lim_r nearrow 1 I(r) , ,$$
          where for $r in (0,1)$ we have defined
          $$ I(r) = intlimits_0^1 mathrmd x,frac loglogfrac 1x(1+r x)^2 , . $$
          With this regularisation interchanging summation and integration is actually justified and your calculations lead to
          $$ I(r) = - gamma sum limits_n=0^infty (-r)^n - sum limits_n=0^infty (-r)^n log(1+n) equiv I_1 (r) + I_2(r) , . $$
          The first sum is easy:
          $$ I_1(r) = - fracgamma1+r , , $$
          so $lim_r nearrow 1 I_1(r) = - fracgamma2$ .



          For the second sum we can write
          beginalign
          I_2(r) &= frac1r sum_n=1^infty (-r)^n log(n) \
          &= frac12r sum_k=1^infty [2 r^2k log(2k) - r^2k-1 log(2k-1) - r^2k+1 log(2k+1)] \
          &= frac12r sum_k=1^infty r^2k left[logleft(frac4k^24k^2-1right) + (1-r) log(2k+1) - frac1r (1-r) log(2k-1)right] \
          &= frac12r sum_k=1^infty r^2k left[logleft(frac4k^24k^2-1right) + (1-r)^2 log(2k+1)right] , .
          endalign
          The second term can be estimated by
          beginalign
          frac(1-r)^22r sum_k=1^infty r^2k log(2k+1) &leq frac(1-r)^22r^2 sum_n=1^infty sqrtn r^n \
          &= frac(1-r)^22r^2 operatornameLi_-1/2 (r) \
          &= fracsqrtpi4 r^2 sqrt1-r + mathcalO left((1-r)^3/2right)
          endalign
          as $r nearrow 1$. The asymptotic behaviour of the polylogarithm can be deduced from the series given here (the second one below 2.). Now we can use the monotone convergence theorem and Wallis' product to find
          $$ lim_r nearrow 1 I_2 (r) = frac12 sum_k=1^infty logleft(frac4k^24k^2-1right) = frac12 log left(prod_k=1^infty frac4k^24k^2-1right) = frac12 log left(fracpi2right) , . $$



          Therefore
          $$ mathfrakI = frac12 left[log left(fracpi2right) - gammaright]$$
          as claimed.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Confirmed by Mathematica: $frac12 left(log left(fracpi 2right)-gamma right)$
            – David G. Stork
            Jul 16 at 21:51














          up vote
          5
          down vote













          By the dominated convergence theorem we have
          $$ mathfrakI = lim_r nearrow 1 I(r) , ,$$
          where for $r in (0,1)$ we have defined
          $$ I(r) = intlimits_0^1 mathrmd x,frac loglogfrac 1x(1+r x)^2 , . $$
          With this regularisation interchanging summation and integration is actually justified and your calculations lead to
          $$ I(r) = - gamma sum limits_n=0^infty (-r)^n - sum limits_n=0^infty (-r)^n log(1+n) equiv I_1 (r) + I_2(r) , . $$
          The first sum is easy:
          $$ I_1(r) = - fracgamma1+r , , $$
          so $lim_r nearrow 1 I_1(r) = - fracgamma2$ .



          For the second sum we can write
          beginalign
          I_2(r) &= frac1r sum_n=1^infty (-r)^n log(n) \
          &= frac12r sum_k=1^infty [2 r^2k log(2k) - r^2k-1 log(2k-1) - r^2k+1 log(2k+1)] \
          &= frac12r sum_k=1^infty r^2k left[logleft(frac4k^24k^2-1right) + (1-r) log(2k+1) - frac1r (1-r) log(2k-1)right] \
          &= frac12r sum_k=1^infty r^2k left[logleft(frac4k^24k^2-1right) + (1-r)^2 log(2k+1)right] , .
          endalign
          The second term can be estimated by
          beginalign
          frac(1-r)^22r sum_k=1^infty r^2k log(2k+1) &leq frac(1-r)^22r^2 sum_n=1^infty sqrtn r^n \
          &= frac(1-r)^22r^2 operatornameLi_-1/2 (r) \
          &= fracsqrtpi4 r^2 sqrt1-r + mathcalO left((1-r)^3/2right)
          endalign
          as $r nearrow 1$. The asymptotic behaviour of the polylogarithm can be deduced from the series given here (the second one below 2.). Now we can use the monotone convergence theorem and Wallis' product to find
          $$ lim_r nearrow 1 I_2 (r) = frac12 sum_k=1^infty logleft(frac4k^24k^2-1right) = frac12 log left(prod_k=1^infty frac4k^24k^2-1right) = frac12 log left(fracpi2right) , . $$



          Therefore
          $$ mathfrakI = frac12 left[log left(fracpi2right) - gammaright]$$
          as claimed.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Confirmed by Mathematica: $frac12 left(log left(fracpi 2right)-gamma right)$
            – David G. Stork
            Jul 16 at 21:51












          up vote
          5
          down vote










          up vote
          5
          down vote









          By the dominated convergence theorem we have
          $$ mathfrakI = lim_r nearrow 1 I(r) , ,$$
          where for $r in (0,1)$ we have defined
          $$ I(r) = intlimits_0^1 mathrmd x,frac loglogfrac 1x(1+r x)^2 , . $$
          With this regularisation interchanging summation and integration is actually justified and your calculations lead to
          $$ I(r) = - gamma sum limits_n=0^infty (-r)^n - sum limits_n=0^infty (-r)^n log(1+n) equiv I_1 (r) + I_2(r) , . $$
          The first sum is easy:
          $$ I_1(r) = - fracgamma1+r , , $$
          so $lim_r nearrow 1 I_1(r) = - fracgamma2$ .



