Linear function, that is not continuous?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Let $V:=fquadtextcontinuous$ provided with the norm $|f|_1:=int_0^1 |f(x)|, dx$ for $fin V$.




Show that $varphi : VtomathbbR$, $varphi(f):=f(0)$ is linear but not continuous.




It is easy to show, that $varphi$ is linear. Let $ainmathbbR$ and $f,gin V$. Then $varphi(af+g)=(af+g)(0)=af(0)+g(0)=avarphi(f)+varphi(g)$.



Now I want to show, that it is not linear.
I know some equivalent statements for a linear function $f:Vto W$ between two normed spaces, which I tried to disprove.



First, that there exists a $c>0$ such that $|f(v)|leq ccdot |v|$ for every $vin V$



I tried several sequences of functions, but they did not work out.



What I want to do is to give a sequence such that $f_n(0)=textconstant>0$ but $|f_n|_1to 0$ or that $f_n(0)to infty$ while $|f_n|_1$ stays bounded.



But nothing really worked. I tried a lot with $cos(nx)$ but the absolute value makes it hard to inegrate.
$cos$ or $sin$ should be involved I guess.



Hints are appreciated.



Thanks in advance.







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $V:=fquadtextcontinuous$ provided with the norm $|f|_1:=int_0^1 |f(x)|, dx$ for $fin V$.




    Show that $varphi : VtomathbbR$, $varphi(f):=f(0)$ is linear but not continuous.




    It is easy to show, that $varphi$ is linear. Let $ainmathbbR$ and $f,gin V$. Then $varphi(af+g)=(af+g)(0)=af(0)+g(0)=avarphi(f)+varphi(g)$.



    Now I want to show, that it is not linear.
    I know some equivalent statements for a linear function $f:Vto W$ between two normed spaces, which I tried to disprove.



    First, that there exists a $c>0$ such that $|f(v)|leq ccdot |v|$ for every $vin V$



    I tried several sequences of functions, but they did not work out.



    What I want to do is to give a sequence such that $f_n(0)=textconstant>0$ but $|f_n|_1to 0$ or that $f_n(0)to infty$ while $|f_n|_1$ stays bounded.



    But nothing really worked. I tried a lot with $cos(nx)$ but the absolute value makes it hard to inegrate.
    $cos$ or $sin$ should be involved I guess.



    Hints are appreciated.



    Thanks in advance.







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $V:=fquadtextcontinuous$ provided with the norm $|f|_1:=int_0^1 |f(x)|, dx$ for $fin V$.




      Show that $varphi : VtomathbbR$, $varphi(f):=f(0)$ is linear but not continuous.




      It is easy to show, that $varphi$ is linear. Let $ainmathbbR$ and $f,gin V$. Then $varphi(af+g)=(af+g)(0)=af(0)+g(0)=avarphi(f)+varphi(g)$.



      Now I want to show, that it is not linear.
      I know some equivalent statements for a linear function $f:Vto W$ between two normed spaces, which I tried to disprove.



      First, that there exists a $c>0$ such that $|f(v)|leq ccdot |v|$ for every $vin V$



      I tried several sequences of functions, but they did not work out.



      What I want to do is to give a sequence such that $f_n(0)=textconstant>0$ but $|f_n|_1to 0$ or that $f_n(0)to infty$ while $|f_n|_1$ stays bounded.



      But nothing really worked. I tried a lot with $cos(nx)$ but the absolute value makes it hard to inegrate.
      $cos$ or $sin$ should be involved I guess.



      Hints are appreciated.



      Thanks in advance.







      share|cite|improve this question











      Let $V:=fquadtextcontinuous$ provided with the norm $|f|_1:=int_0^1 |f(x)|, dx$ for $fin V$.




      Show that $varphi : VtomathbbR$, $varphi(f):=f(0)$ is linear but not continuous.




      It is easy to show, that $varphi$ is linear. Let $ainmathbbR$ and $f,gin V$. Then $varphi(af+g)=(af+g)(0)=af(0)+g(0)=avarphi(f)+varphi(g)$.



