Listing some properties of a Borel Measure
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
Finally I decided to sign up to the forum which I've always found really helpful! I'm James and I'm a Math student (Master degree). Today I came across this exercise that I can't solve and I was wondering if any of you had some ideas about it. Basically I have:
$ mathbbQ = q_n_n in mathbbN$ where ($q_n ne q_m$ if $n ne m$) and let
$$ mu = sum_n in mathbbN frac1n^2 delta_q_n$$
Where $delta_x$ is Dirac delta centered in $x in mathbbR$.
Let $f : mathbbR rightarrow mathbbR$ such that
if $x gt 0$
$$f(x) = mu ((0,x)) $$
if $x le 0$
$$f(x) = mu ((x,0])$$
Summarize some $f$ properties (in particular, sign, continuity, right/left continuity, total variation, boundedness, monotony, values of $f(0^+)$, $f(0^-)$..) and some $mu$ properties (in particular (absolute continuity, discrete, singular.. respect to the Lebesgue measure). Thank you in advance!
real-analysis measure-theory dirac-delta
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
Finally I decided to sign up to the forum which I've always found really helpful! I'm James and I'm a Math student (Master degree). Today I came across this exercise that I can't solve and I was wondering if any of you had some ideas about it. Basically I have:
$ mathbbQ = q_n_n in mathbbN$ where ($q_n ne q_m$ if $n ne m$) and let
$$ mu = sum_n in mathbbN frac1n^2 delta_q_n$$
Where $delta_x$ is Dirac delta centered in $x in mathbbR$.
Let $f : mathbbR rightarrow mathbbR$ such that
if $x gt 0$
$$f(x) = mu ((0,x)) $$
if $x le 0$
$$f(x) = mu ((x,0])$$
Summarize some $f$ properties (in particular, sign, continuity, right/left continuity, total variation, boundedness, monotony, values of $f(0^+)$, $f(0^-)$..) and some $mu$ properties (in particular (absolute continuity, discrete, singular.. respect to the Lebesgue measure). Thank you in advance!
real-analysis measure-theory dirac-delta
I don't understand your notation. For me $(0,x)$ is a point in $Bbb R^2$ and $mu ((0,x))$ to me is meaningless.
– DanielWainfleet
Jul 30 at 15:35
1
We're in $mathbbR$ so it's supposed to be the Measure of the interval $(0,x)$ for $x gt 0$. Is that right?
– James Arten
Jul 30 at 15:38
1
You'll find that simple "Here's the statement of my exercise, solve it for me" posts will be poorly received. What is better is for you to add context (with an edit): What you understand about the problem, what you've tried so far, etc.; something both to show you are part of the learning experience and to help us guide you to the appropriate help. You can consult this link for further guidance.
– Shaun
Jul 30 at 15:46
I didn't ask anyone to 'solve it' but just some general ideas that could help me solving this. By your message I guess you didn't read the original post carefully. Regards
– James Arten
Jul 30 at 17:00
@JamesArten. D'Oh. Of course.............
– DanielWainfleet
Jul 30 at 17:33
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
Finally I decided to sign up to the forum which I've always found really helpful! I'm James and I'm a Math student (Master degree). Today I came across this exercise that I can't solve and I was wondering if any of you had some ideas about it. Basically I have:
$ mathbbQ = q_n_n in mathbbN$ where ($q_n ne q_m$ if $n ne m$) and let
$$ mu = sum_n in mathbbN frac1n^2 delta_q_n$$
Where $delta_x$ is Dirac delta centered in $x in mathbbR$.
Let $f : mathbbR rightarrow mathbbR$ such that
if $x gt 0$
$$f(x) = mu ((0,x)) $$
if $x le 0$
$$f(x) = mu ((x,0])$$
Summarize some $f$ properties (in particular, sign, continuity, right/left continuity, total variation, boundedness, monotony, values of $f(0^+)$, $f(0^-)$..) and some $mu$ properties (in particular (absolute continuity, discrete, singular.. respect to the Lebesgue measure). Thank you in advance!
real-analysis measure-theory dirac-delta
Finally I decided to sign up to the forum which I've always found really helpful! I'm James and I'm a Math student (Master degree). Today I came across this exercise that I can't solve and I was wondering if any of you had some ideas about it. Basically I have:
$ mathbbQ = q_n_n in mathbbN$ where ($q_n ne q_m$ if $n ne m$) and let
$$ mu = sum_n in mathbbN frac1n^2 delta_q_n$$
Where $delta_x$ is Dirac delta centered in $x in mathbbR$.
Let $f : mathbbR rightarrow mathbbR$ such that
if $x gt 0$
$$f(x) = mu ((0,x)) $$
if $x le 0$
$$f(x) = mu ((x,0])$$
Summarize some $f$ properties (in particular, sign, continuity, right/left continuity, total variation, boundedness, monotony, values of $f(0^+)$, $f(0^-)$..) and some $mu$ properties (in particular (absolute continuity, discrete, singular.. respect to the Lebesgue measure). Thank you in advance!
real-analysis measure-theory dirac-delta
edited Jul 30 at 15:06
asked Jul 30 at 14:53
James Arten
186
186
I don't understand your notation. For me $(0,x)$ is a point in $Bbb R^2$ and $mu ((0,x))$ to me is meaningless.