          For the second sum we can write
          beginalign
          I_2(r) &= frac1r sum_n=1^infty (-r)^n log(n) \
          &= frac12r sum_k=1^infty [2 r^2k log(2k) - r^2k-1 log(2k-1) - r^2k+1 log(2k+1)] \
          &= frac12r sum_k=1^infty r^2k left[logleft(frac4k^24k^2-1right) + (1-r) log(2k+1) - frac1r (1-r) log(2k-1)right] \
          &= frac12r sum_k=1^infty r^2k left[logleft(frac4k^24k^2-1right) + (1-r)^2 log(2k+1)right] , .
          endalign
          The second term can be estimated by
          beginalign
          frac(1-r)^22r sum_k=1^infty r^2k log(2k+1) &leq frac(1-r)^22r^2 sum_n=1^infty sqrtn r^n \
          &= frac(1-r)^22r^2 operatornameLi_-1/2 (r) \
          &= fracsqrtpi4 r^2 sqrt1-r + mathcalO left((1-r)^3/2right)
          endalign
          as $r nearrow 1$. The asymptotic behaviour of the polylogarithm can be deduced from the series given here (the second one below 2.). Now we can use the monotone convergence theorem and Wallis' product to find
          $$ lim_r nearrow 1 I_2 (r) = frac12 sum_k=1^infty logleft(frac4k^24k^2-1right) = frac12 log left(prod_k=1^infty frac4k^24k^2-1right) = frac12 log left(fracpi2right) , . $$



          Therefore
          $$ mathfrakI = frac12 left[log left(fracpi2right) - gammaright]$$
          as claimed.






          share|cite|improve this answer













          By the dominated convergence theorem we have
          $$ mathfrakI = lim_r nearrow 1 I(r) , ,$$
          where for $r in (0,1)$ we have defined
          $$ I(r) = intlimits_0^1 mathrmd x,frac loglogfrac 1x(1+r x)^2 , . $$
          With this regularisation interchanging summation and integration is actually justified and your calculations lead to
          $$ I(r) = - gamma sum limits_n=0^infty (-r)^n - sum limits_n=0^infty (-r)^n log(1+n) equiv I_1 (r) + I_2(r) , . $$
          The first sum is easy:
          $$ I_1(r) = - fracgamma1+r , , $$
          so $lim_r nearrow 1 I_1(r) = - fracgamma2$ .



          For the second sum we can write
          beginalign
          I_2(r) &= frac1r sum_n=1^infty (-r)^n log(n) \
          &= frac12r sum_k=1^infty [2 r^2k log(2k) - r^2k-1 log(2k-1) - r^2k+1 log(2k+1)] \
          &= frac12r sum_k=1^infty r^2k left[logleft(frac4k^24k^2-1right) + (1-r) log(2k+1) - frac1r (1-r) log(2k-1)right] \
          &= frac12r sum_k=1^infty r^2k left[logleft(frac4k^24k^2-1right) + (1-r)^2 log(2k+1)right] , .
          endalign
          The second term can be estimated by
          beginalign
          frac(1-r)^22r sum_k=1^infty r^2k log(2k+1) &leq frac(1-r)^22r^2 sum_n=1^infty sqrtn r^n \
          &= frac(1-r)^22r^2 operatornameLi_-1/2 (r) \
          &= fracsqrtpi4 r^2 sqrt1-r + mathcalO left((1-r)^3/2right)
          endalign
          as $r nearrow 1$. The asymptotic behaviour of the polylogarithm can be deduced from the series given here (the second one below 2.). Now we can use the monotone convergence theorem and Wallis' product to find
          $$ lim_r nearrow 1 I_2 (r) = frac12 sum_k=1^infty logleft(frac4k^24k^2-1right) = frac12 log left(prod_k=1^infty frac4k^24k^2-1right) = frac12 log left(fracpi2right) , . $$



          Therefore
          $$ mathfrakI = frac12 left[log left(fracpi2right) - gammaright]$$
          as claimed.







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer











          answered Jul 16 at 21:32









          ComplexYetTrivial

          2,702624




          2,702624











          • Confirmed by Mathematica: $frac12 left(log left(fracpi 2right)-gamma right)$
            – David G. Stork
            Jul 16 at 21:51
















          • Confirmed by Mathematica: $frac12 left(log left(fracpi 2right)-gamma right)$
            – David G. Stork
            Jul 16 at 21:51















          Confirmed by Mathematica: $frac12 left(log left(fracpi 2right)-gamma right)$
          – David G. Stork
          Jul 16 at 21:51




          Confirmed by Mathematica: $frac12 left(log left(fracpi 2right)-gamma right)$
          – David G. Stork
          Jul 16 at 21:51












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2853819%2fevaluating-a-nested-log-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon