Is the composition of a Sobolev function and a smooth function Sobolev?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $Omega subseteq mathbbR^n$ be an open bounded domain, and let $1<p<n$. Suppose that $f in W^1,p(Omega)$ is continuous*, and $g in C^infty(mathbbR)$.



Is it true that $g circ f in W^1,p_loc(Omega)$?



My guess was that the answer is positive, and that $partial_i (g circ f)(x)=g'(f(x)) partial_i f(x)$ but a naive calculation to prove it failed.



*Note that the continuity of $f$ does not follow from $f in W^1,p(Omega)$, since $p<n$; this is an additional assumption I am adding.







share|cite|improve this question



















  • Isn't there some $|x|^θ$ that is in $W^1,p$, then using some $g(x) = |x|^phi$ should change the $p$
    – Calvin Khor
    Jul 30 at 9:27










  • the spike function only lives in local $W^1,p$ though
    – Calvin Khor
    Jul 30 at 9:33










  • the function i mentioned earlier, $|x|^-θ$ for $θ < (n-p)/p$
    – Calvin Khor
    Jul 30 at 9:36










  • You can use this result: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1110231/…
    – Bob
    Jul 30 at 11:11










  • @Bob Yes, but that assumes $g'$ is bounded and works also for $f$ that are not continuous.
    – Calvin Khor
    Jul 30 at 11:35














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $Omega subseteq mathbbR^n$ be an open bounded domain, and let $1<p<n$. Suppose that $f in W^1,p(Omega)$ is continuous*, and $g in C^infty(mathbbR)$.



Is it true that $g circ f in W^1,p_loc(Omega)$?



My guess was that the answer is positive, and that $partial_i (g circ f)(x)=g'(f(x)) partial_i f(x)$ but a naive calculation to prove it failed.



*Note that the continuity of $f$ does not follow from $f in W^1,p(Omega)$, since $p<n$; this is an additional assumption I am adding.







share|cite|improve this question



















  • Isn't there some $|x|^θ$ that is in $W^1,p$, then using some $g(x) = |x|^phi$ should change the $p$
    – Calvin Khor
    Jul 30 at 9:27










  • the spike function only lives in local $W^1,p$ though
    – Calvin Khor
    Jul 30 at 9:33










  • the function i mentioned earlier, $|x|^-θ$ for $θ < (n-p)/p$
    – Calvin Khor
    Jul 30 at 9:36










  • You can use this result: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1110231/…
    – Bob
    Jul 30 at 11:11










  • @Bob Yes, but that assumes $g'$ is bounded and works also for $f$ that are not continuous.
    – Calvin Khor
    Jul 30 at 11:35












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Let $Omega subseteq mathbbR^n$ be an open bounded domain, and let $1<p<n$. Suppose that $f in W^1,p(Omega)$ is continuous*, and $g in C^infty(mathbbR)$.



Is it true that $g circ f in W^1,p_loc(Omega)$?



My guess was that the answer is positive, and that $partial_i (g circ f)(x)=g'(f(x)) partial_i f(x)$ but a naive calculation to prove it failed.



*Note that the continuity of $f$ does not follow from $f in W^1,p(Omega)$, since $p<n$; this is an additional assumption I am adding.







share|cite|improve this question











Let $Omega subseteq mathbbR^n$ be an open bounded domain, and let $1<p<n$. Suppose that $f in W^1,p(Omega)$ is continuous*, and $g in C^infty(mathbbR)$.



Is it true that $g circ f in W^1,p_loc(Omega)$?



My guess was that the answer is positive, and that $partial_i (g circ f)(x)=g'(f(x)) partial_i f(x)$ but a naive calculation to prove it failed.



