Let $(x_n)$ and $(y_n)$ be given sequences and define $(z_n)$ to be the “shuffled” sequence…

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1













Let $(x_n)$ and $(y_n)$ be given sequences and define $(z_n)$ to be the "shuffled" sequence $(x_1,y_1,x_2,y_2,x_3,y_3,..., x_n,y_n,...)$. Prove that $(z_n)$ is convergent if and only if $(x_n)$ and $(y_n)$ are convergent and $lim x_n=lim y_n$.




Can someone prove this theorem for me? I am lost and all I have so far is:
So we can write that $(z_2n-1)=(x_n)$ and $(z_2n)=(y_n)$ for $n in mathbb N.$



$(Longrightarrow)$ (Is this correct?)



Assume for $n ge N_1 $ $Rightarrow$ $|x_n-l|< epsilon$ and assume for $n ge N_2 $ $Rightarrow$ $|y_n-l|< epsilon$. Choose $M ge maxN_1, N_2$ and then for $n ge M$ for $2n$ and $2n+1$ is we get $|z_n -l| lt epsilon$.



($Longleftarrow$) I don't have anything for this direction.



Note that this question If $x_n to a$ and $x'_n to a$, then $x_1, x'_1, x_2, x'_2, ... to a$ only addresses the theorem in one direction so it isn't exactly a duplicate.







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite
    1













    Let $(x_n)$ and $(y_n)$ be given sequences and define $(z_n)$ to be the "shuffled" sequence $(x_1,y_1,x_2,y_2,x_3,y_3,..., x_n,y_n,...)$. Prove that $(z_n)$ is convergent if and only if $(x_n)$ and $(y_n)$ are convergent and $lim x_n=lim y_n$.




    Can someone prove this theorem for me? I am lost and all I have so far is:
    So we can write that $(z_2n-1)=(x_n)$ and $(z_2n)=(y_n)$ for $n in mathbb N.$



    $(Longrightarrow)$ (Is this correct?)



    Assume for $n ge N_1 $ $Rightarrow$ $|x_n-l|< epsilon$ and assume for $n ge N_2 $ $Rightarrow$ $|y_n-l|< epsilon$. Choose $M ge maxN_1, N_2$ and then for $n ge M$ for $2n$ and $2n+1$ is we get $|z_n -l| lt epsilon$.



    ($Longleftarrow$) I don't have anything for this direction.



    Note that this question If $x_n to a$ and $x'_n to a$, then $x_1, x'_1, x_2, x'_2, ... to a$ only addresses the theorem in one direction so it isn't exactly a duplicate.







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1






      Let $(x_n)$ and $(y_n)$ be given sequences and define $(z_n)$ to be the "shuffled" sequence $(x_1,y_1,x_2,y_2,x_3,y_3,..., x_n,y_n,...)$. Prove that $(z_n)$ is convergent if and only if $(x_n)$ and $(y_n)$ are convergent and $lim x_n=lim y_n$.




      Can someone prove this theorem for me? I am lost and all I have so far is:
      So we can write that $(z_2n-1)=(x_n)$ and $(z_2n)=(y_n)$ for $n in mathbb N.$



      $(Longrightarrow)$ (Is this correct?)



      Assume for $n ge N_1 $ $Rightarrow$ $|x_n-l|< epsilon$ and assume for $n ge N_2 $ $Rightarrow$ $|y_n-l|< epsilon$. Choose $M ge maxN_1, N_2$ and then for $n ge M$ for $2n$ and $2n+1$ is we get $|z_n -l| lt epsilon$.



      ($Longleftarrow$) I don't have anything for this direction.



      Note that this question If $x_n to a$ and $x'_n to a$, then $x_1, x'_1, x_2, x'_2, ... to a$ only addresses the theorem in one direction so it isn't exactly a duplicate.







      share|cite|improve this question














      Let $(x_n)$ and $(y_n)$ be given sequences and define $(z_n)$ to be the "shuffled" sequence $(x_1,y_1,x_2,y_2,x_3,y_3,..., x_n,y_n,...)$. Prove that $(z_n)$ is convergent if and only if $(x_n)$ and $(y_n)$ are convergent and $lim x_n=lim y_n$.




