If $Hleq G$, then $BH to BG$ is a fiber bundle with fiber $G/H$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Suppose $G$ is a topological group and $Hleq G$ is a closed subgroup. The inclusion $Hto G$ induces a map on classifying spaces $BHto BG$. I've seen in some sources that $BHto BG$ is actually a fiber bundle with fiber $G/H$, for example in the following notes PDF, Proposition 2.15 on the bottom of page 59.



I understand the reasoning to be as follows. It's a general fact that $EGto (EG)/H$ is a principal $H$-bundle, and since $EG$ is contractible, we know that $EGto (EG)/H$ is the universal $G$-bundle. Therefore $(EG)/H$ is homotopy equivalent to $BH$.



It's also a general fact that $(EG)/H to B$ is a fiber bundle with fiber $G/H$. However, I feel like we can't just replace $(EG)/H$ with $BH$ in this context, since they are only homotopy equivalent. And, in the PDF above, the author write $(EG)/H = BH$, which is perplexing.



Here's another confusion I have with this statement. Take $H$ to be the trivial group. Then $BHto BG$ should be a fiber bundle for all (reasonable) topological groups $G$. But this fishy to me. I find it hard to believe that, at the very least, $BH$ surjects onto $BG$ for any $G$.



How can I reconcile these issues?







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    Suppose $G$ is a topological group and $Hleq G$ is a closed subgroup. The inclusion $Hto G$ induces a map on classifying spaces $BHto BG$. I've seen in some sources that $BHto BG$ is actually a fiber bundle with fiber $G/H$, for example in the following notes PDF, Proposition 2.15 on the bottom of page 59.



    I understand the reasoning to be as follows. It's a general fact that $EGto (EG)/H$ is a principal $H$-bundle, and since $EG$ is contractible, we know that $EGto (EG)/H$ is the universal $G$-bundle. Therefore $(EG)/H$ is homotopy equivalent to $BH$.



    It's also a general fact that $(EG)/H to B$ is a fiber bundle with fiber $G/H$. However, I feel like we can't just replace $(EG)/H$ with $BH$ in this context, since they are only homotopy equivalent. And, in the PDF above, the author write $(EG)/H = BH$, which is perplexing.



    Here's another confusion I have with this statement. Take $H$ to be the trivial group. Then $BHto BG$ should be a fiber bundle for all (reasonable) topological groups $G$. But this fishy to me. I find it hard to believe that, at the very least, $BH$ surjects onto $BG$ for any $G$.



    How can I reconcile these issues?







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      Suppose $G$ is a topological group and $Hleq G$ is a closed subgroup. The inclusion $Hto G$ induces a map on classifying spaces $BHto BG$. I've seen in some sources that $BHto BG$ is actually a fiber bundle with fiber $G/H$, for example in the following notes PDF, Proposition 2.15 on the bottom of page 59.



      I understand the reasoning to be as follows. It's a general fact that $EGto (EG)/H$ is a principal $H$-bundle, and since $EG$ is contractible, we know that $EGto (EG)/H$ is the universal $G$-bundle. Therefore $(EG)/H$ is homotopy equivalent to $BH$.



      It's also a general fact that $(EG)/H to B$ is a fiber bundle with fiber $G/H$. However, I feel like we can't just replace $(EG)/H$ with $BH$ in this context, since they are only homotopy equivalent. And, in the PDF above, the author write $(EG)/H = BH$, which is perplexing.



      Here's another confusion I have with this statement. Take $H$ to be the trivial group. Then $BHto BG$ should be a fiber bundle for all (reasonable) topological groups $G$. But this fishy to me. I find it hard to believe that, at the very least, $BH$ surjects onto $BG$ for any $G$.



      How can I reconcile these issues?







      share|cite|improve this question











      Suppose $G$ is a topological group and $Hleq G$ is a closed subgroup. The inclusion $Hto G$ induces a map on classifying spaces $BHto BG$. I've seen in some sources that $BHto BG$ is actually a fiber bundle with fiber $G/H$, for example in the following notes PDF, Proposition 2.15 on the bottom of page 59.



      I understand the reasoning to be as follows. It's a general fact that $EGto (EG)/H$ is a principal $H$-bundle, and since $EG$ is contractible, we know that $EGto (EG)/H$ is the universal $G$-bundle. Therefore $(EG)/H$ is homotopy equivalent to $BH$.



      It's also a general fact that $(EG)/H to B$ is a fiber bundle with fiber $G/H$. However, I feel like we can't just replace $(EG)/H$ with $BH$ in this context, since they are only homotopy equivalent. And, in the PDF above, the author write $(EG)/H = BH$, which is perplexing.



      Here's another confusion I have with this statement. Take $H$ to be the trivial group. Then $BHto BG$ should be a fiber bundle for all (reasonable) topological groups $G$. But this fishy to me. I find it hard to believe that, at the very least, $BH$ surjects onto $BG$ for any $G$.



      How can I reconcile these issues?









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 17 at 18:33









      Ross

      213




      213




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          The statement "$BH to BG$ is a fiber bundle" is a type error; "fiber bundle" is a word you apply to a map between topological spaces, but $BH$ and $BG$ are homotopy types. Being a fiber bundle is not a homotopy-invariant notion, and in fact every map between, say, connected CW complexes is a fiber bundle up to homotopy equivalence.