*Note that the continuity of $f$ does not follow from $f in W^1,p(Omega)$, since $p<n$; this is an additional assumption I am adding.









share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked Jul 30 at 9:06









Asaf Shachar

4,4823832




4,4823832











  • Isn't there some $|x|^θ$ that is in $W^1,p$, then using some $g(x) = |x|^phi$ should change the $p$
    – Calvin Khor
    Jul 30 at 9:27










  • the spike function only lives in local $W^1,p$ though
    – Calvin Khor
    Jul 30 at 9:33










  • the function i mentioned earlier, $|x|^-θ$ for $θ < (n-p)/p$
    – Calvin Khor
    Jul 30 at 9:36










  • You can use this result: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1110231/…
    – Bob
    Jul 30 at 11:11










  • @Bob Yes, but that assumes $g'$ is bounded and works also for $f$ that are not continuous.
    – Calvin Khor
    Jul 30 at 11:35
















  • Isn't there some $|x|^θ$ that is in $W^1,p$, then using some $g(x) = |x|^phi$ should change the $p$
    – Calvin Khor
    Jul 30 at 9:27










  • the spike function only lives in local $W^1,p$ though
    – Calvin Khor
    Jul 30 at 9:33










  • the function i mentioned earlier, $|x|^-θ$ for $θ < (n-p)/p$
    – Calvin Khor
    Jul 30 at 9:36










  • You can use this result: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1110231/…
    – Bob
    Jul 30 at 11:11










  • @Bob Yes, but that assumes $g'$ is bounded and works also for $f$ that are not continuous.
    – Calvin Khor
    Jul 30 at 11:35















Isn't there some $|x|^θ$ that is in $W^1,p$, then using some $g(x) = |x|^phi$ should change the $p$
– Calvin Khor
Jul 30 at 9:27




Isn't there some $|x|^θ$ that is in $W^1,p$, then using some $g(x) = |x|^phi$ should change the $p$
– Calvin Khor
Jul 30 at 9:27












the spike function only lives in local $W^1,p$ though
– Calvin Khor
Jul 30 at 9:33




the spike function only lives in local $W^1,p$ though
– Calvin Khor
Jul 30 at 9:33












the function i mentioned earlier, $|x|^-θ$ for $θ < (n-p)/p$
– Calvin Khor
Jul 30 at 9:36




the function i mentioned earlier, $|x|^-θ$ for $θ < (n-p)/p$
– Calvin Khor
Jul 30 at 9:36












You can use this result: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1110231/…
– Bob
Jul 30 at 11:11




You can use this result: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1110231/…
– Bob
Jul 30 at 11:11












@Bob Yes, but that assumes $g'$ is bounded and works also for $f$ that are not continuous.
– Calvin Khor
Jul 30 at 11:35




@Bob Yes, but that assumes $g'$ is bounded and works also for $f$ that are not continuous.
– Calvin Khor
Jul 30 at 11:35










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










The answer is positive. Indeed, we have the following version of the chain rule in Sobolev spaces:




Assume $F : mathbbR to mathbbR$ is $C^1$, with $F'$ bounded. Suppose $U$ is bounded and $u in W^1,p(U)$ for some $1 le p < infty$. Then $$v :=F circ u in W^1,p(U) quad textand the weak derivatives satisfy quad v_x_i=F'(u)u_x_i.$$




As stated this theorem does not help us. However, inspecting its proof we see that it only uses the following fact:



There exist approximating functions $u_k in C^infty$ (i.e. $u_k to u$ in $W^1,p$) such that $F'$ is bounded in a ball containing $textImage(u_k),textImage(u)$ for all sufficiently large $k$.



In our case, $u$ is continuous hence bounded on compact subsets. Hence, there are approximations $u_k$ which are also uniformly bounded for sufficiently large $k$. (Think of the standard density proof, via convolution with mollifiers). Recall we are only looking for a local result.



From here essentially the same proof should work.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2866812%2fis-the-composition-of-a-sobolev-function-and-a-smooth-function-sobolev%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted










    The answer is positive. Indeed, we have the following version of the chain rule in Sobolev spaces:




    Assume $F : mathbbR to mathbbR$ is $C^1$, with $F'$ bounded. Suppose $U$ is bounded and $u in W^1,p(U)$ for some $1 le p < infty$. Then $$v :=F circ u in W^1,p(U) quad textand the weak derivatives satisfy quad v_x_i=F'(u)u_x_i.$$




    As stated this theorem does not help us. However, inspecting its proof we see that it only uses the following fact:



    There exist approximating functions $u_k in C^infty$ (i.e. $u_k to u$ in $W^1,p$) such that $F'$ is bounded in a ball containing $textImage(u_k),textImage(u)$ for all sufficiently large $k$.