      Now I want to show, that it is not linear.
      I know some equivalent statements for a linear function $f:Vto W$ between two normed spaces, which I tried to disprove.



      First, that there exists a $c>0$ such that $|f(v)|leq ccdot |v|$ for every $vin V$



      I tried several sequences of functions, but they did not work out.



      What I want to do is to give a sequence such that $f_n(0)=textconstant>0$ but $|f_n|_1to 0$ or that $f_n(0)to infty$ while $|f_n|_1$ stays bounded.



      But nothing really worked. I tried a lot with $cos(nx)$ but the absolute value makes it hard to inegrate.
      $cos$ or $sin$ should be involved I guess.



      Hints are appreciated.



      Thanks in advance.









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 18 at 18:11









      Cornman

      2,48921128




      2,48921128




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Try with $f_n(t)=(1-t)^n$. The sequence $(f_n)_ninmathbb N$ converges to the null function, but you don't have $lim_ninmathbb Nvarphi(f_n)=varphi(0)=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 2




            Thank you. I feel so dumb right now, because my first try was $(1+x)^n$ but it did not work. And now a solution is just $(1-x)^n$. How could I not think about it... I tried at least one hour. Arrgh..
            – Cornman
            Jul 18 at 18:16










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2855850%2flinear-function-that-is-not-continuous%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Try with $f_n(t)=(1-t)^n$. The sequence $(f_n)_ninmathbb N$ converges to the null function, but you don't have $lim_ninmathbb Nvarphi(f_n)=varphi(0)=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 2




            Thank you. I feel so dumb right now, because my first try was $(1+x)^n$ but it did not work. And now a solution is just $(1-x)^n$. How could I not think about it... I tried at least one hour. Arrgh..
            – Cornman
            Jul 18 at 18:16














          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Try with $f_n(t)=(1-t)^n$. The sequence $(f_n)_ninmathbb N$ converges to the null function, but you don't have $lim_ninmathbb Nvarphi(f_n)=varphi(0)=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 2




            Thank you. I feel so dumb right now, because my first try was $(1+x)^n$ but it did not work. And now a solution is just $(1-x)^n$. How could I not think about it... I tried at least one hour. Arrgh..
            – Cornman
            Jul 18 at 18:16












          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          Try with $f_n(t)=(1-t)^n$. The sequence $(f_n)_ninmathbb N$ converges to the null function, but you don't have $lim_ninmathbb Nvarphi(f_n)=varphi(0)=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer













          Try with $f_n(t)=(1-t)^n$. The sequence $(f_n)_ninmathbb N$ converges to the null function, but you don't have $lim_ninmathbb Nvarphi(f_n)=varphi(0)=0$.







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer











          answered Jul 18 at 18:13









          José Carlos Santos

          114k1698177




          114k1698177







          • 2




            Thank you. I feel so dumb right now, because my first try was $(1+x)^n$ but it did not work. And now a solution is just $(1-x)^n$. How could I not think about it... I tried at least one hour. Arrgh..
            – Cornman
            Jul 18 at 18:16












          • 2




            Thank you. I feel so dumb right now, because my first try was $(1+x)^n$ but it did not work. And now a solution is just $(1-x)^n$. How could I not think about it... I tried at least one hour. Arrgh..
            – Cornman
            Jul 18 at 18:16







          2




          2




          Thank you. I feel so dumb right now, because my first try was $(1+x)^n$ but it did not work. And now a solution is just $(1-x)^n$. How could I not think about it... I tried at least one hour. Arrgh..
          – Cornman
          Jul 18 at 18:16




          Thank you. I feel so dumb right now, because my first try was $(1+x)^n$ but it did not work. And now a solution is just $(1-x)^n$. How could I not think about it... I tried at least one hour. Arrgh..
          – Cornman
          Jul 18 at 18:16












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2855850%2flinear-function-that-is-not-continuous%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?