Find the incorrectness of the process.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Assume $$Axi=lambda_1xi $$
then $$Axixi^T=lambda_1xixi^T $$
and $$|Axixi^T|=|lambda_1xixi^T| $$
which we will have
$$|A|cdot |xixi^T|=lambda_1^ncdot|xixi^T|$$
then $$|A|=lambda_1^n$$
But $$|A|=prod_i=1^nlambda_i$$



What's the problem in this process?







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    Writing $|Axixi^T| = |A||xixi^T|$ is incorrect. Here I am interpreting $|A|$ to mean $supx$.
    – caffeinemachine
    Jul 17 at 5:24










  • @caffeinemachine In that case we wouldn't have $|A|=prod_i=1^nlambda_i$. It's most likely meant as determinant.
    – Arthur
    Jul 17 at 5:26










  • Also, perhaps putting brackets would help avoid confusion. For instance, $Axixi^T$ is $(Axi)xi^T$.
    – caffeinemachine
    Jul 17 at 5:26










  • @Arthur I see. Thanks. Then $det((Axi)xi^T) = det(A)det(xixi^T) = det(A)xixi^T$ is also not correct. :)
    – caffeinemachine
    Jul 17 at 5:29










  • @caffeinemachine Is also not claimed in the post. At least the last equality. The first equality you wrote is correct though.
    – Arthur
    Jul 17 at 5:33















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Assume $$Axi=lambda_1xi $$
then $$Axixi^T=lambda_1xixi^T $$
and $$|Axixi^T|=|lambda_1xixi^T| $$
which we will have
$$|A|cdot |xixi^T|=lambda_1^ncdot|xixi^T|$$
then $$|A|=lambda_1^n$$
But $$|A|=prod_i=1^nlambda_i$$



What's the problem in this process?







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    Writing $|Axixi^T| = |A||xixi^T|$ is incorrect. Here I am interpreting $|A|$ to mean $supx$.
    – caffeinemachine
    Jul 17 at 5:24










  • @caffeinemachine In that case we wouldn't have $|A|=prod_i=1^nlambda_i$. It's most likely meant as determinant.
    – Arthur
    Jul 17 at 5:26










  • Also, perhaps putting brackets would help avoid confusion. For instance, $Axixi^T$ is $(Axi)xi^T$.
    – caffeinemachine
    Jul 17 at 5:26










  • @Arthur I see. Thanks. Then $det((Axi)xi^T) = det(A)det(xixi^T) = det(A)xixi^T$ is also not correct. :)
    – caffeinemachine
    Jul 17 at 5:29










  • @caffeinemachine Is also not claimed in the post. At least the last equality. The first equality you wrote is correct though.
    – Arthur
    Jul 17 at 5:33













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Assume $$Axi=lambda_1xi $$
then $$Axixi^T=lambda_1xixi^T $$
and $$|Axixi^T|=|lambda_1xixi^T| $$
which we will have
$$|A|cdot |xixi^T|=lambda_1^ncdot|xixi^T|$$
then $$|A|=lambda_1^n$$
But $$|A|=prod_i=1^nlambda_i$$



What's the problem in this process?







share|cite|improve this question













Assume $$Axi=lambda_1xi $$
then $$Axixi^T=lambda_1xixi^T $$
and $$|Axixi^T|=|lambda_1xixi^T| $$
which we will have
$$|A|cdot |xixi^T|=lambda_1^ncdot|xixi^T|$$
then $$|A|=lambda_1^n$$
But $$|A|=prod_i=1^nlambda_i$$



What's the problem in this process?









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 17 at 9:18









Jneven

514218




514218









asked Jul 17 at 5:19









Jaqen Chou

1646




1646







  • 1




    Writing $|Axixi^T| = |A||xixi^T|$ is incorrect. Here I am interpreting $|A|$ to mean $supx$.
    – caffeinemachine
    Jul 17 at 5:24










  • @caffeinemachine In that case we wouldn't have $|A|=prod_i=1^nlambda_i$. It's most likely meant as determinant.
    – Arthur
    Jul 17 at 5:26










  • Also, perhaps putting brackets would help avoid confusion. For instance, $Axixi^T$ is $(Axi)xi^T$.
    – caffeinemachine
    Jul 17 at 5:26










  • @Arthur I see. Thanks. Then $det((Axi)xi^T) = det(A)det(xixi^T) = det(A)xixi^T$ is also not correct. :)
    – caffeinemachine
    Jul 17 at 5:29










  • @caffeinemachine Is also not claimed in the post. At least the last equality. The first equality you wrote is correct though.
    – Arthur
    Jul 17 at 5:33













  • 1




    Writing $|Axixi^T| = |A||xixi^T|$ is incorrect. Here I am interpreting $|A|$ to mean $supx$.
    – caffeinemachine
    Jul 17 at 5:24










  • @caffeinemachine In that case we wouldn't have $|A|=prod_i=1^nlambda_i$. It's most likely meant as determinant.
    – Arthur
    Jul 17 at 5:26










