If $x+h0$, why does $|x+h|-|x|=-h$?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
If $x+h<0$ and $h>0$
Why does
$|x+h|-|x|=-h$
I think I'm having difficulties with the absolute operator. How do I get rid of it to move on? And how does knowing that $x+h<0$ change how I can solve this?
algebra-precalculus
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
If $x+h<0$ and $h>0$
Why does
$|x+h|-|x|=-h$
I think I'm having difficulties with the absolute operator. How do I get rid of it to move on? And how does knowing that $x+h<0$ change how I can solve this?
algebra-precalculus
3
It doesn't, necessarily. For example, $|1 - 2| - |1| neq -(-2)$.
– Theo Bendit
Jul 18 at 0:39
1
Hi Theo, I did a mistake that was pointed out by Arnaud. I edited my question. Thank you
– Cedric Martens
Jul 18 at 0:44
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
If $x+h<0$ and $h>0$
Why does
$|x+h|-|x|=-h$
I think I'm having difficulties with the absolute operator. How do I get rid of it to move on? And how does knowing that $x+h<0$ change how I can solve this?
algebra-precalculus
If $x+h<0$ and $h>0$
Why does
$|x+h|-|x|=-h$
I think I'm having difficulties with the absolute operator. How do I get rid of it to move on? And how does knowing that $x+h<0$ change how I can solve this?
algebra-precalculus
edited Jul 18 at 0:43
asked Jul 18 at 0:36
Cedric Martens
286211
286211
3
It doesn't, necessarily. For example, $|1 - 2| - |1| neq -(-2)$.
– Theo Bendit
Jul 18 at 0:39
1
Hi Theo, I did a mistake that was pointed out by Arnaud. I edited my question. Thank you
– Cedric Martens
Jul 18 at 0:44
add a comment |Â
3
It doesn't, necessarily. For example, $|1 - 2| - |1| neq -(-2)$.
– Theo Bendit
Jul 18 at 0:39
1
Hi Theo, I did a mistake that was pointed out by Arnaud. I edited my question. Thank you
– Cedric Martens
Jul 18 at 0:44
3
3
It doesn't, necessarily. For example, $|1 - 2| - |1| neq -(-2)$.
– Theo Bendit
Jul 18 at 0:39
It doesn't, necessarily. For example, $|1 - 2| - |1| neq -(-2)$.
– Theo Bendit
Jul 18 at 0:39
1
1
Hi Theo, I did a mistake that was pointed out by Arnaud. I edited my question. Thank you
– Cedric Martens
Jul 18 at 0:44
Hi Theo, I did a mistake that was pointed out by Arnaud. I edited my question. Thank you
– Cedric Martens
Jul 18 at 0:44
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The absolute operator is defined as follows:
$$left|xright| = begincases
x & textif x geq 0 \
-x & textif x lt 0
endcases$$
In other words, if $x$ is positive (or zero), it stays the same. If $x$ is negative, then multiply it by $-1$ to make it positive.
When $h > 0$ and $x + h < 0$ (which happens when $|x| > h$, i.e. $x$ is "more negative" than $h$ is positive), you have $|x + h| = -(x + h) = -x - h$, and so $|x + h| - |x| = (-x - h) - (-x) = -x - h + x = -h$).
$$left|xright| = begincases x & textif x geq 0 \ -x & textif x lt 0 endcases$$ Although I knew what the absolute operator did, this really helped me understand why $|x+h| = -(x+h)$
– Cedric Martens
Jul 18 at 0:58
Glad to have helped!
– ConMan
Jul 18 at 3:20
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
If $x+h<0$ then all you can say is that $|x+h|=-x-h$.
Therefore what you are saying is that if $x+h<0$ then $-x-|x|=0$, or in other words $|x|=-x$.
Equivalently, you are saying that
if $x+h<0$ then $x<0$.
Can you see now why it is wrong?
It becomes true, however, if you add the requirement that $h>0$.
Yes I did omit that requirement of $h>0$, I will edit my question
– Cedric Martens
Jul 18 at 0:43
@CedricMartens If $h>0$, can you prove that $x+h<0implies x<0$?
