Fixed point only solution to this sequence? [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












I'm trying to show convergence of a sequence, and I reduced the problem to proving that the fixed point a = a'' = a''' = ... ad infimum is the only solution to this problem.



a' - (1+r)a = a'' - (1+r)a' = a''' - (1+r)a'' = ... ad infimum



If that helps, we can assume that if it's not a fixed point, it has to be monotonic. Any idea? I tried finding a contradiction for both cases a > a' > a'' > ... and the opposite. However, I can't.



Clearly, it is a solution, what I need to show is that it is unique



Any help appreciated. Thanks.



Edit: Delete this, it is clearly not unique...







share|cite|improve this question











closed as unclear what you're asking by amWhy, Xander Henderson, Isaac Browne, Leucippus, Taroccoesbrocco Jul 31 at 8:31


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


















    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    I'm trying to show convergence of a sequence, and I reduced the problem to proving that the fixed point a = a'' = a''' = ... ad infimum is the only solution to this problem.



    a' - (1+r)a = a'' - (1+r)a' = a''' - (1+r)a'' = ... ad infimum



    If that helps, we can assume that if it's not a fixed point, it has to be monotonic. Any idea? I tried finding a contradiction for both cases a > a' > a'' > ... and the opposite. However, I can't.



    Clearly, it is a solution, what I need to show is that it is unique



    Any help appreciated. Thanks.



    Edit: Delete this, it is clearly not unique...







    share|cite|improve this question











    closed as unclear what you're asking by amWhy, Xander Henderson, Isaac Browne, Leucippus, Taroccoesbrocco Jul 31 at 8:31


    Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      I'm trying to show convergence of a sequence, and I reduced the problem to proving that the fixed point a = a'' = a''' = ... ad infimum is the only solution to this problem.



      a' - (1+r)a = a'' - (1+r)a' = a''' - (1+r)a'' = ... ad infimum



      If that helps, we can assume that if it's not a fixed point, it has to be monotonic. Any idea? I tried finding a contradiction for both cases a > a' > a'' > ... and the opposite. However, I can't.



      Clearly, it is a solution, what I need to show is that it is unique



      Any help appreciated. Thanks.



      Edit: Delete this, it is clearly not unique...







      share|cite|improve this question











      I'm trying to show convergence of a sequence, and I reduced the problem to proving that the fixed point a = a'' = a''' = ... ad infimum is the only solution to this problem.



      a' - (1+r)a = a'' - (1+r)a' = a''' - (1+r)a'' = ... ad infimum



      If that helps, we can assume that if it's not a fixed point, it has to be monotonic. Any idea? I tried finding a contradiction for both cases a > a' > a'' > ... and the opposite. However, I can't.



      Clearly, it is a solution, what I need to show is that it is unique



      Any help appreciated. Thanks.



      Edit: Delete this, it is clearly not unique...









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 31 at 0:31









      john john

      1




      1




      closed as unclear what you're asking by amWhy, Xander Henderson, Isaac Browne, Leucippus, Taroccoesbrocco Jul 31 at 8:31


      Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






      closed as unclear what you're asking by amWhy, Xander Henderson, Isaac Browne, Leucippus, Taroccoesbrocco Jul 31 at 8:31


      Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Taking your first equality we see
          $$a'-(1+r)a=a''-(1+r)a'\a''=(1+r)a-ra'$$
          and similarly with more primes on the $a$s. It would be more conventional to write the variables as $A(n)$ where $n$ is the number of primes and you have a homogeneous recurrence relation
          $$A(n+2)=-rA(n+1)+(1+r)A(n)$$
          The general solution is to substitute in $A(n)=bk^n$ and get the characteristic equation $$k^2=-rk+(1-r)\k^2+rk-1-r=0\(k-1)(k-(r+1))=0$$
          with the solution $$A(n)=c1^n+d(r+1)^n$$
          If your initial conditions are carefully chosen, you will have $d=0$ and all the $A(n)=c$






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Taking your first equality we see
            $$a'-(1+r)a=a''-(1+r)a'\a''=(1+r)a-ra'$$
            and similarly with more primes on the $a$s. It would be more conventional to write the variables as $A(n)$ where $n$ is the number of primes and you have a homogeneous recurrence relation
            $$A(n+2)=-rA(n+1)+(1+r)A(n)$$
            The general solution is to substitute in $A(n)=bk^n$ and get the characteristic equation $$k^2=-rk+(1-r)\k^2+rk-1-r=0\(k-1)(k-(r+1))=0$$
            with the solution $$A(n)=c1^n+d(r+1)^n$$
            If your initial conditions are carefully chosen, you will have $d=0$ and all the $A(n)=c$






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Taking your first equality we see
              $$a'-(1+r)a=a''-(1+r)a'\a''=(1+r)a-ra'$$
              and similarly with more primes on the $a$s. It would be more conventional to write the variables as $A(n)$ where $n$ is the number of primes and you have a homogeneous recurrence relation
              $$A(n+2)=-rA(n+1)+(1+r)A(n)$$
              The general solution is to substitute in $A(n)=bk^n$ and get the characteristic equation $$k^2=-rk+(1-r)\k^2+rk-1-r=0\(k-1)(k-(r+1))=0$$
              with the solution $$A(n)=c1^n+d(r+1)^n$$
              If your initial conditions are carefully chosen, you will have $d=0$ and all the $A(n)=c$






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                0
                down vote










                up vote
                0
                down vote









                Taking your first equality we see
                $$a'-(1+r)a=a''-(1+r)a'\a''=(1+r)a-ra'$$
                and similarly with more primes on the $a$s. It would be more conventional to write the variables as $A(n)$ where $n$ is the number of primes and you have a homogeneous recurrence relation
                $$A(n+2)=-rA(n+1)+(1+r)A(n)$$
                The general solution is to substitute in $A(n)=bk^n$ and get the characteristic equation $$k^2=-rk+(1-r)\k^2+rk-1-r=0\(k-1)(k-(r+1))=0$$
                with the solution $$A(n)=c1^n+d(r+1)^n$$
                If your initial conditions are carefully chosen, you will have $d=0$ and all the $A(n)=c$






                share|cite|improve this answer













                Taking your first equality we see
                $$a'-(1+r)a=a''-(1+r)a'\a''=(1+r)a-ra'$$
                and similarly with more primes on the $a$s. It would be more conventional to write the variables as $A(n)$ where $n$ is the number of primes and you have a homogeneous recurrence relation
                $$A(n+2)=-rA(n+1)+(1+r)A(n)$$
                The general solution is to substitute in $A(n)=bk^n$ and get the characteristic equation $$k^2=-rk+(1-r)\k^2+rk-1-r=0\(k-1)(k-(r+1))=0$$
                with the solution $$A(n)=c1^n+d(r+1)^n$$
                If your initial conditions are carefully chosen, you will have $d=0$ and all the $A(n)=c$







                share|cite|improve this answer













                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer











                answered Jul 31 at 3:45









                Ross Millikan

                275k21184351




                275k21184351












                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                    Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                    Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?