  • Also, perhaps putting brackets would help avoid confusion. For instance, $Axixi^T$ is $(Axi)xi^T$.
    – caffeinemachine
    Jul 17 at 5:26










  • @Arthur I see. Thanks. Then $det((Axi)xi^T) = det(A)det(xixi^T) = det(A)xixi^T$ is also not correct. :)
    – caffeinemachine
    Jul 17 at 5:29










  • @caffeinemachine Is also not claimed in the post. At least the last equality. The first equality you wrote is correct though.
    – Arthur
    Jul 17 at 5:33








1




1




Writing $|Axixi^T| = |A||xixi^T|$ is incorrect. Here I am interpreting $|A|$ to mean $supx$.
– caffeinemachine
Jul 17 at 5:24




Writing $|Axixi^T| = |A||xixi^T|$ is incorrect. Here I am interpreting $|A|$ to mean $supx$.
– caffeinemachine
Jul 17 at 5:24












@caffeinemachine In that case we wouldn't have $|A|=prod_i=1^nlambda_i$. It's most likely meant as determinant.
– Arthur
Jul 17 at 5:26




@caffeinemachine In that case we wouldn't have $|A|=prod_i=1^nlambda_i$. It's most likely meant as determinant.
– Arthur
Jul 17 at 5:26












Also, perhaps putting brackets would help avoid confusion. For instance, $Axixi^T$ is $(Axi)xi^T$.
– caffeinemachine
Jul 17 at 5:26




Also, perhaps putting brackets would help avoid confusion. For instance, $Axixi^T$ is $(Axi)xi^T$.
– caffeinemachine
Jul 17 at 5:26












@Arthur I see. Thanks. Then $det((Axi)xi^T) = det(A)det(xixi^T) = det(A)xixi^T$ is also not correct. :)
– caffeinemachine
Jul 17 at 5:29




@Arthur I see. Thanks. Then $det((Axi)xi^T) = det(A)det(xixi^T) = det(A)xixi^T$ is also not correct. :)
– caffeinemachine
Jul 17 at 5:29












@caffeinemachine Is also not claimed in the post. At least the last equality. The first equality you wrote is correct though.
– Arthur
Jul 17 at 5:33





@caffeinemachine Is also not claimed in the post. At least the last equality. The first equality you wrote is correct though.
– Arthur
Jul 17 at 5:33











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










Hint: Take a good look at $|xixi^T|$. Think about, say, the rank of that matrix and what that means for the determinant.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Tks. Its rank is less than n.
    – Jaqen Chou
    Jul 17 at 5:28











  • @JaqenChou So, either $n=1$, in which case ..., or $nneq 1$, in which case ...
    – Arthur
    Jul 17 at 5:29










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2854158%2ffind-the-incorrectness-of-the-process%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote



accepted










Hint: Take a good look at $|xixi^T|$. Think about, say, the rank of that matrix and what that means for the determinant.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Tks. Its rank is less than n.
    – Jaqen Chou
    Jul 17 at 5:28











  • @JaqenChou So, either $n=1$, in which case ..., or $nneq 1$, in which case ...
    – Arthur
    Jul 17 at 5:29














up vote
3
down vote



accepted










Hint: Take a good look at $|xixi^T|$. Think about, say, the rank of that matrix and what that means for the determinant.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Tks. Its rank is less than n.
    – Jaqen Chou
    Jul 17 at 5:28











  • @JaqenChou So, either $n=1$, in which case ..., or $nneq 1$, in which case ...
    – Arthur
    Jul 17 at 5:29












up vote
3
down vote



accepted







up vote
3
down vote



accepted






Hint: Take a good look at $|xixi^T|$. Think about, say, the rank of that matrix and what that means for the determinant.






share|cite|improve this answer













Hint: Take a good look at $|xixi^T|$. Think about, say, the rank of that matrix and what that means for the determinant.







share|cite|improve this answer













share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer











answered Jul 17 at 5:22









Arthur

98.9k793175




98.9k793175











  • Tks. Its rank is less than n.
    – Jaqen Chou
    Jul 17 at 5:28











  • @JaqenChou So, either $n=1$, in which case ..., or $nneq 1$, in which case ...
    – Arthur
    Jul 17 at 5:29
















  • Tks. Its rank is less than n.
    – Jaqen Chou
    Jul 17 at 5:28











  • @JaqenChou So, either $n=1$, in which case ..., or $nneq 1$, in which case ...
    – Arthur
    Jul 17 at 5:29















Tks. Its rank is less than n.
– Jaqen Chou
Jul 17 at 5:28





Tks. Its rank is less than n.
– Jaqen Chou
Jul 17 at 5:28













@JaqenChou So, either $n=1$, in which case ..., or $nneq 1$, in which case ...
– Arthur
Jul 17 at 5:29




@JaqenChou So, either $n=1$, in which case ..., or $nneq 1$, in which case ...
– Arthur
Jul 17 at 5:29












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2854158%2ffind-the-incorrectness-of-the-process%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon