Is a subspace of a k-space is a k-space?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












My definition of $k$-space is:



Let be $(X,tau)$ a topological subspace and $Asubset X$.



$A$ is a $k$-closed in $X$ if $forall Ksubset X$ compact it happens that $Acap K$ is closed in $K$.



$X$ is a k-space if every $k$-closed of $X$ is closed in $X$.



My question is the following:



I was trying to prove that every closed subspace of a $k$-space is a $k$-space, but in my demonstration I do not use that subspace to be closed. If someone can gave me a clue that is wrong in my demonstration I would appreciate it.



Let be $(X,tau)$ a $k$-space and $Asubset X$ closed, then $(A,tau_A)$ is a $k$-space.



Proof:



Let be $Bsubset A$ a $k$-closed.



Then $forall Ksubset A$ compact it happens that $Bcap K$ is closed in $K$.



As $Ksubset A subset X$ and compactness is an absolute property, then $K$ is compact in $X$



$Rightarrow$ $forall K$ compact of $X$ it happens that $Bcap K$ is closed in $K$



$Rightarrow$ $B$ is a $k$-closed of $X$ and $X$ is a $k$-space, then $B$ is closed in $X$.



Finally $overlineB^A=overlineB^Xcap A=Bcap A=B$



$Rightarrow$ $B$ is closed in $A$ and therefore $A$ is a $k$-space



Obs: I mean absolute compactness for the following:



Theorem: Let be $(X,tau)$ a topological space and $Asubset X$, then $Bsubset A$ is compact in $A$ if and only if $B$ is compact in $X$.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • This question was answered here math.stackexchange.com/q/1416556/55622. Compare proofs and maybe you can find your mistake.
    – Oliver Jones
    Jul 20 at 0:10










  • Your statement "$forall K$ compact of $X$ it happens that $Bcap K$ is closed in $K$" does not seem to follow from anything stated previously.
    – bof
    Jul 20 at 0:25










  • what I would like to show is that $B$ is a $k$-closed of $X$ to use the hypothesis that $X$ is a $k$-space and conclude that $B$ is closed in $X$ and then use the paragraph that says finally in my demonstration. But to see that $B$ is a $k$-closed in $X$, I need to see that for all compact $K$ of $X$ (not compact in $A$) the intersection $Bcap K$ is closed in $K$ and according to me that's where I use that compactness is an absolute property.
    – Israel
    Jul 20 at 3:27







  • 1




    Suppose $K$ is a compact subset of $X,$ how do you know that $Bcap K$ is closed in $K?$ If $Ksubset A$ then $K$ is a compact subset of $A,$ so you can use the fact that $B$ is $k$-closed in $A;$ but what if $Knotsubset A?$
    – bof
    Jul 20 at 3:32











  • Now, if $A$ happens to be closed, then $Kcap B$ is compact so you can use that; but you say you are not assuming that $A$ is closed.
    – bof
    Jul 20 at 3:36














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












My definition of $k$-space is:



Let be $(X,tau)$ a topological subspace and $Asubset X$.



$A$ is a $k$-closed in $X$ if $forall Ksubset X$ compact it happens that $Acap K$ is closed in $K$.



$X$ is a k-space if every $k$-closed of $X$ is closed in $X$.



My question is the following:



I was trying to prove that every closed subspace of a $k$-space is a $k$-space, but in my demonstration I do not use that subspace to be closed. If someone can gave me a clue that is wrong in my demonstration I would appreciate it.



Let be $(X,tau)$ a $k$-space and $Asubset X$ closed, then $(A,tau_A)$ is a $k$-space.



Proof:



Let be $Bsubset A$ a $k$-closed.



Then $forall Ksubset A$ compact it happens that $Bcap K$ is closed in $K$.



As $Ksubset A subset X$ and compactness is an absolute property, then $K$ is compact in $X$



$Rightarrow$ $forall K$ compact of $X$ it happens that $Bcap K$ is closed in $K$



$Rightarrow$ $B$ is a $k$-closed of $X$ and $X$ is a $k$-space, then $B$ is closed in $X$.



Finally $overlineB^A=overlineB^Xcap A=Bcap A=B$



$Rightarrow$ $B$ is closed in $A$ and therefore $A$ is a $k$-space



Obs: I mean absolute compactness for the following:



Theorem: Let be $(X,tau)$ a topological space and $Asubset X$, then $Bsubset A$ is compact in $A$ if and only if $B$ is compact in $X$.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • This question was answered here math.stackexchange.com/q/1416556/55622. Compare proofs and maybe you can find your mistake.
    – Oliver Jones
    Jul 20 at 0:10










  • Your statement "$forall K$ compact of $X$ it happens that $Bcap K$ is closed in $K$" does not seem to follow from anything stated previously.
    – bof
    Jul 20 at 0:25










