Normal distribution in an interval [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












I am interested in the cumulative function of the normal distribution, because I want to get the distribution which has the support $[0,2pi]$, and it looks like a normal distribution. Therefore, if I get the closed form of $F(2pi)$ and $F(0)$, I can get the new distribution which has the pdf:
$$frac1F(2pi) -F(0)frac1sqrt2pisigma^2exp(-frac(x-mu)^22sigma^2),~xin[0,2pi]$$



For example, can we calculate the following integral:
$$int_0^2pifrac1sqrt2pisigma^2exp(-frac(x-mu)^22sigma^2)$$



Is there exists any method which can be used to get the closed form of it. Or can we get any similar distribution?







share|cite|improve this question













closed as off-topic by amWhy, callculus, Xander Henderson, max_zorn, Gibbs Jul 18 at 9:05


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – amWhy, callculus, Xander Henderson, max_zorn, Gibbs
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • Where did you get stuck? Please show us what work you've done. Or provide us with information about the class or course or text you are studying for/from, and some some definitions you've been taught, like "normal distribution", and then "cumulative normal distribution." If you don't know those definitions and so can't address those definitions in your post, search for them in your notes and/or in your text, and/or on-line. Please improve your post (edit it) by including your efforts and/or the definitions you're working with.
    – amWhy
    Jul 17 at 20:02






  • 2




    There exists no closed form. But you can calculate it numerically in a few step since $2pi$ is not far away from $0$
    – callculus
    Jul 17 at 20:10







  • 1




    It doesn´t help to edit you question several times without new information. You have to give a reply to the ansawer or the comments. Are you interested in a numerical method or not?
    – callculus
    Jul 17 at 20:24











  • Yes. I think the only way to get the answer is by some numerical methods. My goal is to find a distribution which looks like the normal distribution but has the support on a interval.
    – coolcat
    Jul 17 at 20:49










  • @coolcat You can look here for a nice and easy approximation (similar distribution). I think this is what you are looking for.
    – callculus
    Jul 17 at 21:02















up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












I am interested in the cumulative function of the normal distribution, because I want to get the distribution which has the support $[0,2pi]$, and it looks like a normal distribution. Therefore, if I get the closed form of $F(2pi)$ and $F(0)$, I can get the new distribution which has the pdf:
$$frac1F(2pi) -F(0)frac1sqrt2pisigma^2exp(-frac(x-mu)^22sigma^2),~xin[0,2pi]$$



For example, can we calculate the following integral:
$$int_0^2pifrac1sqrt2pisigma^2exp(-frac(x-mu)^22sigma^2)$$



Is there exists any method which can be used to get the closed form of it. Or can we get any similar distribution?







share|cite|improve this question













closed as off-topic by amWhy, callculus, Xander Henderson, max_zorn, Gibbs Jul 18 at 9:05


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – amWhy, callculus, Xander Henderson, max_zorn, Gibbs
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • Where did you get stuck? Please show us what work you've done. Or provide us with information about the class or course or text you are studying for/from, and some some definitions you've been taught, like "normal distribution", and then "cumulative normal distribution." If you don't know those definitions and so can't address those definitions in your post, search for them in your notes and/or in your text, and/or on-line. Please improve your post (edit it) by including your efforts and/or the definitions you're working with.
    – amWhy
    Jul 17 at 20:02






  • 2




    There exists no closed form. But you can calculate it numerically in a few step since $2pi$ is not far away from $0$
    – callculus
    Jul 17 at 20:10







  • 1




    It doesn´t help to edit you question several times without new information. You have to give a reply to the ansawer or the comments. Are you interested in a numerical method or not?
    – callculus
    Jul 17 at 20:24











  • Yes. I think the only way to get the answer is by some numerical methods. My goal is to find a distribution which looks like the normal distribution but has the support on a interval.
    – coolcat
    Jul 17 at 20:49










