Prove: $log_2(x)+log_x(y)+log_y(8)geq sqrt[3]81$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite













Prove that for every $x$,$y$ greater than $1$:
$$log_2(x)+log_x(y)+log_y(8)geq sqrt[3]81$$




What I've tried has got me to:



$$fraclog_y(x)log_y(2)+log_x(y)+3log_y(2)geq sqrt[3]81$$



I didn't really get far.. I can't see where I can go from here, especially not what to do with $ sqrt[3]81$.



This is taken out of the maths entry tests for TAU, so this shouldn't be too hard.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • $log_xy=frac1log_yx$
    – MalayTheDynamo
    Jul 16 at 19:04











  • A neat thing about $log_a b = frac 1log_b a$ and $frac log_b clog_b a = log_a c$.... It means $log_a b* log_b c = log_a c$ and so $log_a b*log_b c* log_c d*....... *log_y z = log_a z$......
    – fleablood
    Jul 16 at 19:40














up vote
2
down vote

favorite













Prove that for every $x$,$y$ greater than $1$:
$$log_2(x)+log_x(y)+log_y(8)geq sqrt[3]81$$




What I've tried has got me to:



$$fraclog_y(x)log_y(2)+log_x(y)+3log_y(2)geq sqrt[3]81$$



I didn't really get far.. I can't see where I can go from here, especially not what to do with $ sqrt[3]81$.



This is taken out of the maths entry tests for TAU, so this shouldn't be too hard.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • $log_xy=frac1log_yx$
    – MalayTheDynamo
    Jul 16 at 19:04











  • A neat thing about $log_a b = frac 1log_b a$ and $frac log_b clog_b a = log_a c$.... It means $log_a b* log_b c = log_a c$ and so $log_a b*log_b c* log_c d*....... *log_y z = log_a z$......
    – fleablood
    Jul 16 at 19:40












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Prove that for every $x$,$y$ greater than $1$:
$$log_2(x)+log_x(y)+log_y(8)geq sqrt[3]81$$




What I've tried has got me to:



$$fraclog_y(x)log_y(2)+log_x(y)+3log_y(2)geq sqrt[3]81$$



I didn't really get far.. I can't see where I can go from here, especially not what to do with $ sqrt[3]81$.



This is taken out of the maths entry tests for TAU, so this shouldn't be too hard.







share|cite|improve this question














Prove that for every $x$,$y$ greater than $1$:
$$log_2(x)+log_x(y)+log_y(8)geq sqrt[3]81$$




What I've tried has got me to:



$$fraclog_y(x)log_y(2)+log_x(y)+3log_y(2)geq sqrt[3]81$$



I didn't really get far.. I can't see where I can go from here, especially not what to do with $ sqrt[3]81$.



This is taken out of the maths entry tests for TAU, so this shouldn't be too hard.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 16 at 19:11









TheSimpliFire

9,70861951




9,70861951









asked Jul 16 at 19:01









Maxim

616314




616314











  • $log_xy=frac1log_yx$
    – MalayTheDynamo
    Jul 16 at 19:04











  • A neat thing about $log_a b = frac 1log_b a$ and $frac log_b clog_b a = log_a c$.... It means $log_a b* log_b c = log_a c$ and so $log_a b*log_b c* log_c d*....... *log_y z = log_a z$......
    – fleablood
    Jul 16 at 19:40
















  • $log_xy=frac1log_yx$
    – MalayTheDynamo
    Jul 16 at 19:04











  • A neat thing about $log_a b = frac 1log_b a$ and $frac log_b clog_b a = log_a c$.... It means $log_a b* log_b c = log_a c$ and so $log_a b*log_b c* log_c d*....... *log_y z = log_a z$......
    – fleablood
    Jul 16 at 19:40















$log_xy=frac1log_yx$
– MalayTheDynamo
Jul 16 at 19:04





$log_xy=frac1log_yx$
– MalayTheDynamo
Jul 16 at 19:04













A neat thing about $log_a b = frac 1log_b a$ and $frac log_b clog_b a = log_a c$.... It means $log_a b* log_b c = log_a c$ and so $log_a b*log_b c* log_c d*....... *log_y z = log_a z$......
– fleablood
Jul 16 at 19:40