  • what I would like to show is that $B$ is a $k$-closed of $X$ to use the hypothesis that $X$ is a $k$-space and conclude that $B$ is closed in $X$ and then use the paragraph that says finally in my demonstration. But to see that $B$ is a $k$-closed in $X$, I need to see that for all compact $K$ of $X$ (not compact in $A$) the intersection $Bcap K$ is closed in $K$ and according to me that's where I use that compactness is an absolute property.
    – Israel
    Jul 20 at 3:27







  • 1




    Suppose $K$ is a compact subset of $X,$ how do you know that $Bcap K$ is closed in $K?$ If $Ksubset A$ then $K$ is a compact subset of $A,$ so you can use the fact that $B$ is $k$-closed in $A;$ but what if $Knotsubset A?$
    – bof
    Jul 20 at 3:32











  • Now, if $A$ happens to be closed, then $Kcap B$ is compact so you can use that; but you say you are not assuming that $A$ is closed.
    – bof
    Jul 20 at 3:36












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











My definition of $k$-space is:



Let be $(X,tau)$ a topological subspace and $Asubset X$.



$A$ is a $k$-closed in $X$ if $forall Ksubset X$ compact it happens that $Acap K$ is closed in $K$.



$X$ is a k-space if every $k$-closed of $X$ is closed in $X$.



My question is the following:



I was trying to prove that every closed subspace of a $k$-space is a $k$-space, but in my demonstration I do not use that subspace to be closed. If someone can gave me a clue that is wrong in my demonstration I would appreciate it.



Let be $(X,tau)$ a $k$-space and $Asubset X$ closed, then $(A,tau_A)$ is a $k$-space.



Proof:



Let be $Bsubset A$ a $k$-closed.



Then $forall Ksubset A$ compact it happens that $Bcap K$ is closed in $K$.



As $Ksubset A subset X$ and compactness is an absolute property, then $K$ is compact in $X$



$Rightarrow$ $forall K$ compact of $X$ it happens that $Bcap K$ is closed in $K$



$Rightarrow$ $B$ is a $k$-closed of $X$ and $X$ is a $k$-space, then $B$ is closed in $X$.



Finally $overlineB^A=overlineB^Xcap A=Bcap A=B$



$Rightarrow$ $B$ is closed in $A$ and therefore $A$ is a $k$-space



Obs: I mean absolute compactness for the following:



Theorem: Let be $(X,tau)$ a topological space and $Asubset X$, then $Bsubset A$ is compact in $A$ if and only if $B$ is compact in $X$.







share|cite|improve this question













My definition of $k$-space is:



Let be $(X,tau)$ a topological subspace and $Asubset X$.



$A$ is a $k$-closed in $X$ if $forall Ksubset X$ compact it happens that $Acap K$ is closed in $K$.



$X$ is a k-space if every $k$-closed of $X$ is closed in $X$.



My question is the following:



I was trying to prove that every closed subspace of a $k$-space is a $k$-space, but in my demonstration I do not use that subspace to be closed. If someone can gave me a clue that is wrong in my demonstration I would appreciate it.



Let be $(X,tau)$ a $k$-space and $Asubset X$ closed, then $(A,tau_A)$ is a $k$-space.



Proof:



Let be $Bsubset A$ a $k$-closed.



Then $forall Ksubset A$ compact it happens that $Bcap K$ is closed in $K$.



As $Ksubset A subset X$ and compactness is an absolute property, then $K$ is compact in $X$



$Rightarrow$ $forall K$ compact of $X$ it happens that $Bcap K$ is closed in $K$



$Rightarrow$ $B$ is a $k$-closed of $X$ and $X$ is a $k$-space, then $B$ is closed in $X$.



Finally $overlineB^A=overlineB^Xcap A=Bcap A=B$



$Rightarrow$ $B$ is closed in $A$ and therefore $A$ is a $k$-space



Obs: I mean absolute compactness for the following:



Theorem: Let be $(X,tau)$ a topological space and $Asubset X$, then $Bsubset A$ is compact in $A$ if and only if $B$ is compact in $X$.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 20 at 3:23
























asked Jul 19 at 23:34









Israel

589




589











  • This question was answered here math.stackexchange.com/q/1416556/55622. Compare proofs and maybe you can find your mistake.
    – Oliver Jones
    Jul 20 at 0:10










  • Your statement "$forall K$ compact of $X$ it happens that $Bcap K$ is closed in $K$" does not seem to follow from anything stated previously.
    – bof
    Jul 20 at 0:25










  • what I would like to show is that $B$ is a $k$-closed of $X$ to use the hypothesis that $X$ is a $k$-space and conclude that $B$ is closed in $X$ and then use the paragraph that says finally in my demonstration. But to see that $B$ is a $k$-closed in $X$, I need to see that for all compact $K$ of $X$ (not compact in $A$) the intersection $Bcap K$ is closed in $K$ and according to me that's where I use that compactness is an absolute property.
    – Israel
    Jul 20 at 3:27