      Can someone prove this theorem for me? I am lost and all I have so far is:
      So we can write that $(z_2n-1)=(x_n)$ and $(z_2n)=(y_n)$ for $n in mathbb N.$



      $(Longrightarrow)$ (Is this correct?)



      Assume for $n ge N_1 $ $Rightarrow$ $|x_n-l|< epsilon$ and assume for $n ge N_2 $ $Rightarrow$ $|y_n-l|< epsilon$. Choose $M ge maxN_1, N_2$ and then for $n ge M$ for $2n$ and $2n+1$ is we get $|z_n -l| lt epsilon$.



      ($Longleftarrow$) I don't have anything for this direction.



      Note that this question If $x_n to a$ and $x'_n to a$, then $x_1, x'_1, x_2, x'_2, ... to a$ only addresses the theorem in one direction so it isn't exactly a duplicate.









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jul 18 at 1:33
























      asked Jul 18 at 1:12









      Red

      1,747733




      1,747733




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Let $x_n_n=1^infty$ and $y_n_n=1^infty$ be two sequences of real numbers. We define the sequence $z_n_n=1^infty$ by setting $z_2n-1:=x_n$ and $z_2n:=y_n$ for each $n=1,2,ldots$.



          $(Longleftarrow)$ Suppose $undersetn to inftylimz_n=L.$ Let $varepsilon>0$ be given. Since $z_n to L$ as $n to infty$, there is a positive integer $N$ so that
          beginequation |z_n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N.
          endequation
          Now notice that if $n geq N$, then $2n-1 geq N$ and $2n geq N$. Thus we have
          beginaligned &|x_n-L|=|z_2n-1-L|<varepsilon text, and \& |y_n-L|=|z_2n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N.
          endaligned
          Therefore, $undersetn to inftylimx_n=L=undersetn to inftylimy_n$.



          $(Longrightarrow)$ Suppose $undersetn to inftylimx_n=L=undersetn to inftylimy_n$. Let $varepsilon>0$ be given. Since the sequences $x_n_n=1^infty$ and $y_n_n=1^infty$ both converge to the common limit $L$, there exist positive integers $N_1$ and $N_2$ so that
          beginequation |x_n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N_1
          endequation
          and
          beginequation |y_n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N_2.
          endequation
          Set $N=max2N_1, 2N_2$. Thus we have
          beginequation |z_n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N.
          endequation
          Therefore, $z_n_n=1^infty$ is a convergent sequence, by definition.






          share|cite|improve this answer






























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Sometimes it helps to prove a more general statement.



            Prove that if a sequence converges then so does any subsequence and both limits are the same. It is not too hard to visualise why this is true.



            In this case both $x_n$ and $y_n$ are subsequences of $z_n$ so the proof will be done.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • I see the intuition behind it but writing is whats frustrating,,, Also the book hasn't yet introduce the theorem which says subsequences converge to the same limit so I didn't want to "cheat" and simply evoke it. I got the feeling the book wanted me to write it out explicitly.
              – Red
              Jul 18 at 1:21










            • What I am proposing is that you prove the statement. Showing that a specific result is a simple consequence of a more general result is good mathematical practice.
              – Bernard W
              Jul 18 at 1:24


















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            $implies$: If $(a_n)$ converges with limit $a$, every subsequence converges with limit $a$.



            Proof: For alle $epsilon>0$ exists $N$ such that $|a_n-a|<epsilon$ for all $nge N$ and notably $|a_n_k-a|<epsilon$ for all $n_kge N$. In other words there exists $K$ such that $n_Kge N$ and $|a_n_k-a|<epsilon$ for all $kge K$. Thus all subsequences converge with the same limit as the convergent sequence.



            $impliedby$: Hint: Select the largest of the two $N$'s that leads to convergence of the subsequences and see where that takes you.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















              Your Answer




              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: false,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );








               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2855081%2flet-x-n-and-y-n-be-given-sequences-and-define-z-n-to-be-the-shuffle%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest






























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              Let $x_n_n=1^infty$ and $y_n_n=1^infty$ be two sequences of real numbers. We define the sequence $z_n_n=1^infty$ by setting $z_2n-1:=x_n$ and $z_2n:=y_n$ for each $n=1,2,ldots$.



