Find an equivalent to $sum_k=n^infty frac1k!$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I would like to find an equivalent of $sum_k=n^infty frac1k!$. Can I do as follow ? (since I always have doubt with those $o$ and $O$, I would like your opinion.



$$n!sum_k=n^infty frac1k!=1+frac1n+1+frac1(n+1)(n+2)+frac1(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)+cdots$$
$$=1+frac1n+1+mathcal Oleft(sum_k=n+1^infty frac1k^2right)=1+o(1).$$
and thus the claim follow.



Q1) Is it correct ?



Q2)



I have that $mathcal Oleft(sum_k=n+1^infty frac1k^2right)$ because $$frac1(n+1)(n+2)leq frac1(n+1)^2,quad frac1(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)leq frac1(n+2)^2,quad frac1(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+4)leqfrac1(n+3)^2 cdots$$



and so $frac1(n+1)(n+2)cdots(n+k)leq frac1(n+k)^2$. But suppose we could only prove that $$frac1(n+1)(n+2)cdots(n+k)leq fracC_k(n+k)^2,$$
i.e. that the constant depend on $k$ and we can't have a uniform bound. Could I conclude that $$ frac1(n+1)(n+2)+frac1(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)+cdots=mathcal Oleft(sum_k=n+1^infty frac1k^2right) ?$$







share|cite|improve this question





















  • What do you mean by "find an equivalent to"? It seems to me that the expression is $frac(n-1)!e(n-1)!$.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Jul 30 at 20:28











  • an equivalent of $u_n$ is a sequence $v_n$ s.t. $u_n/v_nto 1$. @A.Pongrácz
    – Peter
    Jul 30 at 20:30















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I would like to find an equivalent of $sum_k=n^infty frac1k!$. Can I do as follow ? (since I always have doubt with those $o$ and $O$, I would like your opinion.



$$n!sum_k=n^infty frac1k!=1+frac1n+1+frac1(n+1)(n+2)+frac1(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)+cdots$$
$$=1+frac1n+1+mathcal Oleft(sum_k=n+1^infty frac1k^2right)=1+o(1).$$
and thus the claim follow.



Q1) Is it correct ?



Q2)



I have that $mathcal Oleft(sum_k=n+1^infty frac1k^2right)$ because $$frac1(n+1)(n+2)leq frac1(n+1)^2,quad frac1(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)leq frac1(n+2)^2,quad frac1(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+4)leqfrac1(n+3)^2 cdots$$



and so $frac1(n+1)(n+2)cdots(n+k)leq frac1(n+k)^2$. But suppose we could only prove that $$frac1(n+1)(n+2)cdots(n+k)leq fracC_k(n+k)^2,$$
i.e. that the constant depend on $k$ and we can't have a uniform bound. Could I conclude that $$ frac1(n+1)(n+2)+frac1(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)+cdots=mathcal Oleft(sum_k=n+1^infty frac1k^2right) ?$$







share|cite|improve this question





















  • What do you mean by "find an equivalent to"? It seems to me that the expression is $frac(n-1)!e(n-1)!$.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Jul 30 at 20:28











  • an equivalent of $u_n$ is a sequence $v_n$ s.t. $u_n/v_nto 1$. @A.Pongrácz
    – Peter
    Jul 30 at 20:30













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I would like to find an equivalent of $sum_k=n^infty frac1k!$. Can I do as follow ? (since I always have doubt with those $o$ and $O$, I would like your opinion.



$$n!sum_k=n^infty frac1k!=1+frac1n+1+frac1(n+1)(n+2)+frac1(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)+cdots$$
$$=1+frac1n+1+mathcal Oleft(sum_k=n+1^infty frac1k^2right)=1+o(1).$$
and thus the claim follow.



Q1) Is it correct ?



Q2)



I have that $mathcal Oleft(sum_k=n+1^infty frac1k^2right)$ because $$frac1(n+1)(n+2)leq frac1(n+1)^2,quad frac1(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)leq frac1(n+2)^2,quad frac1(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+4)leqfrac1(n+3)^2 cdots$$



and so $frac1(n+1)(n+2)cdots(n+k)leq frac1(n+k)^2$. But suppose we could only prove that $$frac1(n+1)(n+2)cdots(n+k)leq fracC_k(n+k)^2,$$
i.e. that the constant depend on $k$ and we can't have a uniform bound. Could I conclude that $$ frac1(n+1)(n+2)+frac1(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)+cdots=mathcal Oleft(sum_k=n+1^infty frac1k^2right) ?$$







share|cite|improve this question













I would like to find an equivalent of $sum_k=n^infty frac1k!$. Can I do as follow ? (since I always have doubt with those $o$ and $O$, I would like your opinion.



$$n!sum_k=n^infty frac1k!=1+frac1n+1+frac1(n+1)(n+2)+frac1(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)+cdots$$
$$=1+frac1n+1+mathcal Oleft(sum_k=n+1^infty frac1k^2right)=1+o(1).$$
and thus the claim follow.



