Reversal of Brownian motion from first hitting time

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Let $(B_t)_t ge 0$ be a (standard) Brownian motion, and for fixed $C>0$ define the first hitting time
$$T_C := inf t ge 0: B_t = C.$$



I am interested in the reversal of the Brownian motion from the first hitting time $T_C$, i.e. a description of the distribution of the path
$$(B_T_C - s - C)_s le T_C.$$



My question is whether this has the same law as
$$(widetildeB_s)_s le S_-C$$
where $(widetildeB_s)_s ge 0$ is a Brownian motion conditioned to stay non-positive, and $S_-C$ is the last time that the process $(B_s)$ hits $-C$.



My guess above comes from the analogous problem for Brownian motion with negative drift. I was told that the following is true (I would appreciate a reference for that):




Fix $m > 0$ and $C > 0$ as before. Let $T_C$ (resp. $S_-C$) be the first hitting time of $C$ (resp. last hittimg time of $-C$) of the Brownian motion with negative drift $(B_s -ms)_s ge 0$. Then
$$(B_T_C - s + m(T_C - s) - C)_s le T_C oversetd= (widetildeB_s - ms)_s le S_-C$$
where $(widetildeB_s - ms)_s ge 0$ is a Brownian motion with drift $-m$ conditioned to stay non-positive.




As a heuristic I can send $m to 0$ and that would recover my claim above, but this does not constitute a mathematical proof. It would be great if someone could tell me that my claim is correct and point me to references where a proof can be easily found.







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $(B_t)_t ge 0$ be a (standard) Brownian motion, and for fixed $C>0$ define the first hitting time
    $$T_C := inf t ge 0: B_t = C.$$



    I am interested in the reversal of the Brownian motion from the first hitting time $T_C$, i.e. a description of the distribution of the path
    $$(B_T_C - s - C)_s le T_C.$$



    My question is whether this has the same law as
    $$(widetildeB_s)_s le S_-C$$
    where $(widetildeB_s)_s ge 0$ is a Brownian motion conditioned to stay non-positive, and $S_-C$ is the last time that the process $(B_s)$ hits $-C$.



    My guess above comes from the analogous problem for Brownian motion with negative drift. I was told that the following is true (I would appreciate a reference for that):




    Fix $m > 0$ and $C > 0$ as before. Let $T_C$ (resp. $S_-C$) be the first hitting time of $C$ (resp. last hittimg time of $-C$) of the Brownian motion with negative drift $(B_s -ms)_s ge 0$. Then
    $$(B_T_C - s + m(T_C - s) - C)_s le T_C oversetd= (widetildeB_s - ms)_s le S_-C$$
    where $(widetildeB_s - ms)_s ge 0$ is a Brownian motion with drift $-m$ conditioned to stay non-positive.




    As a heuristic I can send $m to 0$ and that would recover my claim above, but this does not constitute a mathematical proof. It would be great if someone could tell me that my claim is correct and point me to references where a proof can be easily found.







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $(B_t)_t ge 0$ be a (standard) Brownian motion, and for fixed $C>0$ define the first hitting time
      $$T_C := inf t ge 0: B_t = C.$$



      I am interested in the reversal of the Brownian motion from the first hitting time $T_C$, i.e. a description of the distribution of the path
      $$(B_T_C - s - C)_s le T_C.$$



      My question is whether this has the same law as
      $$(widetildeB_s)_s le S_-C$$
      where $(widetildeB_s)_s ge 0$ is a Brownian motion conditioned to stay non-positive, and $S_-C$ is the last time that the process $(B_s)$ hits $-C$.



      My guess above comes from the analogous problem for Brownian motion with negative drift. I was told that the following is true (I would appreciate a reference for that):




      Fix $m > 0$ and $C > 0$ as before. Let $T_C$ (resp. $S_-C$) be the first hitting time of $C$ (resp. last hittimg time of $-C$) of the Brownian motion with negative drift $(B_s -ms)_s ge 0$. Then
      $$(B_T_C - s + m(T_C - s) - C)_s le T_C oversetd= (widetildeB_s - ms)_s le S_-C$$
      where $(widetildeB_s - ms)_s ge 0$ is a Brownian motion with drift $-m$ conditioned to stay non-positive.




      As a heuristic I can send $m to 0$ and that would recover my claim above, but this does not constitute a mathematical proof. It would be great if someone could tell me that my claim is correct and point me to references where a proof can be easily found.







      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $(B_t)_t ge 0$ be a (standard) Brownian motion, and for fixed $C>0$ define the first hitting time
      $$T_C := inf t ge 0: B_t = C.$$



      I am interested in the reversal of the Brownian motion from the first hitting time $T_C$, i.e. a description of the distribution of the path
      $$(B_T_C - s - C)_s le T_C.$$



      My question is whether this has the same law as
      $$(widetildeB_s)_s le S_-C$$
      where $(widetildeB_s)_s ge 0$ is a Brownian motion conditioned to stay non-positive, and $S_-C$ is the last time that the process $(B_s)$ hits $-C$.



      My guess above comes from the analogous problem for Brownian motion with negative drift. I was told that the following is true (I would appreciate a reference for that):




      Fix $m > 0$ and $C > 0$ as before. Let $T_C$ (resp. $S_-C$) be the first hitting time of $C$ (resp. last hittimg time of $-C$) of the Brownian motion with negative drift $(B_s -ms)_s ge 0$. Then
      $$(B_T_C - s + m(T_C - s) - C)_s le T_C oversetd= (widetildeB_s - ms)_s le S_-C$$
      where $(widetildeB_s - ms)_s ge 0$ is a Brownian motion with drift $-m$ conditioned to stay non-positive.




      As a heuristic I can send $m to 0$ and that would recover my claim above, but this does not constitute a mathematical proof. It would be great if someone could tell me that my claim is correct and point me to references where a proof can be easily found.









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jul 24 at 14:01
























      asked Jul 24 at 11:28









      random_person

      1286




      1286

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2861238%2freversal-of-brownian-motion-from-first-hitting-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2861238%2freversal-of-brownian-motion-from-first-hitting-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?