              $(Longleftarrow)$ Suppose $undersetn to inftylimz_n=L.$ Let $varepsilon>0$ be given. Since $z_n to L$ as $n to infty$, there is a positive integer $N$ so that
              beginequation |z_n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N.
              endequation
              Now notice that if $n geq N$, then $2n-1 geq N$ and $2n geq N$. Thus we have
              beginaligned &|x_n-L|=|z_2n-1-L|<varepsilon text, and \& |y_n-L|=|z_2n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N.
              endaligned
              Therefore, $undersetn to inftylimx_n=L=undersetn to inftylimy_n$.



              $(Longrightarrow)$ Suppose $undersetn to inftylimx_n=L=undersetn to inftylimy_n$. Let $varepsilon>0$ be given. Since the sequences $x_n_n=1^infty$ and $y_n_n=1^infty$ both converge to the common limit $L$, there exist positive integers $N_1$ and $N_2$ so that
              beginequation |x_n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N_1
              endequation
              and
              beginequation |y_n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N_2.
              endequation
              Set $N=max2N_1, 2N_2$. Thus we have
              beginequation |z_n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N.
              endequation
              Therefore, $z_n_n=1^infty$ is a convergent sequence, by definition.






              share|cite|improve this answer



























                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted










                Let $x_n_n=1^infty$ and $y_n_n=1^infty$ be two sequences of real numbers. We define the sequence $z_n_n=1^infty$ by setting $z_2n-1:=x_n$ and $z_2n:=y_n$ for each $n=1,2,ldots$.



                $(Longleftarrow)$ Suppose $undersetn to inftylimz_n=L.$ Let $varepsilon>0$ be given. Since $z_n to L$ as $n to infty$, there is a positive integer $N$ so that
                beginequation |z_n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N.
                endequation
                Now notice that if $n geq N$, then $2n-1 geq N$ and $2n geq N$. Thus we have
                beginaligned &|x_n-L|=|z_2n-1-L|<varepsilon text, and \& |y_n-L|=|z_2n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N.
                endaligned
                Therefore, $undersetn to inftylimx_n=L=undersetn to inftylimy_n$.



                $(Longrightarrow)$ Suppose $undersetn to inftylimx_n=L=undersetn to inftylimy_n$. Let $varepsilon>0$ be given. Since the sequences $x_n_n=1^infty$ and $y_n_n=1^infty$ both converge to the common limit $L$, there exist positive integers $N_1$ and $N_2$ so that
                beginequation |x_n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N_1
                endequation
                and
                beginequation |y_n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N_2.
                endequation
                Set $N=max2N_1, 2N_2$. Thus we have
                beginequation |z_n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N.
                endequation
                Therefore, $z_n_n=1^infty$ is a convergent sequence, by definition.






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote



                  accepted







                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote



                  accepted






                  Let $x_n_n=1^infty$ and $y_n_n=1^infty$ be two sequences of real numbers. We define the sequence $z_n_n=1^infty$ by setting $z_2n-1:=x_n$ and $z_2n:=y_n$ for each $n=1,2,ldots$.



                  $(Longleftarrow)$ Suppose $undersetn to inftylimz_n=L.$ Let $varepsilon>0$ be given. Since $z_n to L$ as $n to infty$, there is a positive integer $N$ so that
                  beginequation |z_n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N.
                  endequation
                  Now notice that if $n geq N$, then $2n-1 geq N$ and $2n geq N$. Thus we have
                  beginaligned &|x_n-L|=|z_2n-1-L|<varepsilon text, and \& |y_n-L|=|z_2n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N.
                  endaligned
                  Therefore, $undersetn to inftylimx_n=L=undersetn to inftylimy_n$.



                  $(Longrightarrow)$ Suppose $undersetn to inftylimx_n=L=undersetn to inftylimy_n$. Let $varepsilon>0$ be given. Since the sequences $x_n_n=1^infty$ and $y_n_n=1^infty$ both converge to the common limit $L$, there exist positive integers $N_1$ and $N_2$ so that
                  beginequation |x_n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N_1
                  endequation
                  and
                  beginequation |y_n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N_2.
                  endequation
                  Set $N=max2N_1, 2N_2$. Thus we have
                  beginequation |z_n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N.
                  endequation
                  Therefore, $z_n_n=1^infty$ is a convergent sequence, by definition.






                  share|cite|improve this answer















                  Let $x_n_n=1^infty$ and $y_n_n=1^infty$ be two sequences of real numbers. We define the sequence $z_n_n=1^infty$ by setting $z_2n-1:=x_n$ and $z_2n:=y_n$ for each $n=1,2,ldots$.