– Arnaud Mortier
Jul 18 at 0:45
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
This is a follow-on previous question. Please read about absolute value. When $x+h lt 0, |x+h|=-(x+h)$ directly from the definition. With the condition $h gt 0$ the fact that $x+h lt 0$ guarantees that $x lt 0$ and $|x|gt h$. In that case $$|x+h|-|x|=-(x+h)-(-x)=-x-h+x=-h$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
We can get rid of some absolute since we know if it's positive/negative.
We have $-x-h-|x|=-h$ is what you're trying to prove which means
$x=-|x|.$ This simply means $x$ is not positive.
We have $|x-h|-|x|=-hiffx=-.$
This can be proved. Since $x+h<0$, $h>0,$ we have to have a positive plus a negative is less than $0,$ since a positive plus a nonnegative is still positive.
Therefore, we have proven that $x$ is negative, so $x=-|x|$ which proves $|x-h|-|x|=-h$ $boxedtextQ.E.D.$
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The absolute operator is defined as follows:
$$left|xright| = begincases
x & textif x geq 0 \
-x & textif x lt 0
endcases$$
In other words, if $x$ is positive (or zero), it stays the same. If $x$ is negative, then multiply it by $-1$ to make it positive.
When $h > 0$ and $x + h < 0$ (which happens when $|x| > h$, i.e. $x$ is "more negative" than $h$ is positive), you have $|x + h| = -(x + h) = -x - h$, and so $|x + h| - |x| = (-x - h) - (-x) = -x - h + x = -h$).
$$left|xright| = begincases x & textif x geq 0 \ -x & textif x lt 0 endcases$$ Although I knew what the absolute operator did, this really helped me understand why $|x+h| = -(x+h)$
– Cedric Martens
Jul 18 at 0:58
Glad to have helped!
– ConMan
Jul 18 at 3:20
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The absolute operator is defined as follows:
$$left|xright| = begincases
x & textif x geq 0 \
-x & textif x lt 0
endcases$$
In other words, if $x$ is positive (or zero), it stays the same. If $x$ is negative, then multiply it by $-1$ to make it positive.
When $h > 0$ and $x + h < 0$ (which happens when $|x| > h$, i.e. $x$ is "more negative" than $h$ is positive), you have $|x + h| = -(x + h) = -x - h$, and so $|x + h| - |x| = (-x - h) - (-x) = -x - h + x = -h$).
$$left|xright| = begincases x & textif x geq 0 \ -x & textif x lt 0 endcases$$ Although I knew what the absolute operator did, this really helped me understand why $|x+h| = -(x+h)$
– Cedric Martens
Jul 18 at 0:58
Glad to have helped!
– ConMan
Jul 18 at 3:20
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The absolute operator is defined as follows:
$$left|xright| = begincases
x & textif x geq 0 \
-x & textif x lt 0
endcases$$
In other words, if $x$ is positive (or zero), it stays the same. If $x$ is negative, then multiply it by $-1$ to make it positive.
When $h > 0$ and $x + h < 0$ (which happens when $|x| > h$, i.e. $x$ is "more negative" than $h$ is positive), you have $|x + h| = -(x + h) = -x - h$, and so $|x + h| - |x| = (-x - h) - (-x) = -x - h + x = -h$).
The absolute operator is defined as follows:
$$left|xright| = begincases
x & textif x geq 0 \
-x & textif x lt 0
endcases$$
In other words, if $x$ is positive (or zero), it stays the same. If $x$ is negative, then multiply it by $-1$ to make it positive.
When $h > 0$ and $x + h < 0$ (which happens when $|x| > h$, i.e. $x$ is "more negative" than $h$ is positive), you have $|x + h| = -(x + h) = -x - h$, and so $|x + h| - |x| = (-x - h) - (-x) = -x - h + x = -h$).
answered Jul 18 at 0:45
ConMan
6,9451324
6,9451324
$$left|xright| = begincases x & textif x geq 0 \ -x & textif x lt 0 endcases$$ Although I knew what the absolute operator did, this really helped me understand why $|x+h| = -(x+h)$
– Cedric Martens
Jul 18 at 0:58
Glad to have helped!
