How to show linear independence of three elements connected by a linear transformation.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
4












Let $V$ be a three dimensional vector space over the field $mathbbQ.$ Suppose $T: V to V$ be a linear transformation and $T(x)=y,$ $T(y)=z,$ $T(z)=x+y,$ for certain $x,y,z in V,x neq0.$ Prove that $x,y$ and $z$ are linearly independent.



What I did: Consider a linear homogeneous relation $ax+by+cz=0$ for $a,b,c in mathbbQ.$ Since $xneq0,$ we also have $z-x neq 0.$ We also get $(aI + bT +cT^2)(x)=0.$ After that I cannot conclude anything. I need some help.







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    4












    Let $V$ be a three dimensional vector space over the field $mathbbQ.$ Suppose $T: V to V$ be a linear transformation and $T(x)=y,$ $T(y)=z,$ $T(z)=x+y,$ for certain $x,y,z in V,x neq0.$ Prove that $x,y$ and $z$ are linearly independent.



    What I did: Consider a linear homogeneous relation $ax+by+cz=0$ for $a,b,c in mathbbQ.$ Since $xneq0,$ we also have $z-x neq 0.$ We also get $(aI + bT +cT^2)(x)=0.$ After that I cannot conclude anything. I need some help.







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      4









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      4






      4





      Let $V$ be a three dimensional vector space over the field $mathbbQ.$ Suppose $T: V to V$ be a linear transformation and $T(x)=y,$ $T(y)=z,$ $T(z)=x+y,$ for certain $x,y,z in V,x neq0.$ Prove that $x,y$ and $z$ are linearly independent.



      What I did: Consider a linear homogeneous relation $ax+by+cz=0$ for $a,b,c in mathbbQ.$ Since $xneq0,$ we also have $z-x neq 0.$ We also get $(aI + bT +cT^2)(x)=0.$ After that I cannot conclude anything. I need some help.







      share|cite|improve this question











      Let $V$ be a three dimensional vector space over the field $mathbbQ.$ Suppose $T: V to V$ be a linear transformation and $T(x)=y,$ $T(y)=z,$ $T(z)=x+y,$ for certain $x,y,z in V,x neq0.$ Prove that $x,y$ and $z$ are linearly independent.



      What I did: Consider a linear homogeneous relation $ax+by+cz=0$ for $a,b,c in mathbbQ.$ Since $xneq0,$ we also have $z-x neq 0.$ We also get $(aI + bT +cT^2)(x)=0.$ After that I cannot conclude anything. I need some help.









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 30 at 18:26









      user371231

      411410




      411410




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Note: I'm not sure I ever use that $V$ is 3-dimensional below. This makes me concerned; be warned. But I'm pretty convinced the argument is correct.



          First let's show that $x$ and $y$ are linearly independent. Proceed by contradiction. Suppose instead $x$ and $y$ are linearly dependent, which means that $y=ax$ for some $a in mathbbQ$ (since $x$ is not zero, $x$ and $y$ linearly dependent $Rightarrow y = ax$ for some $a in mathbbQ$).



          Now $z = T(y) = T(ax) = aT(x) = a^2x$. And $x+y = T(z) = T(a^2x) = a^3x$. So $a^3x = x+y = x+ax Rightarrow (a^3-a-1)x = mathbf0$. Since $x$ is not $mathbf0$, we must have that $a^3 - a + 1 = 0 $; but this is impossible for $a in mathbbQ$ (by the rational root theorem, checking that $pm 1$ are not roots).



          Ok so we've shown that $x$ and $y$ must be linearly independent.



          Let's now show that $x$, $y$, and $z$ are linearly independent. Proceed by contradiction again. Suppose instead that $x$, $y$, and $z$ are linearly dependent, which means that $z = ax + by$ for some $a,b in mathbbQ$ (since we know $x$ and $y$ are linearly independent, we can guarantee this is possible).



          Now
          $$x+y = T(z) = T(ax + by) = aT(x) + bT(y) = ay + bz = ay + b(ax+by) = (ab)x + (a+b^2)y.$$
          Rearranging gives $(ab-1)x + (a+b^2-1)y = mathbf0$. Since $x$ and $y$ are linearly independent, we have then that $ab-1 = 0$ and $a+b^2-1 = 0$.



          Now $ab-1 = 0 Rightarrow ab = 1 Rightarrow b = 1/a$ and $a neq 0$ and $b neq 0$.



