If $x_minmathbbR$, $y_n$ is the n'th rational number in $x_m$, and $z_n$ is the n'th irrational number in $x_m$ then [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












If $x_minmathbbR$, $y_n$ is the n'th rational number in $x_m$, and $z_n$ is the n'th irrational number in $x_m$ then



  1. both $y$ and $z$ are the subsequence of $x$

  2. at least one of them is the subsequence of$ x$

  3. Neither $y$ nor $z$ is the subsequence of$x$

I am taking the example the sequence $x(n)=n^1/2$ here both $y$ and $z$ are subsequence of $x$ but I don't know this is true or not in general ....Plz help me







share|cite|improve this question













closed as unclear what you're asking by Did, Adrian Keister, Lord Shark the Unknown, Shailesh, Isaac Browne Jul 31 at 16:47


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • Yes it is true in general. Since you are constructing $y,z$ from $x$.
    – Piyush Divyanakar
    Jul 31 at 5:58










  • The problem is that $y_n$ and $z_n$ need not even be sequences! For example, if you take a sequence of ratonal numbers, like $1,1,1,1,1$, then $z_n$ is not well defined, for example what would $z_1$ be? If the sequence $x_n$ has infinitely many rational and irrational terms, then one can conclude that $y$ and $z$ are both subsequences of $x$.
    – Ð°ÑÑ‚он вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    Jul 31 at 8:18















up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












If $x_minmathbbR$, $y_n$ is the n'th rational number in $x_m$, and $z_n$ is the n'th irrational number in $x_m$ then



  1. both $y$ and $z$ are the subsequence of $x$

  2. at least one of them is the subsequence of$ x$

  3. Neither $y$ nor $z$ is the subsequence of$x$

I am taking the example the sequence $x(n)=n^1/2$ here both $y$ and $z$ are subsequence of $x$ but I don't know this is true or not in general ....Plz help me







share|cite|improve this question













closed as unclear what you're asking by Did, Adrian Keister, Lord Shark the Unknown, Shailesh, Isaac Browne Jul 31 at 16:47


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • Yes it is true in general. Since you are constructing $y,z$ from $x$.
    – Piyush Divyanakar
    Jul 31 at 5:58










  • The problem is that $y_n$ and $z_n$ need not even be sequences! For example, if you take a sequence of ratonal numbers, like $1,1,1,1,1$, then $z_n$ is not well defined, for example what would $z_1$ be? If the sequence $x_n$ has infinitely many rational and irrational terms, then one can conclude that $y$ and $z$ are both subsequences of $x$.
    – Ð°ÑÑ‚он вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    Jul 31 at 8:18













up vote
-1
down vote

favorite









up vote
-1
down vote

favorite











If $x_minmathbbR$, $y_n$ is the n'th rational number in $x_m$, and $z_n$ is the n'th irrational number in $x_m$ then



  1. both $y$ and $z$ are the subsequence of $x$

  2. at least one of them is the subsequence of$ x$

  3. Neither $y$ nor $z$ is the subsequence of$x$

I am taking the example the sequence $x(n)=n^1/2$ here both $y$ and $z$ are subsequence of $x$ but I don't know this is true or not in general ....Plz help me







share|cite|improve this question













If $x_minmathbbR$, $y_n$ is the n'th rational number in $x_m$, and $z_n$ is the n'th irrational number in $x_m$ then



  1. both $y$ and $z$ are the subsequence of $x$

  2. at least one of them is the subsequence of$ x$

  3. Neither $y$ nor $z$ is the subsequence of$x$

I am taking the example the sequence $x(n)=n^1/2$ here both $y$ and $z$ are subsequence of $x$ but I don't know this is true or not in general ....Plz help me









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 31 at 8:18









user529760

511216




511216









asked Jul 31 at 5:50









abhay pratap singh

12




12




closed as unclear what you're asking by Did, Adrian Keister, Lord Shark the Unknown, Shailesh, Isaac Browne Jul 31 at 16:47


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






closed as unclear what you're asking by Did, Adrian Keister, Lord Shark the Unknown, Shailesh, Isaac Browne Jul 31 at 16:47


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Yes it is true in general. Since you are constructing $y,z$ from $x$.
    – Piyush Divyanakar
    Jul 31 at 5:58










  • The problem is that $y_n$ and $z_n$ need not even be sequences! For example, if you take a sequence of ratonal numbers, like $1,1,1,1,1$, then $z_n$ is not well defined, for example what would $z_1$ be? If the sequence $x_n$ has infinitely many rational and irrational terms, then one can conclude that $y$ and $z$ are both subsequences of $x$.
    – Ð°ÑÑ‚он вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    Jul 31 at 8:18

















  • Yes it is true in general. Since you are constructing $y,z$ from $x$.
    – Piyush Divyanakar
    Jul 31 at 5:58










  • The problem is that $y_n$ and $z_n$ need not even be sequences! For example, if you take a sequence of ratonal numbers, like $1,1,1,1,1$, then $z_n$ is not well defined, for example what would $z_1$ be? If the sequence $x_n$ has infinitely many rational and irrational terms, then one can conclude that $y$ and $z$ are both subsequences of $x$.
    – Ð°ÑÑ‚он вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    Jul 31 at 8:18
















Yes it is true in general. Since you are constructing $y,z$ from $x$.
– Piyush Divyanakar
Jul 31 at 5:58




Yes it is true in general. Since you are constructing $y,z$ from $x$.
– Piyush Divyanakar
Jul 31 at 5:58












The problem is that $y_n$ and $z_n$ need not even be sequences! For example, if you take a sequence of ratonal numbers, like $1,1,1,1,1$, then $z_n$ is not well defined, for example what would $z_1$ be? If the sequence $x_n$ has infinitely many rational and irrational terms, then one can conclude that $y$ and $z$ are both subsequences of $x$.
– Ð°ÑÑ‚он вілла олоф мэллбэрг
Jul 31 at 8:18





The problem is that $y_n$ and $z_n$ need not even be sequences! For example, if you take a sequence of ratonal numbers, like $1,1,1,1,1$, then $z_n$ is not well defined, for example what would $z_1$ be? If the sequence $x_n$ has infinitely many rational and irrational terms, then one can conclude that $y$ and $z$ are both subsequences of $x$.
– Ð°ÑÑ‚он вілла олоф мэллбэрг
Jul 31 at 8:18
















active

oldest

votes






















active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?