Q1) Is it correct ?



Q2)



I have that $mathcal Oleft(sum_k=n+1^infty frac1k^2right)$ because $$frac1(n+1)(n+2)leq frac1(n+1)^2,quad frac1(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)leq frac1(n+2)^2,quad frac1(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+4)leqfrac1(n+3)^2 cdots$$



and so $frac1(n+1)(n+2)cdots(n+k)leq frac1(n+k)^2$. But suppose we could only prove that $$frac1(n+1)(n+2)cdots(n+k)leq fracC_k(n+k)^2,$$
i.e. that the constant depend on $k$ and we can't have a uniform bound. Could I conclude that $$ frac1(n+1)(n+2)+frac1(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)+cdots=mathcal Oleft(sum_k=n+1^infty frac1k^2right) ?$$









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 30 at 20:26









Michael Hardy

204k23185460




204k23185460









asked Jul 30 at 20:20









Peter

326112




326112











  • What do you mean by "find an equivalent to"? It seems to me that the expression is $frac(n-1)!e(n-1)!$.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Jul 30 at 20:28











  • an equivalent of $u_n$ is a sequence $v_n$ s.t. $u_n/v_nto 1$. @A.Pongrácz
    – Peter
    Jul 30 at 20:30

















  • What do you mean by "find an equivalent to"? It seems to me that the expression is $frac(n-1)!e(n-1)!$.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Jul 30 at 20:28











  • an equivalent of $u_n$ is a sequence $v_n$ s.t. $u_n/v_nto 1$. @A.Pongrácz
    – Peter
    Jul 30 at 20:30
















What do you mean by "find an equivalent to"? It seems to me that the expression is $frac(n-1)!e(n-1)!$.
– A. Pongrácz
Jul 30 at 20:28





What do you mean by "find an equivalent to"? It seems to me that the expression is $frac(n-1)!e(n-1)!$.
– A. Pongrácz
Jul 30 at 20:28













an equivalent of $u_n$ is a sequence $v_n$ s.t. $u_n/v_nto 1$. @A.Pongrácz
– Peter
Jul 30 at 20:30





an equivalent of $u_n$ is a sequence $v_n$ s.t. $u_n/v_nto 1$. @A.Pongrácz
– Peter
Jul 30 at 20:30











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
-1
down vote













See this post: Calculate $lim_n rightarrow infty$ ($n!e-[n!e]$)?



It follows that the integer part of $(n-1)!e$ is $(n-1)!sumlimits_k=1^n-1 frac1k!$, so the fractional part of $(n-1)!e$ is $(n-1)!sumlimits_k=n^infty frac1k!$.
Hence, an equivalent expression is $frac(n-1)!e(n-1)!$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Sorry but it doesn't answer my question. I know it's equivalent. I just want to know if my method is correct, and if my Q2) is right.
    – Peter
    Jul 31 at 7:25










  • Actually, it does. If you check the post I linked, the same calcualtion is also carried out there, showing that your calculation is correct. Your question was not specific. You answer was that $frac1n!$ is asymptotically equal to the expression, mine was that $frac(n-1)!e(n-1)!$ is EQUAL to the expression. As the question was not concrete, anyone can pick their favourite answer, and I prefer mine to yours. With that being said, yours was also correct.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Jul 31 at 9:56










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2867379%2ffind-an-equivalent-to-sum-k-n-infty-frac1k%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
-1
down vote













See this post: Calculate $lim_n rightarrow infty$ ($n!e-[n!e]$)?



It follows that the integer part of $(n-1)!e$ is $(n-1)!sumlimits_k=1^n-1 frac1k!$, so the fractional part of $(n-1)!e$ is $(n-1)!sumlimits_k=n^infty frac1k!$.
Hence, an equivalent expression is $frac(n-1)!e(n-1)!$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Sorry but it doesn't answer my question. I know it's equivalent. I just want to know if my method is correct, and if my Q2) is right.
    – Peter
    Jul 31 at 7:25










  • Actually, it does. If you check the post I linked, the same calcualtion is also carried out there, showing that your calculation is correct. Your question was not specific. You answer was that $frac1n!$ is asymptotically equal to the expression, mine was that $frac(n-1)!e(n-1)!$ is EQUAL to the expression. As the question was not concrete, anyone can pick their favourite answer, and I prefer mine to yours. With that being said, yours was also correct.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Jul 31 at 9:56














up vote
-1
down vote













See this post: Calculate $lim_n rightarrow infty$ ($n!e-[n!e]$)?



It follows that the integer part of $(n-1)!e$ is $(n-1)!sumlimits_k=1^n-1 frac1k!$, so the fractional part of $(n-1)!e$ is $(n-1)!sumlimits_k=n^infty frac1k!$.
Hence, an equivalent expression is $frac(n-1)!e(n-1)!$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Sorry but it doesn't answer my question. I know it's equivalent. I just want to know if my method is correct, and if my Q2) is right.
    – Peter
    Jul 31 at 7:25










  • Actually, it does. If you check the post I linked, the same calcualtion is also carried out there, showing that your calculation is correct. Your question was not specific. You answer was that $frac1n!$ is asymptotically equal to the expression, mine was that $frac(n-1)!e(n-1)!$ is EQUAL to the expression. As the question was not concrete, anyone can pick their favourite answer, and I prefer mine to yours. With that being said, yours was also correct.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Jul 31 at 9:56












up vote
-1
down vote










up vote
-1
down vote









See this post: Calculate $lim_n rightarrow infty$ ($n!e-[n!e]$)?



It follows that the integer part of $(n-1)!e$ is $(n-1)!sumlimits_k=1^n-1 frac1k!$, so the fractional part of $(n-1)!e$ is $(n-1)!sumlimits_k=n^infty frac1k!$.
Hence, an equivalent expression is $frac(n-1)!e(n-1)!$.






share|cite|improve this answer













See this post: Calculate $lim_n rightarrow infty$ ($n!e-[n!e]$)?



It follows that the integer part of $(n-1)!e$ is $(n-1)!sumlimits_k=1^n-1 frac1k!$, so the fractional part of $(n-1)!e$ is $(n-1)!sumlimits_k=n^infty frac1k!$.
Hence, an equivalent expression is $frac(n-1)!e(n-1)!$.







share|cite|improve this answer













share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer











answered Jul 31 at 5:17









A. Pongrácz

1,309115




1,309115











  • Sorry but it doesn't answer my question. I know it's equivalent. I just want to know if my method is correct, and if my Q2) is right.
    – Peter
    Jul 31 at 7:25










  • Actually, it does. If you check the post I linked, the same calcualtion is also carried out there, showing that your calculation is correct. Your question was not specific. You answer was that $frac1n!$ is asymptotically equal to the expression, mine was that $frac(n-1)!e(n-1)!$ is EQUAL to the expression. As the question was not concrete, anyone can pick their favourite answer, and I prefer mine to yours. With that being said, yours was also correct.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Jul 31 at 9:56
















  • Sorry but it doesn't answer my question. I know it's equivalent. I just want to know if my method is correct, and if my Q2) is right.
    – Peter
    Jul 31 at 7:25










  • Actually, it does. If you check the post I linked, the same calcualtion is also carried out there, showing that your calculation is correct. Your question was not specific. You answer was that $frac1n!$ is asymptotically equal to the expression, mine was that $frac(n-1)!e(n-1)!$ is EQUAL to the expression. As the question was not concrete, anyone can pick their favourite answer, and I prefer mine to yours. With that being said, yours was also correct.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Jul 31 at 9:56















Sorry but it doesn't answer my question. I know it's equivalent. I just want to know if my method is correct, and if my Q2) is right.
– Peter
Jul 31 at 7:25




Sorry but it doesn't answer my question. I know it's equivalent. I just want to know if my method is correct, and if my Q2) is right.
– Peter
Jul 31 at 7:25












Actually, it does. If you check the post I linked, the same calcualtion is also carried out there, showing that your calculation is correct. Your question was not specific. You answer was that $frac1n!$ is asymptotically equal to the expression, mine was that $frac(n-1)!e(n-1)!$ is EQUAL to the expression. As the question was not concrete, anyone can pick their favourite answer, and I prefer mine to yours. With that being said, yours was also correct.
– A. Pongrácz
Jul 31 at 9:56




Actually, it does. If you check the post I linked, the same calcualtion is also carried out there, showing that your calculation is correct. Your question was not specific. You answer was that $frac1n!$ is asymptotically equal to the expression, mine was that $frac(n-1)!e(n-1)!$ is EQUAL to the expression. As the question was not concrete, anyone can pick their favourite answer, and I prefer mine to yours. With that being said, yours was also correct.
– A. Pongrácz
Jul 31 at 9:56












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2867379%2ffind-an-equivalent-to-sum-k-n-infty-frac1k%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?