– ConMan
Jul 18 at 3:20
add a comment |Â
$$left|xright| = begincases x & textif x geq 0 \ -x & textif x lt 0 endcases$$ Although I knew what the absolute operator did, this really helped me understand why $|x+h| = -(x+h)$
– Cedric Martens
Jul 18 at 0:58
Glad to have helped!
– ConMan
Jul 18 at 3:20
$$left|xright| = begincases x & textif x geq 0 \ -x & textif x lt 0 endcases$$ Although I knew what the absolute operator did, this really helped me understand why $|x+h| = -(x+h)$
– Cedric Martens
Jul 18 at 0:58
$$left|xright| = begincases x & textif x geq 0 \ -x & textif x lt 0 endcases$$ Although I knew what the absolute operator did, this really helped me understand why $|x+h| = -(x+h)$
– Cedric Martens
Jul 18 at 0:58
Glad to have helped!
– ConMan
Jul 18 at 3:20
Glad to have helped!
– ConMan
Jul 18 at 3:20
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
If $x+h<0$ then all you can say is that $|x+h|=-x-h$.
Therefore what you are saying is that if $x+h<0$ then $-x-|x|=0$, or in other words $|x|=-x$.
Equivalently, you are saying that
if $x+h<0$ then $x<0$.
Can you see now why it is wrong?
It becomes true, however, if you add the requirement that $h>0$.
Yes I did omit that requirement of $h>0$, I will edit my question
– Cedric Martens
Jul 18 at 0:43
@CedricMartens If $h>0$, can you prove that $x+h<0implies x<0$?
– Arnaud Mortier
Jul 18 at 0:45
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
If $x+h<0$ then all you can say is that $|x+h|=-x-h$.
Therefore what you are saying is that if $x+h<0$ then $-x-|x|=0$, or in other words $|x|=-x$.
Equivalently, you are saying that
if $x+h<0$ then $x<0$.
Can you see now why it is wrong?
It becomes true, however, if you add the requirement that $h>0$.
Yes I did omit that requirement of $h>0$, I will edit my question
– Cedric Martens
Jul 18 at 0:43
@CedricMartens If $h>0$, can you prove that $x+h<0implies x<0$?
– Arnaud Mortier
Jul 18 at 0:45
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
If $x+h<0$ then all you can say is that $|x+h|=-x-h$.
Therefore what you are saying is that if $x+h<0$ then $-x-|x|=0$, or in other words $|x|=-x$.
Equivalently, you are saying that
if $x+h<0$ then $x<0$.
Can you see now why it is wrong?
It becomes true, however, if you add the requirement that $h>0$.
If $x+h<0$ then all you can say is that $|x+h|=-x-h$.
Therefore what you are saying is that if $x+h<0$ then $-x-|x|=0$, or in other words $|x|=-x$.
Equivalently, you are saying that
if $x+h<0$ then $x<0$.
Can you see now why it is wrong?
It becomes true, however, if you add the requirement that $h>0$.
edited Jul 18 at 0:43
answered Jul 18 at 0:40
Arnaud Mortier
19.1k22159
19.1k22159
Yes I did omit that requirement of $h>0$, I will edit my question
– Cedric Martens
Jul 18 at 0:43
@CedricMartens If $h>0$, can you prove that $x+h<0implies x<0$?
– Arnaud Mortier
Jul 18 at 0:45
add a comment |Â
Yes I did omit that requirement of $h>0$, I will edit my question
– Cedric Martens
Jul 18 at 0:43
@CedricMartens If $h>0$, can you prove that $x+h<0implies x<0$?
– Arnaud Mortier
Jul 18 at 0:45
Yes I did omit that requirement of $h>0$, I will edit my question
– Cedric Martens
Jul 18 at 0:43
Yes I did omit that requirement of $h>0$, I will edit my question
– Cedric Martens
Jul 18 at 0:43
@CedricMartens If $h>0$, can you prove that $x+h<0implies x<0$?
– Arnaud Mortier
Jul 18 at 0:45
@CedricMartens If $h>0$, can you prove that $x+h<0implies x<0$?