                  $(Longleftarrow)$ Suppose $undersetn to inftylimz_n=L.$ Let $varepsilon>0$ be given. Since $z_n to L$ as $n to infty$, there is a positive integer $N$ so that
                  beginequation |z_n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N.
                  endequation
                  Now notice that if $n geq N$, then $2n-1 geq N$ and $2n geq N$. Thus we have
                  beginaligned &|x_n-L|=|z_2n-1-L|<varepsilon text, and \& |y_n-L|=|z_2n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N.
                  endaligned
                  Therefore, $undersetn to inftylimx_n=L=undersetn to inftylimy_n$.



                  $(Longrightarrow)$ Suppose $undersetn to inftylimx_n=L=undersetn to inftylimy_n$. Let $varepsilon>0$ be given. Since the sequences $x_n_n=1^infty$ and $y_n_n=1^infty$ both converge to the common limit $L$, there exist positive integers $N_1$ and $N_2$ so that
                  beginequation |x_n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N_1
                  endequation
                  and
                  beginequation |y_n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N_2.
                  endequation
                  Set $N=max2N_1, 2N_2$. Thus we have
                  beginequation |z_n-L|<varepsilon text whenever n geq N.
                  endequation
                  Therefore, $z_n_n=1^infty$ is a convergent sequence, by definition.







                  share|cite|improve this answer















                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jul 18 at 6:40


























                  answered Jul 18 at 1:55









                  Matt A Pelto

                  1,709419




                  1,709419




















                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote













                      Sometimes it helps to prove a more general statement.



                      Prove that if a sequence converges then so does any subsequence and both limits are the same. It is not too hard to visualise why this is true.



                      In this case both $x_n$ and $y_n$ are subsequences of $z_n$ so the proof will be done.






                      share|cite|improve this answer





















                      • I see the intuition behind it but writing is whats frustrating,,, Also the book hasn't yet introduce the theorem which says subsequences converge to the same limit so I didn't want to "cheat" and simply evoke it. I got the feeling the book wanted me to write it out explicitly.
                        – Red
                        Jul 18 at 1:21










                      • What I am proposing is that you prove the statement. Showing that a specific result is a simple consequence of a more general result is good mathematical practice.
                        – Bernard W
                        Jul 18 at 1:24















                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote













                      Sometimes it helps to prove a more general statement.



                      Prove that if a sequence converges then so does any subsequence and both limits are the same. It is not too hard to visualise why this is true.



                      In this case both $x_n$ and $y_n$ are subsequences of $z_n$ so the proof will be done.






                      share|cite|improve this answer





















                      • I see the intuition behind it but writing is whats frustrating,,, Also the book hasn't yet introduce the theorem which says subsequences converge to the same limit so I didn't want to "cheat" and simply evoke it. I got the feeling the book wanted me to write it out explicitly.
                        – Red
                        Jul 18 at 1:21










                      • What I am proposing is that you prove the statement. Showing that a specific result is a simple consequence of a more general result is good mathematical practice.
                        – Bernard W
                        Jul 18 at 1:24













                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote









                      Sometimes it helps to prove a more general statement.



                      Prove that if a sequence converges then so does any subsequence and both limits are the same. It is not too hard to visualise why this is true.



                      In this case both $x_n$ and $y_n$ are subsequences of $z_n$ so the proof will be done.






                      share|cite|improve this answer













                      Sometimes it helps to prove a more general statement.



                      Prove that if a sequence converges then so does any subsequence and both limits are the same. It is not too hard to visualise why this is true.



                      In this case both $x_n$ and $y_n$ are subsequences of $z_n$ so the proof will be done.







                      share|cite|improve this answer













                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      answered Jul 18 at 1:18









                      Bernard W

                      1,333411




                      1,333411











                      • I see the intuition behind it but writing is whats frustrating,,, Also the book hasn't yet introduce the theorem which says subsequences converge to the same limit so I didn't want to "cheat" and simply evoke it. I got the feeling the book wanted me to write it out explicitly.
                        – Red
                        Jul 18 at 1:21










                      • What I am proposing is that you prove the statement. Showing that a specific result is a simple consequence of a more general result is good mathematical practice.
                        – Bernard W
                        Jul 18 at 1:24

















