Stokes theorem, intersection between cylinder and plane
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
$mathcal C$ is the intersection curve between the cylinder $x^2 + y^2 = 2y$ and the plane $y = z$. I tried parameterizing the curve by expanding the cylinder equation $x^2 + (y-1)^2 = 1$. I think I can write the parameterization as follows: $(r cos(theta), r sin(theta) + 1, 0)$? How do I proceed from here, I want to use Stokes theorem. $mathcal C$ is oriented counterclockwise.
vector-analysis stokes-theorem
add a comment |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
$mathcal C$ is the intersection curve between the cylinder $x^2 + y^2 = 2y$ and the plane $y = z$. I tried parameterizing the curve by expanding the cylinder equation $x^2 + (y-1)^2 = 1$. I think I can write the parameterization as follows: $(r cos(theta), r sin(theta) + 1, 0)$? How do I proceed from here, I want to use Stokes theorem. $mathcal C$ is oriented counterclockwise.
vector-analysis stokes-theorem
You’ve parameterized the projection of the cylinder onto the $x$-$y$ plane. Now use $y=z$ to get the correct curve.
– amd
Aug 6 at 22:53
add a comment |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
$mathcal C$ is the intersection curve between the cylinder $x^2 + y^2 = 2y$ and the plane $y = z$. I tried parameterizing the curve by expanding the cylinder equation $x^2 + (y-1)^2 = 1$. I think I can write the parameterization as follows: $(r cos(theta), r sin(theta) + 1, 0)$? How do I proceed from here, I want to use Stokes theorem. $mathcal C$ is oriented counterclockwise.
vector-analysis stokes-theorem
$mathcal C$ is the intersection curve between the cylinder $x^2 + y^2 = 2y$ and the plane $y = z$. I tried parameterizing the curve by expanding the cylinder equation $x^2 + (y-1)^2 = 1$. I think I can write the parameterization as follows: $(r cos(theta), r sin(theta) + 1, 0)$? How do I proceed from here, I want to use Stokes theorem. $mathcal C$ is oriented counterclockwise.
vector-analysis stokes-theorem
edited Aug 13 at 17:07
Maxim
2,150113
2,150113
asked Aug 6 at 11:26
StudentMaths
246
246
You’ve parameterized the projection of the cylinder onto the $x$-$y$ plane. Now use $y=z$ to get the correct curve.
– amd
Aug 6 at 22:53
add a comment |Â
You’ve parameterized the projection of the cylinder onto the $x$-$y$ plane. Now use $y=z$ to get the correct curve.
– amd
Aug 6 at 22:53
You’ve parameterized the projection of the cylinder onto the $x$-$y$ plane. Now use $y=z$ to get the correct curve.
– amd
Aug 6 at 22:53
You’ve parameterized the projection of the cylinder onto the $x$-$y$ plane. Now use $y=z$ to get the correct curve.
– amd
Aug 6 at 22:53
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
HINT
We have
- $F=(y^2,xy,xz)implies operatornamerot(F)=(0,-z,-y)$
then
$$int_C y^2,dx+xy,dy+xz,dz =int_S operatornamerot(F)cdot n ,dS$$
and
$$operatornamerot(F)cdot n=(0,z,-y)cdot (0,-1/sqrt 2,1/sqrt 2)=frac z sqrt 2-frac y sqrt 2$$
How do you find the normal vector? And should'nt it be rot(F) = (0, -z, -y) ?
– StudentMaths
Aug 6 at 12:46
@StudentMaths Ops...you are right it is rot(F) = (0, -z, -y) of course. For the normal recall that for a plane ax+by+cz+d=0 the normal n=(a,b,c).
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 12:49
Thank you! I get this 1/sqrt(2) * integral 4y dxdy but what are the boundaries? I feel this would be easier to solve with polar coordinates.
– StudentMaths
Aug 6 at 12:54
Since y=z I suppose rot(F)=0.
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 13:00
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Take $S$ to be the region in the plane $y = z$ enclosed by $mathcal C$. Since $nabla times mathbf F = (0, -z, -y)$ is parallel to the plane $y = z$, $(nabla times mathbf F) cdot dmathbf S = 0$.
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
HINT
We have
- $F=(y^2,xy,xz)implies operatornamerot(F)=(0,-z,-y)$
then
$$int_C y^2,dx+xy,dy+xz,dz =int_S operatornamerot(F)cdot n ,dS$$
and
$$operatornamerot(F)cdot n=(0,z,-y)cdot (0,-1/sqrt 2,1/sqrt 2)=frac z sqrt 2-frac y sqrt 2$$
How do you find the normal vector? And should'nt it be rot(F) = (0, -z, -y) ?
– StudentMaths
Aug 6 at 12:46
@StudentMaths Ops...you are right it is rot(F) = (0, -z, -y) of course. For the normal recall that for a plane ax+by+cz+d=0 the normal n=(a,b,c).
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 12:49
Thank you! I get this 1/sqrt(2) * integral 4y dxdy but what are the boundaries? I feel this would be easier to solve with polar coordinates.
– StudentMaths
Aug 6 at 12:54
Since y=z I suppose rot(F)=0.
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 13:00
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
HINT
We have
- $F=(y^2,xy,xz)implies operatornamerot(F)=(0,-z,-y)$
then
$$int_C y^2,dx+xy,dy+xz,dz =int_S operatornamerot(F)cdot n ,dS$$
and
$$operatornamerot(F)cdot n=(0,z,-y)cdot (0,-1/sqrt 2,1/sqrt 2)=frac z sqrt 2-frac y sqrt 2$$
How do you find the normal vector? And should'nt it be rot(F) = (0, -z, -y) ?