          Plugging this into the second equation, we have $a + (1/a)^2 - 1 = 0 Rightarrow a^3 - a^2 + 1 = 0$. And again, this is impossible for $a in mathbbQ$ (by the rational root theorem).






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2867282%2fhow-to-show-linear-independence-of-three-elements-connected-by-a-linear-transfor%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            0
            down vote



            accepted










            Note: I'm not sure I ever use that $V$ is 3-dimensional below. This makes me concerned; be warned. But I'm pretty convinced the argument is correct.



            First let's show that $x$ and $y$ are linearly independent. Proceed by contradiction. Suppose instead $x$ and $y$ are linearly dependent, which means that $y=ax$ for some $a in mathbbQ$ (since $x$ is not zero, $x$ and $y$ linearly dependent $Rightarrow y = ax$ for some $a in mathbbQ$).



            Now $z = T(y) = T(ax) = aT(x) = a^2x$. And $x+y = T(z) = T(a^2x) = a^3x$. So $a^3x = x+y = x+ax Rightarrow (a^3-a-1)x = mathbf0$. Since $x$ is not $mathbf0$, we must have that $a^3 - a + 1 = 0 $; but this is impossible for $a in mathbbQ$ (by the rational root theorem, checking that $pm 1$ are not roots).



            Ok so we've shown that $x$ and $y$ must be linearly independent.



            Let's now show that $x$, $y$, and $z$ are linearly independent. Proceed by contradiction again. Suppose instead that $x$, $y$, and $z$ are linearly dependent, which means that $z = ax + by$ for some $a,b in mathbbQ$ (since we know $x$ and $y$ are linearly independent, we can guarantee this is possible).



            Now
            $$x+y = T(z) = T(ax + by) = aT(x) + bT(y) = ay + bz = ay + b(ax+by) = (ab)x + (a+b^2)y.$$
            Rearranging gives $(ab-1)x + (a+b^2-1)y = mathbf0$. Since $x$ and $y$ are linearly independent, we have then that $ab-1 = 0$ and $a+b^2-1 = 0$.



            Now $ab-1 = 0 Rightarrow ab = 1 Rightarrow b = 1/a$ and $a neq 0$ and $b neq 0$.



            Plugging this into the second equation, we have $a + (1/a)^2 - 1 = 0 Rightarrow a^3 - a^2 + 1 = 0$. And again, this is impossible for $a in mathbbQ$ (by the rational root theorem).






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              0
              down vote



              accepted










              Note: I'm not sure I ever use that $V$ is 3-dimensional below. This makes me concerned; be warned. But I'm pretty convinced the argument is correct.



              First let's show that $x$ and $y$ are linearly independent. Proceed by contradiction. Suppose instead $x$ and $y$ are linearly dependent, which means that $y=ax$ for some $a in mathbbQ$ (since $x$ is not zero, $x$ and $y$ linearly dependent $Rightarrow y = ax$ for some $a in mathbbQ$).



              Now $z = T(y) = T(ax) = aT(x) = a^2x$. And $x+y = T(z) = T(a^2x) = a^3x$. So $a^3x = x+y = x+ax Rightarrow (a^3-a-1)x = mathbf0$. Since $x$ is not $mathbf0$, we must have that $a^3 - a + 1 = 0 $; but this is impossible for $a in mathbbQ$ (by the rational root theorem, checking that $pm 1$ are not roots).



              Ok so we've shown that $x$ and $y$ must be linearly independent.



              Let's now show that $x$, $y$, and $z$ are linearly independent. Proceed by contradiction again. Suppose instead that $x$, $y$, and $z$ are linearly dependent, which means that $z = ax + by$ for some $a,b in mathbbQ$ (since we know $x$ and $y$ are linearly independent, we can guarantee this is possible).



              Now
              $$x+y = T(z) = T(ax + by) = aT(x) + bT(y) = ay + bz = ay + b(ax+by) = (ab)x + (a+b^2)y.$$
              Rearranging gives $(ab-1)x + (a+b^2-1)y = mathbf0$. Since $x$ and $y$ are linearly independent, we have then that $ab-1 = 0$ and $a+b^2-1 = 0$.



              Now $ab-1 = 0 Rightarrow ab = 1 Rightarrow b = 1/a$ and $a neq 0$ and $b neq 0$.



              Plugging this into the second equation, we have $a + (1/a)^2 - 1 = 0 Rightarrow a^3 - a^2 + 1 = 0$. And again, this is impossible for $a in mathbbQ$ (by the rational root theorem).