                      • I see the intuition behind it but writing is whats frustrating,,, Also the book hasn't yet introduce the theorem which says subsequences converge to the same limit so I didn't want to "cheat" and simply evoke it. I got the feeling the book wanted me to write it out explicitly.
                        – Red
                        Jul 18 at 1:21










                      • What I am proposing is that you prove the statement. Showing that a specific result is a simple consequence of a more general result is good mathematical practice.
                        – Bernard W
                        Jul 18 at 1:24
















                      I see the intuition behind it but writing is whats frustrating,,, Also the book hasn't yet introduce the theorem which says subsequences converge to the same limit so I didn't want to "cheat" and simply evoke it. I got the feeling the book wanted me to write it out explicitly.
                      – Red
                      Jul 18 at 1:21




                      I see the intuition behind it but writing is whats frustrating,,, Also the book hasn't yet introduce the theorem which says subsequences converge to the same limit so I didn't want to "cheat" and simply evoke it. I got the feeling the book wanted me to write it out explicitly.
                      – Red
                      Jul 18 at 1:21












                      What I am proposing is that you prove the statement. Showing that a specific result is a simple consequence of a more general result is good mathematical practice.
                      – Bernard W
                      Jul 18 at 1:24





                      What I am proposing is that you prove the statement. Showing that a specific result is a simple consequence of a more general result is good mathematical practice.
                      – Bernard W
                      Jul 18 at 1:24











                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote













                      $implies$: If $(a_n)$ converges with limit $a$, every subsequence converges with limit $a$.



                      Proof: For alle $epsilon>0$ exists $N$ such that $|a_n-a|<epsilon$ for all $nge N$ and notably $|a_n_k-a|<epsilon$ for all $n_kge N$. In other words there exists $K$ such that $n_Kge N$ and $|a_n_k-a|<epsilon$ for all $kge K$. Thus all subsequences converge with the same limit as the convergent sequence.



                      $impliedby$: Hint: Select the largest of the two $N$'s that leads to convergence of the subsequences and see where that takes you.






                      share|cite|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        $implies$: If $(a_n)$ converges with limit $a$, every subsequence converges with limit $a$.



                        Proof: For alle $epsilon>0$ exists $N$ such that $|a_n-a|<epsilon$ for all $nge N$ and notably $|a_n_k-a|<epsilon$ for all $n_kge N$. In other words there exists $K$ such that $n_Kge N$ and $|a_n_k-a|<epsilon$ for all $kge K$. Thus all subsequences converge with the same limit as the convergent sequence.



                        $impliedby$: Hint: Select the largest of the two $N$'s that leads to convergence of the subsequences and see where that takes you.






                        share|cite|improve this answer























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote









                          $implies$: If $(a_n)$ converges with limit $a$, every subsequence converges with limit $a$.



                          Proof: For alle $epsilon>0$ exists $N$ such that $|a_n-a|<epsilon$ for all $nge N$ and notably $|a_n_k-a|<epsilon$ for all $n_kge N$. In other words there exists $K$ such that $n_Kge N$ and $|a_n_k-a|<epsilon$ for all $kge K$. Thus all subsequences converge with the same limit as the convergent sequence.



                          $impliedby$: Hint: Select the largest of the two $N$'s that leads to convergence of the subsequences and see where that takes you.






                          share|cite|improve this answer













                          $implies$: If $(a_n)$ converges with limit $a$, every subsequence converges with limit $a$.



                          Proof: For alle $epsilon>0$ exists $N$ such that $|a_n-a|<epsilon$ for all $nge N$ and notably $|a_n_k-a|<epsilon$ for all $n_kge N$. In other words there exists $K$ such that $n_Kge N$ and $|a_n_k-a|<epsilon$ for all $kge K$. Thus all subsequences converge with the same limit as the convergent sequence.



                          $impliedby$: Hint: Select the largest of the two $N$'s that leads to convergence of the subsequences and see where that takes you.







                          share|cite|improve this answer













                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          answered Jul 18 at 2:02









                          bubububub

                          939




                          939






















                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded


























                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2855081%2flet-x-n-and-y-n-be-given-sequences-and-define-z-n-to-be-the-shuffle%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest













































































                              Comments

                              Popular posts from this blog

                              What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                              Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                              Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?