– Arnaud Mortier
Jul 18 at 0:45
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
This is a follow-on previous question. Please read about absolute value. When $x+h lt 0, |x+h|=-(x+h)$ directly from the definition. With the condition $h gt 0$ the fact that $x+h lt 0$ guarantees that $x lt 0$ and $|x|gt h$. In that case $$|x+h|-|x|=-(x+h)-(-x)=-x-h+x=-h$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
This is a follow-on previous question. Please read about absolute value. When $x+h lt 0, |x+h|=-(x+h)$ directly from the definition. With the condition $h gt 0$ the fact that $x+h lt 0$ guarantees that $x lt 0$ and $|x|gt h$. In that case $$|x+h|-|x|=-(x+h)-(-x)=-x-h+x=-h$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
This is a follow-on previous question. Please read about absolute value. When $x+h lt 0, |x+h|=-(x+h)$ directly from the definition. With the condition $h gt 0$ the fact that $x+h lt 0$ guarantees that $x lt 0$ and $|x|gt h$. In that case $$|x+h|-|x|=-(x+h)-(-x)=-x-h+x=-h$$
This is a follow-on previous question. Please read about absolute value. When $x+h lt 0, |x+h|=-(x+h)$ directly from the definition. With the condition $h gt 0$ the fact that $x+h lt 0$ guarantees that $x lt 0$ and $|x|gt h$. In that case $$|x+h|-|x|=-(x+h)-(-x)=-x-h+x=-h$$
answered Jul 18 at 0:47


Ross Millikan
276k21187352
276k21187352
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
We can get rid of some absolute since we know if it's positive/negative.
We have $-x-h-|x|=-h$ is what you're trying to prove which means
$x=-|x|.$ This simply means $x$ is not positive.
We have $|x-h|-|x|=-hiffx=-.$
This can be proved. Since $x+h<0$, $h>0,$ we have to have a positive plus a negative is less than $0,$ since a positive plus a nonnegative is still positive.
Therefore, we have proven that $x$ is negative, so $x=-|x|$ which proves $|x-h|-|x|=-h$ $boxedtextQ.E.D.$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
We can get rid of some absolute since we know if it's positive/negative.
We have $-x-h-|x|=-h$ is what you're trying to prove which means
$x=-|x|.$ This simply means $x$ is not positive.
We have $|x-h|-|x|=-hiffx=-.$
This can be proved. Since $x+h<0$, $h>0,$ we have to have a positive plus a negative is less than $0,$ since a positive plus a nonnegative is still positive.
Therefore, we have proven that $x$ is negative, so $x=-|x|$ which proves $|x-h|-|x|=-h$ $boxedtextQ.E.D.$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
We can get rid of some absolute since we know if it's positive/negative.
We have $-x-h-|x|=-h$ is what you're trying to prove which means
$x=-|x|.$ This simply means $x$ is not positive.
We have $|x-h|-|x|=-hiffx=-.$
This can be proved. Since $x+h<0$, $h>0,$ we have to have a positive plus a negative is less than $0,$ since a positive plus a nonnegative is still positive.
Therefore, we have proven that $x$ is negative, so $x=-|x|$ which proves $|x-h|-|x|=-h$ $boxedtextQ.E.D.$
We can get rid of some absolute since we know if it's positive/negative.
We have $-x-h-|x|=-h$ is what you're trying to prove which means
$x=-|x|.$ This simply means $x$ is not positive.
We have $|x-h|-|x|=-hiffx=-.$
This can be proved. Since $x+h<0$, $h>0,$ we have to have a positive plus a negative is less than $0,$ since a positive plus a nonnegative is still positive.
Therefore, we have proven that $x$ is negative, so $x=-|x|$ which proves $|x-h|-|x|=-h$ $boxedtextQ.E.D.$
answered Jul 18 at 0:52


Jason Kim
789
789
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2855058%2fif-xh0-and-h0-why-does-xh-x-h%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
3
It doesn't, necessarily. For example, $|1 - 2| - |1| neq -(-2)$.
– Theo Bendit
Jul 18 at 0:39
1
Hi Theo, I did a mistake that was pointed out by Arnaud. I edited my question. Thank you
– Cedric Martens
Jul 18 at 0:44