  • @coolcat You can look here for a nice and easy approximation (similar distribution). I think this is what you are looking for.
    – callculus
    Jul 17 at 21:02













up vote
-1
down vote

favorite









up vote
-1
down vote

favorite











I am interested in the cumulative function of the normal distribution, because I want to get the distribution which has the support $[0,2pi]$, and it looks like a normal distribution. Therefore, if I get the closed form of $F(2pi)$ and $F(0)$, I can get the new distribution which has the pdf:
$$frac1F(2pi) -F(0)frac1sqrt2pisigma^2exp(-frac(x-mu)^22sigma^2),~xin[0,2pi]$$



For example, can we calculate the following integral:
$$int_0^2pifrac1sqrt2pisigma^2exp(-frac(x-mu)^22sigma^2)$$



Is there exists any method which can be used to get the closed form of it. Or can we get any similar distribution?







share|cite|improve this question













I am interested in the cumulative function of the normal distribution, because I want to get the distribution which has the support $[0,2pi]$, and it looks like a normal distribution. Therefore, if I get the closed form of $F(2pi)$ and $F(0)$, I can get the new distribution which has the pdf:
$$frac1F(2pi) -F(0)frac1sqrt2pisigma^2exp(-frac(x-mu)^22sigma^2),~xin[0,2pi]$$



For example, can we calculate the following integral:
$$int_0^2pifrac1sqrt2pisigma^2exp(-frac(x-mu)^22sigma^2)$$



Is there exists any method which can be used to get the closed form of it. Or can we get any similar distribution?









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 17 at 20:21
























asked Jul 17 at 19:54









coolcat

1018




1018




closed as off-topic by amWhy, callculus, Xander Henderson, max_zorn, Gibbs Jul 18 at 9:05


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – amWhy, callculus, Xander Henderson, max_zorn, Gibbs
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by amWhy, callculus, Xander Henderson, max_zorn, Gibbs Jul 18 at 9:05


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – amWhy, callculus, Xander Henderson, max_zorn, Gibbs
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • Where did you get stuck? Please show us what work you've done. Or provide us with information about the class or course or text you are studying for/from, and some some definitions you've been taught, like "normal distribution", and then "cumulative normal distribution." If you don't know those definitions and so can't address those definitions in your post, search for them in your notes and/or in your text, and/or on-line. Please improve your post (edit it) by including your efforts and/or the definitions you're working with.
    – amWhy
    Jul 17 at 20:02






  • 2




    There exists no closed form. But you can calculate it numerically in a few step since $2pi$ is not far away from $0$
    – callculus
    Jul 17 at 20:10







  • 1




    It doesn´t help to edit you question several times without new information. You have to give a reply to the ansawer or the comments. Are you interested in a numerical method or not?
    – callculus
    Jul 17 at 20:24











  • Yes. I think the only way to get the answer is by some numerical methods. My goal is to find a distribution which looks like the normal distribution but has the support on a interval.
    – coolcat
    Jul 17 at 20:49










  • @coolcat You can look here for a nice and easy approximation (similar distribution). I think this is what you are looking for.
    – callculus
    Jul 17 at 21:02

















  • Where did you get stuck? Please show us what work you've done. Or provide us with information about the class or course or text you are studying for/from, and some some definitions you've been taught, like "normal distribution", and then "cumulative normal distribution." If you don't know those definitions and so can't address those definitions in your post, search for them in your notes and/or in your text, and/or on-line. Please improve your post (edit it) by including your efforts and/or the definitions you're working with.
    – amWhy
    Jul 17 at 20:02






  • 2




    There exists no closed form. But you can calculate it numerically in a few step since $2pi$ is not far away from $0$
    – callculus
    Jul 17 at 20:10







  • 1




    It doesn´t help to edit you question several times without new information. You have to give a reply to the ansawer or the comments. Are you interested in a numerical method or not?
    – callculus
    Jul 17 at 20:24











  • Yes. I think the only way to get the answer is by some numerical methods. My goal is to find a distribution which looks like the normal distribution but has the support on a interval.
    – coolcat
    Jul 17 at 20:49










  • @coolcat You can look here for a nice and easy approximation (similar distribution). I think this is what you are looking for.
    – callculus
    Jul 17 at 21:02
