– StudentMaths
Aug 6 at 12:46
@StudentMaths Ops...you are right it is rot(F) = (0, -z, -y) of course. For the normal recall that for a plane ax+by+cz+d=0 the normal n=(a,b,c).
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 12:49
Thank you! I get this 1/sqrt(2) * integral 4y dxdy but what are the boundaries? I feel this would be easier to solve with polar coordinates.
– StudentMaths
Aug 6 at 12:54
Since y=z I suppose rot(F)=0.
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 13:00
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
HINT
We have
- $F=(y^2,xy,xz)implies operatornamerot(F)=(0,-z,-y)$
then
$$int_C y^2,dx+xy,dy+xz,dz =int_S operatornamerot(F)cdot n ,dS$$
and
$$operatornamerot(F)cdot n=(0,z,-y)cdot (0,-1/sqrt 2,1/sqrt 2)=frac z sqrt 2-frac y sqrt 2$$
HINT
We have
- $F=(y^2,xy,xz)implies operatornamerot(F)=(0,-z,-y)$
then
$$int_C y^2,dx+xy,dy+xz,dz =int_S operatornamerot(F)cdot n ,dS$$
and
$$operatornamerot(F)cdot n=(0,z,-y)cdot (0,-1/sqrt 2,1/sqrt 2)=frac z sqrt 2-frac y sqrt 2$$
edited Aug 6 at 12:50
answered Aug 6 at 12:39
gimusi
65.4k73684
65.4k73684
How do you find the normal vector? And should'nt it be rot(F) = (0, -z, -y) ?
– StudentMaths
Aug 6 at 12:46
@StudentMaths Ops...you are right it is rot(F) = (0, -z, -y) of course. For the normal recall that for a plane ax+by+cz+d=0 the normal n=(a,b,c).
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 12:49
Thank you! I get this 1/sqrt(2) * integral 4y dxdy but what are the boundaries? I feel this would be easier to solve with polar coordinates.
– StudentMaths
Aug 6 at 12:54
Since y=z I suppose rot(F)=0.
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 13:00
add a comment |Â
How do you find the normal vector? And should'nt it be rot(F) = (0, -z, -y) ?
– StudentMaths
Aug 6 at 12:46
@StudentMaths Ops...you are right it is rot(F) = (0, -z, -y) of course. For the normal recall that for a plane ax+by+cz+d=0 the normal n=(a,b,c).
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 12:49
Thank you! I get this 1/sqrt(2) * integral 4y dxdy but what are the boundaries? I feel this would be easier to solve with polar coordinates.
– StudentMaths
Aug 6 at 12:54
Since y=z I suppose rot(F)=0.
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 13:00
How do you find the normal vector? And should'nt it be rot(F) = (0, -z, -y) ?
– StudentMaths
Aug 6 at 12:46
How do you find the normal vector? And should'nt it be rot(F) = (0, -z, -y) ?
– StudentMaths
Aug 6 at 12:46
@StudentMaths Ops...you are right it is rot(F) = (0, -z, -y) of course. For the normal recall that for a plane ax+by+cz+d=0 the normal n=(a,b,c).
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 12:49
@StudentMaths Ops...you are right it is rot(F) = (0, -z, -y) of course. For the normal recall that for a plane ax+by+cz+d=0 the normal n=(a,b,c).
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 12:49
Thank you! I get this 1/sqrt(2) * integral 4y dxdy but what are the boundaries? I feel this would be easier to solve with polar coordinates.
– StudentMaths
Aug 6 at 12:54
Thank you! I get this 1/sqrt(2) * integral 4y dxdy but what are the boundaries? I feel this would be easier to solve with polar coordinates.
– StudentMaths
Aug 6 at 12:54
Since y=z I suppose rot(F)=0.
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 13:00
Since y=z I suppose rot(F)=0.
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 13:00
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Take $S$ to be the region in the plane $y = z$ enclosed by $mathcal C$. Since $nabla times mathbf F = (0, -z, -y)$ is parallel to the plane $y = z$, $(nabla times mathbf F) cdot dmathbf S = 0$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Take $S$ to be the region in the plane $y = z$ enclosed by $mathcal C$. Since $nabla times mathbf F = (0, -z, -y)$ is parallel to the plane $y = z$, $(nabla times mathbf F) cdot dmathbf S = 0$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Take $S$ to be the region in the plane $y = z$ enclosed by $mathcal C$. Since $nabla times mathbf F = (0, -z, -y)$ is parallel to the plane $y = z$, $(nabla times mathbf F) cdot dmathbf S = 0$.
Take $S$ to be the region in the plane $y = z$ enclosed by $mathcal C$. Since $nabla times mathbf F = (0, -z, -y)$ is parallel to the plane $y = z$, $(nabla times mathbf F) cdot dmathbf S = 0$.
edited Aug 13 at 17:33
answered Aug 13 at 17:03
Maxim
2,150113
2,150113
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2873792%2fstokes-theorem-intersection-between-cylinder-and-plane%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
You’ve parameterized the projection of the cylinder onto the $x$-$y$ plane. Now use $y=z$ to get the correct curve.
– amd
Aug 6 at 22:53