    In our case, $u$ is continuous hence bounded on compact subsets. Hence, there are approximations $u_k$ which are also uniformly bounded for sufficiently large $k$. (Think of the standard density proof, via convolution with mollifiers). Recall we are only looking for a local result.



    From here essentially the same proof should work.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote



      accepted










      The answer is positive. Indeed, we have the following version of the chain rule in Sobolev spaces:




      Assume $F : mathbbR to mathbbR$ is $C^1$, with $F'$ bounded. Suppose $U$ is bounded and $u in W^1,p(U)$ for some $1 le p < infty$. Then $$v :=F circ u in W^1,p(U) quad textand the weak derivatives satisfy quad v_x_i=F'(u)u_x_i.$$




      As stated this theorem does not help us. However, inspecting its proof we see that it only uses the following fact:



      There exist approximating functions $u_k in C^infty$ (i.e. $u_k to u$ in $W^1,p$) such that $F'$ is bounded in a ball containing $textImage(u_k),textImage(u)$ for all sufficiently large $k$.



      In our case, $u$ is continuous hence bounded on compact subsets. Hence, there are approximations $u_k$ which are also uniformly bounded for sufficiently large $k$. (Think of the standard density proof, via convolution with mollifiers). Recall we are only looking for a local result.



      From here essentially the same proof should work.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted






        The answer is positive. Indeed, we have the following version of the chain rule in Sobolev spaces:




        Assume $F : mathbbR to mathbbR$ is $C^1$, with $F'$ bounded. Suppose $U$ is bounded and $u in W^1,p(U)$ for some $1 le p < infty$. Then $$v :=F circ u in W^1,p(U) quad textand the weak derivatives satisfy quad v_x_i=F'(u)u_x_i.$$




        As stated this theorem does not help us. However, inspecting its proof we see that it only uses the following fact:



        There exist approximating functions $u_k in C^infty$ (i.e. $u_k to u$ in $W^1,p$) such that $F'$ is bounded in a ball containing $textImage(u_k),textImage(u)$ for all sufficiently large $k$.



        In our case, $u$ is continuous hence bounded on compact subsets. Hence, there are approximations $u_k$ which are also uniformly bounded for sufficiently large $k$. (Think of the standard density proof, via convolution with mollifiers). Recall we are only looking for a local result.



        From here essentially the same proof should work.






        share|cite|improve this answer













        The answer is positive. Indeed, we have the following version of the chain rule in Sobolev spaces:




        Assume $F : mathbbR to mathbbR$ is $C^1$, with $F'$ bounded. Suppose $U$ is bounded and $u in W^1,p(U)$ for some $1 le p < infty$. Then $$v :=F circ u in W^1,p(U) quad textand the weak derivatives satisfy quad v_x_i=F'(u)u_x_i.$$




        As stated this theorem does not help us. However, inspecting its proof we see that it only uses the following fact:



        There exist approximating functions $u_k in C^infty$ (i.e. $u_k to u$ in $W^1,p$) such that $F'$ is bounded in a ball containing $textImage(u_k),textImage(u)$ for all sufficiently large $k$.



        In our case, $u$ is continuous hence bounded on compact subsets. Hence, there are approximations $u_k$ which are also uniformly bounded for sufficiently large $k$. (Think of the standard density proof, via convolution with mollifiers). Recall we are only looking for a local result.



        From here essentially the same proof should work.







        share|cite|improve this answer













        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer











        answered Aug 5 at 14:05









        Asaf Shachar

        4,4823832




        4,4823832






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2866812%2fis-the-composition-of-a-sobolev-function-and-a-smooth-function-sobolev%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?