Where did you get stuck? Please show us what work you've done. Or provide us with information about the class or course or text you are studying for/from, and some some definitions you've been taught, like "normal distribution", and then "cumulative normal distribution." If you don't know those definitions and so can't address those definitions in your post, search for them in your notes and/or in your text, and/or on-line. Please improve your post (edit it) by including your efforts and/or the definitions you're working with.
– amWhy
Jul 17 at 20:02




Where did you get stuck? Please show us what work you've done. Or provide us with information about the class or course or text you are studying for/from, and some some definitions you've been taught, like "normal distribution", and then "cumulative normal distribution." If you don't know those definitions and so can't address those definitions in your post, search for them in your notes and/or in your text, and/or on-line. Please improve your post (edit it) by including your efforts and/or the definitions you're working with.
– amWhy
Jul 17 at 20:02




2




2




There exists no closed form. But you can calculate it numerically in a few step since $2pi$ is not far away from $0$
– callculus
Jul 17 at 20:10





There exists no closed form. But you can calculate it numerically in a few step since $2pi$ is not far away from $0$
– callculus
Jul 17 at 20:10





1




1




It doesn´t help to edit you question several times without new information. You have to give a reply to the ansawer or the comments. Are you interested in a numerical method or not?
– callculus
Jul 17 at 20:24





It doesn´t help to edit you question several times without new information. You have to give a reply to the ansawer or the comments. Are you interested in a numerical method or not?
– callculus
Jul 17 at 20:24













Yes. I think the only way to get the answer is by some numerical methods. My goal is to find a distribution which looks like the normal distribution but has the support on a interval.
– coolcat
Jul 17 at 20:49




Yes. I think the only way to get the answer is by some numerical methods. My goal is to find a distribution which looks like the normal distribution but has the support on a interval.
– coolcat
Jul 17 at 20:49












@coolcat You can look here for a nice and easy approximation (similar distribution). I think this is what you are looking for.
– callculus
Jul 17 at 21:02





@coolcat You can look here for a nice and easy approximation (similar distribution). I think this is what you are looking for.
– callculus
Jul 17 at 21:02











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










There is no closed-form version of it, because the Gaussian does not have an elementary antiderivative. You use tables, or you compute it numerically.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    In fact the mostly used CDF in this case is $1-Q(dfracx-musigma)$ where $Q(.)$ denotes the $Q$ function and has no close form. You can also refer to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q-function






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted










      There is no closed-form version of it, because the Gaussian does not have an elementary antiderivative. You use tables, or you compute it numerically.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted










        There is no closed-form version of it, because the Gaussian does not have an elementary antiderivative. You use tables, or you compute it numerically.






        share|cite|improve this answer























          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          There is no closed-form version of it, because the Gaussian does not have an elementary antiderivative. You use tables, or you compute it numerically.






          share|cite|improve this answer













          There is no closed-form version of it, because the Gaussian does not have an elementary antiderivative. You use tables, or you compute it numerically.







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer











          answered Jul 17 at 19:58









          Adrian Keister

          3,61721533




          3,61721533




















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              In fact the mostly used CDF in this case is $1-Q(dfracx-musigma)$ where $Q(.)$ denotes the $Q$ function and has no close form. You can also refer to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q-function






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                In fact the mostly used CDF in this case is $1-Q(dfracx-musigma)$ where $Q(.)$ denotes the $Q$ function and has no close form. You can also refer to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q-function






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  In fact the mostly used CDF in this case is $1-Q(dfracx-musigma)$ where $Q(.)$ denotes the $Q$ function and has no close form. You can also refer to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q-function






                  share|cite|improve this answer













                  In fact the mostly used CDF in this case is $1-Q(dfracx-musigma)$ where $Q(.)$ denotes the $Q$ function and has no close form. You can also refer to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q-function







                  share|cite|improve this answer













                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  answered Jul 17 at 21:10









                  Mostafa Ayaz

                  8,6023630




                  8,6023630












                      Comments

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                      Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                      Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?