  • 1




    Suppose $K$ is a compact subset of $X,$ how do you know that $Bcap K$ is closed in $K?$ If $Ksubset A$ then $K$ is a compact subset of $A,$ so you can use the fact that $B$ is $k$-closed in $A;$ but what if $Knotsubset A?$
    – bof
    Jul 20 at 3:32











  • Now, if $A$ happens to be closed, then $Kcap B$ is compact so you can use that; but you say you are not assuming that $A$ is closed.
    – bof
    Jul 20 at 3:36
















  • This question was answered here math.stackexchange.com/q/1416556/55622. Compare proofs and maybe you can find your mistake.
    – Oliver Jones
    Jul 20 at 0:10










  • Your statement "$forall K$ compact of $X$ it happens that $Bcap K$ is closed in $K$" does not seem to follow from anything stated previously.
    – bof
    Jul 20 at 0:25










  • what I would like to show is that $B$ is a $k$-closed of $X$ to use the hypothesis that $X$ is a $k$-space and conclude that $B$ is closed in $X$ and then use the paragraph that says finally in my demonstration. But to see that $B$ is a $k$-closed in $X$, I need to see that for all compact $K$ of $X$ (not compact in $A$) the intersection $Bcap K$ is closed in $K$ and according to me that's where I use that compactness is an absolute property.
    – Israel
    Jul 20 at 3:27







  • 1




    Suppose $K$ is a compact subset of $X,$ how do you know that $Bcap K$ is closed in $K?$ If $Ksubset A$ then $K$ is a compact subset of $A,$ so you can use the fact that $B$ is $k$-closed in $A;$ but what if $Knotsubset A?$
    – bof
    Jul 20 at 3:32











  • Now, if $A$ happens to be closed, then $Kcap B$ is compact so you can use that; but you say you are not assuming that $A$ is closed.
    – bof
    Jul 20 at 3:36















This question was answered here math.stackexchange.com/q/1416556/55622. Compare proofs and maybe you can find your mistake.
– Oliver Jones
Jul 20 at 0:10




This question was answered here math.stackexchange.com/q/1416556/55622. Compare proofs and maybe you can find your mistake.
– Oliver Jones
Jul 20 at 0:10












Your statement "$forall K$ compact of $X$ it happens that $Bcap K$ is closed in $K$" does not seem to follow from anything stated previously.
– bof
Jul 20 at 0:25




Your statement "$forall K$ compact of $X$ it happens that $Bcap K$ is closed in $K$" does not seem to follow from anything stated previously.
– bof
Jul 20 at 0:25












what I would like to show is that $B$ is a $k$-closed of $X$ to use the hypothesis that $X$ is a $k$-space and conclude that $B$ is closed in $X$ and then use the paragraph that says finally in my demonstration. But to see that $B$ is a $k$-closed in $X$, I need to see that for all compact $K$ of $X$ (not compact in $A$) the intersection $Bcap K$ is closed in $K$ and according to me that's where I use that compactness is an absolute property.
– Israel
Jul 20 at 3:27





what I would like to show is that $B$ is a $k$-closed of $X$ to use the hypothesis that $X$ is a $k$-space and conclude that $B$ is closed in $X$ and then use the paragraph that says finally in my demonstration. But to see that $B$ is a $k$-closed in $X$, I need to see that for all compact $K$ of $X$ (not compact in $A$) the intersection $Bcap K$ is closed in $K$ and according to me that's where I use that compactness is an absolute property.
– Israel
Jul 20 at 3:27





1




1




Suppose $K$ is a compact subset of $X,$ how do you know that $Bcap K$ is closed in $K?$ If $Ksubset A$ then $K$ is a compact subset of $A,$ so you can use the fact that $B$ is $k$-closed in $A;$ but what if $Knotsubset A?$
– bof
Jul 20 at 3:32





Suppose $K$ is a compact subset of $X,$ how do you know that $Bcap K$ is closed in $K?$ If $Ksubset A$ then $K$ is a compact subset of $A,$ so you can use the fact that $B$ is $k$-closed in $A;$ but what if $Knotsubset A?$
– bof
Jul 20 at 3:32













Now, if $A$ happens to be closed, then $Kcap B$ is compact so you can use that; but you say you are not assuming that $A$ is closed.
– bof
Jul 20 at 3:36




Now, if $A$ happens to be closed, then $Kcap B$ is compact so you can use that; but you say you are not assuming that $A$ is closed.
– bof
Jul 20 at 3:36















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2857141%2fis-a-subspace-of-a-k-space-is-a-k-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2857141%2fis-a-subspace-of-a-k-space-is-a-k-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?