– DanielWainfleet
Jul 30 at 15:35
1
We're in $mathbbR$ so it's supposed to be the Measure of the interval $(0,x)$ for $x gt 0$. Is that right?
– James Arten
Jul 30 at 15:38
1
You'll find that simple "Here's the statement of my exercise, solve it for me" posts will be poorly received. What is better is for you to add context (with an edit): What you understand about the problem, what you've tried so far, etc.; something both to show you are part of the learning experience and to help us guide you to the appropriate help. You can consult this link for further guidance.
– Shaun
Jul 30 at 15:46
I didn't ask anyone to 'solve it' but just some general ideas that could help me solving this. By your message I guess you didn't read the original post carefully. Regards
– James Arten
Jul 30 at 17:00
@JamesArten. D'Oh. Of course.............
– DanielWainfleet
Jul 30 at 17:33
 |Â
show 1 more comment
I don't understand your notation. For me $(0,x)$ is a point in $Bbb R^2$ and $mu ((0,x))$ to me is meaningless.
– DanielWainfleet
Jul 30 at 15:35
1
We're in $mathbbR$ so it's supposed to be the Measure of the interval $(0,x)$ for $x gt 0$. Is that right?
– James Arten
Jul 30 at 15:38
1
You'll find that simple "Here's the statement of my exercise, solve it for me" posts will be poorly received. What is better is for you to add context (with an edit): What you understand about the problem, what you've tried so far, etc.; something both to show you are part of the learning experience and to help us guide you to the appropriate help. You can consult this link for further guidance.
– Shaun
Jul 30 at 15:46
I didn't ask anyone to 'solve it' but just some general ideas that could help me solving this. By your message I guess you didn't read the original post carefully. Regards
– James Arten
Jul 30 at 17:00
@JamesArten. D'Oh. Of course.............
– DanielWainfleet
Jul 30 at 17:33
I don't understand your notation. For me $(0,x)$ is a point in $Bbb R^2$ and $mu ((0,x))$ to me is meaningless.
– DanielWainfleet
Jul 30 at 15:35
I don't understand your notation. For me $(0,x)$ is a point in $Bbb R^2$ and $mu ((0,x))$ to me is meaningless.
– DanielWainfleet
Jul 30 at 15:35
1
1
We're in $mathbbR$ so it's supposed to be the Measure of the interval $(0,x)$ for $x gt 0$. Is that right?
– James Arten
Jul 30 at 15:38
We're in $mathbbR$ so it's supposed to be the Measure of the interval $(0,x)$ for $x gt 0$. Is that right?
– James Arten
Jul 30 at 15:38
1
1
You'll find that simple "Here's the statement of my exercise, solve it for me" posts will be poorly received. What is better is for you to add context (with an edit): What you understand about the problem, what you've tried so far, etc.; something both to show you are part of the learning experience and to help us guide you to the appropriate help. You can consult this link for further guidance.
– Shaun
Jul 30 at 15:46
You'll find that simple "Here's the statement of my exercise, solve it for me" posts will be poorly received. What is better is for you to add context (with an edit): What you understand about the problem, what you've tried so far, etc.; something both to show you are part of the learning experience and to help us guide you to the appropriate help. You can consult this link for further guidance.
– Shaun
Jul 30 at 15:46
I didn't ask anyone to 'solve it' but just some general ideas that could help me solving this. By your message I guess you didn't read the original post carefully. Regards
– James Arten
Jul 30 at 17:00
I didn't ask anyone to 'solve it' but just some general ideas that could help me solving this. By your message I guess you didn't read the original post carefully. Regards
– James Arten
Jul 30 at 17:00
@JamesArten. D'Oh. Of course.............
– DanielWainfleet
Jul 30 at 17:33
@JamesArten. D'Oh. Of course.............
– DanielWainfleet
Jul 30 at 17:33
 |Â
show 1 more comment
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2867103%2flisting-some-properties-of-a-borel-measure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
I don't understand your notation. For me $(0,x)$ is a point in $Bbb R^2$ and $mu ((0,x))$ to me is meaningless.
– DanielWainfleet
Jul 30 at 15:35
1
We're in $mathbbR$ so it's supposed to be the Measure of the interval $(0,x)$ for $x gt 0$. Is that right?
– James Arten
Jul 30 at 15:38
1
You'll find that simple "Here's the statement of my exercise, solve it for me" posts will be poorly received. What is better is for you to add context (with an edit): What you understand about the problem, what you've tried so far, etc.; something both to show you are part of the learning experience and to help us guide you to the appropriate help. You can consult this link for further guidance.
– Shaun
Jul 30 at 15:46
I didn't ask anyone to 'solve it' but just some general ideas that could help me solving this. By your message I guess you didn't read the original post carefully. Regards
– James Arten
Jul 30 at 17:00
@JamesArten. D'Oh. Of course.............
– DanielWainfleet
Jul 30 at 17:33