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                0
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                0
                down vote



                accepted






                Note: I'm not sure I ever use that $V$ is 3-dimensional below. This makes me concerned; be warned. But I'm pretty convinced the argument is correct.



                First let's show that $x$ and $y$ are linearly independent. Proceed by contradiction. Suppose instead $x$ and $y$ are linearly dependent, which means that $y=ax$ for some $a in mathbbQ$ (since $x$ is not zero, $x$ and $y$ linearly dependent $Rightarrow y = ax$ for some $a in mathbbQ$).



                Now $z = T(y) = T(ax) = aT(x) = a^2x$. And $x+y = T(z) = T(a^2x) = a^3x$. So $a^3x = x+y = x+ax Rightarrow (a^3-a-1)x = mathbf0$. Since $x$ is not $mathbf0$, we must have that $a^3 - a + 1 = 0 $; but this is impossible for $a in mathbbQ$ (by the rational root theorem, checking that $pm 1$ are not roots).



                Ok so we've shown that $x$ and $y$ must be linearly independent.



                Let's now show that $x$, $y$, and $z$ are linearly independent. Proceed by contradiction again. Suppose instead that $x$, $y$, and $z$ are linearly dependent, which means that $z = ax + by$ for some $a,b in mathbbQ$ (since we know $x$ and $y$ are linearly independent, we can guarantee this is possible).



                Now
                $$x+y = T(z) = T(ax + by) = aT(x) + bT(y) = ay + bz = ay + b(ax+by) = (ab)x + (a+b^2)y.$$
                Rearranging gives $(ab-1)x + (a+b^2-1)y = mathbf0$. Since $x$ and $y$ are linearly independent, we have then that $ab-1 = 0$ and $a+b^2-1 = 0$.



                Now $ab-1 = 0 Rightarrow ab = 1 Rightarrow b = 1/a$ and $a neq 0$ and $b neq 0$.



                Plugging this into the second equation, we have $a + (1/a)^2 - 1 = 0 Rightarrow a^3 - a^2 + 1 = 0$. And again, this is impossible for $a in mathbbQ$ (by the rational root theorem).






                share|cite|improve this answer













                Note: I'm not sure I ever use that $V$ is 3-dimensional below. This makes me concerned; be warned. But I'm pretty convinced the argument is correct.



                First let's show that $x$ and $y$ are linearly independent. Proceed by contradiction. Suppose instead $x$ and $y$ are linearly dependent, which means that $y=ax$ for some $a in mathbbQ$ (since $x$ is not zero, $x$ and $y$ linearly dependent $Rightarrow y = ax$ for some $a in mathbbQ$).



                Now $z = T(y) = T(ax) = aT(x) = a^2x$. And $x+y = T(z) = T(a^2x) = a^3x$. So $a^3x = x+y = x+ax Rightarrow (a^3-a-1)x = mathbf0$. Since $x$ is not $mathbf0$, we must have that $a^3 - a + 1 = 0 $; but this is impossible for $a in mathbbQ$ (by the rational root theorem, checking that $pm 1$ are not roots).



                Ok so we've shown that $x$ and $y$ must be linearly independent.



                Let's now show that $x$, $y$, and $z$ are linearly independent. Proceed by contradiction again. Suppose instead that $x$, $y$, and $z$ are linearly dependent, which means that $z = ax + by$ for some $a,b in mathbbQ$ (since we know $x$ and $y$ are linearly independent, we can guarantee this is possible).



                Now
                $$x+y = T(z) = T(ax + by) = aT(x) + bT(y) = ay + bz = ay + b(ax+by) = (ab)x + (a+b^2)y.$$
                Rearranging gives $(ab-1)x + (a+b^2-1)y = mathbf0$. Since $x$ and $y$ are linearly independent, we have then that $ab-1 = 0$ and $a+b^2-1 = 0$.



                Now $ab-1 = 0 Rightarrow ab = 1 Rightarrow b = 1/a$ and $a neq 0$ and $b neq 0$.



                Plugging this into the second equation, we have $a + (1/a)^2 - 1 = 0 Rightarrow a^3 - a^2 + 1 = 0$. And again, this is impossible for $a in mathbbQ$ (by the rational root theorem).







                share|cite|improve this answer













                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer











                answered Jul 31 at 4:46









                xmq

                534




                534






















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2867282%2fhow-to-show-linear-independence-of-three-elements-connected-by-a-linear-transfor%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                    Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                    Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?