          The homotopy-invariant statement is that the homotopy fiber of the map $BH to BG$ is $G/H$; this statement does not depend on a choice of a point-set model for $BH$ or $BG$. An equivalent statement is that you can always pick a choice of model for $BH$ and $BG$ such that $BH to BG$ (which here now refer to spaces) is a fiber bundle with fiber $G/H$.



          When $H$ is the trivial group, $BH$ is (homotopy equivalent to) a point, and so we conclude that the map $bullet to BG$ has homotopy fiber $G$. It's more generally true that if $X$ is path-connected then the homotopy fiber of $bullet to X$ is the loop space $Omega X$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2854792%2fif-h-leq-g-then-bh-to-bg-is-a-fiber-bundle-with-fiber-g-h%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote













            The statement "$BH to BG$ is a fiber bundle" is a type error; "fiber bundle" is a word you apply to a map between topological spaces, but $BH$ and $BG$ are homotopy types. Being a fiber bundle is not a homotopy-invariant notion, and in fact every map between, say, connected CW complexes is a fiber bundle up to homotopy equivalence.



            The homotopy-invariant statement is that the homotopy fiber of the map $BH to BG$ is $G/H$; this statement does not depend on a choice of a point-set model for $BH$ or $BG$. An equivalent statement is that you can always pick a choice of model for $BH$ and $BG$ such that $BH to BG$ (which here now refer to spaces) is a fiber bundle with fiber $G/H$.



            When $H$ is the trivial group, $BH$ is (homotopy equivalent to) a point, and so we conclude that the map $bullet to BG$ has homotopy fiber $G$. It's more generally true that if $X$ is path-connected then the homotopy fiber of $bullet to X$ is the loop space $Omega X$.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              2
              down vote













              The statement "$BH to BG$ is a fiber bundle" is a type error; "fiber bundle" is a word you apply to a map between topological spaces, but $BH$ and $BG$ are homotopy types. Being a fiber bundle is not a homotopy-invariant notion, and in fact every map between, say, connected CW complexes is a fiber bundle up to homotopy equivalence.



              The homotopy-invariant statement is that the homotopy fiber of the map $BH to BG$ is $G/H$; this statement does not depend on a choice of a point-set model for $BH$ or $BG$. An equivalent statement is that you can always pick a choice of model for $BH$ and $BG$ such that $BH to BG$ (which here now refer to spaces) is a fiber bundle with fiber $G/H$.



              When $H$ is the trivial group, $BH$ is (homotopy equivalent to) a point, and so we conclude that the map $bullet to BG$ has homotopy fiber $G$. It's more generally true that if $X$ is path-connected then the homotopy fiber of $bullet to X$ is the loop space $Omega X$.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                2
                down vote










                up vote
                2
                down vote









                The statement "$BH to BG$ is a fiber bundle" is a type error; "fiber bundle" is a word you apply to a map between topological spaces, but $BH$ and $BG$ are homotopy types. Being a fiber bundle is not a homotopy-invariant notion, and in fact every map between, say, connected CW complexes is a fiber bundle up to homotopy equivalence.



                The homotopy-invariant statement is that the homotopy fiber of the map $BH to BG$ is $G/H$; this statement does not depend on a choice of a point-set model for $BH$ or $BG$. An equivalent statement is that you can always pick a choice of model for $BH$ and $BG$ such that $BH to BG$ (which here now refer to spaces) is a fiber bundle with fiber $G/H$.



                When $H$ is the trivial group, $BH$ is (homotopy equivalent to) a point, and so we conclude that the map $bullet to BG$ has homotopy fiber $G$. It's more generally true that if $X$ is path-connected then the homotopy fiber of $bullet to X$ is the loop space $Omega X$.






                share|cite|improve this answer













                The statement "$BH to BG$ is a fiber bundle" is a type error; "fiber bundle" is a word you apply to a map between topological spaces, but $BH$ and $BG$ are homotopy types. Being a fiber bundle is not a homotopy-invariant notion, and in fact every map between, say, connected CW complexes is a fiber bundle up to homotopy equivalence.



                The homotopy-invariant statement is that the homotopy fiber of the map $BH to BG$ is $G/H$; this statement does not depend on a choice of a point-set model for $BH$ or $BG$. An equivalent statement is that you can always pick a choice of model for $BH$ and $BG$ such that $BH to BG$ (which here now refer to spaces) is a fiber bundle with fiber $G/H$.



                When $H$ is the trivial group, $BH$ is (homotopy equivalent to) a point, and so we conclude that the map $bullet to BG$ has homotopy fiber $G$. It's more generally true that if $X$ is path-connected then the homotopy fiber of $bullet to X$ is the loop space $Omega X$.







                share|cite|improve this answer













                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer











                answered Jul 17 at 18:38









                Qiaochu Yuan

                269k32564900




                269k32564900






















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2854792%2fif-h-leq-g-then-bh-to-bg-is-a-fiber-bundle-with-fiber-g-h%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                    Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                    Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?