A neat thing about $log_a b = frac 1log_b a$ and $frac log_b clog_b a = log_a c$.... It means $log_a b* log_b c = log_a c$ and so $log_a b*log_b c* log_c d*....... *log_y z = log_a z$......
– fleablood
Jul 16 at 19:40










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










We have $$log_2x+log_xy+log_y8=fraclog xlog2+fraclog ylog x+frac3log2log y$$



and since $2,x,y>1$, we can deduce that their logarithms are non-negative, and so will their quotients.



Now use AM-GM:



$$sqrt[3]fraclog xlog2cdotfraclog ylog xcdotfrac3log2log ylefracfraclog xlog2+fraclog ylog x+frac3log2log y3$$ giving $$fraclog xlog2+fraclog ylog x+frac3log2log yge3sqrt[3]3=sqrt[3]81$$ as required.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • While I did all these logarithmic exercises, I noticed that the AM-GM is actually a very common technique for the solution. Is there any reason for that or is it just a coincudence?
    – Maxim
    Jul 17 at 12:41










  • @Maxim AM-GM is usually the second inequality that people learn (after $x^2 ge 0$). So it's a good choice to use when writing a problem for an entrance exam, because many people are familiar with it.
    – Ovi
    Jul 17 at 17:37










  • @Ovi That's embarrassing. I learned about AM/GM/HM just last week :)
    – TheSimpliFire
    Jul 17 at 19:22











  • @TheSimpliFire Don't feel embarrased, I'm not saying that most people know about and how to use AM-GM. I'm saying that of the people who know inequalities, most know AM-GM; so if they put an inequality question, AM-GM is a good problem. However, the question of weather they should put inequalities questions is separate.
    – Ovi
    Jul 17 at 21:39

















up vote
5
down vote













Let's convert everything to $log$ base $2$ so we have a common something to work with:



$$log_2 x + dfrac log_2 ylog_2 x + dfrac log_2 8log_2 y ge sqrt [3]81 = 3 sqrt[3]3$$



Now let $a = log_2 x$ and $b = log_2 y$. The condition $x, y > 1$ implies that $a, b > 0$. So now we have to prove



$$a + dfrac ab + dfrac 3b ge3 sqrt[3]3$$



The cube root in there especially may remind us of AM-GM with $3$ terms. And indeed, the inequality $textAMleft(a, dfrac ab, dfrac 3bright) ge textGMleft(a, dfrac ab, dfrac 3bright)$ gives exactly what is desired.






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Hint: Show that $a+fracba+frac3bgeq sqrt[3]81$ for all $a,b>0$, using AM-GM.






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Two things:



      $log_a b = frac 1log_b a$ and $frac log_b clog_b a = log_a c$ so $log_a blog_b c = frac log_b clog_b a = log_a c$.



      And AM-GM says $frac a + b+ c3 ge sqrt[3]abc$.



      So.....



      $frac log_2 x + log_x y + log_y 83 ge sqrt[3]log_2 x log_x y log_y 8 = sqrt[3]log_2 8$






      share|cite|improve this answer























        Your Answer




        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: false,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );








         

        draft saved


        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2853732%2fprove-log-2x-log-xy-log-y8-geq-sqrt381%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest






























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        3
        down vote



        accepted










        We have $$log_2x+log_xy+log_y8=fraclog xlog2+fraclog ylog x+frac3log2log y$$



        and since $2,x,y>1$, we can deduce that their logarithms are non-negative, and so will their quotients.



        Now use AM-GM:



        $$sqrt[3]fraclog xlog2cdotfraclog ylog xcdotfrac3log2log ylefracfraclog xlog2+fraclog ylog x+frac3log2log y3$$ giving $$fraclog xlog2+fraclog ylog x+frac3log2log yge3sqrt[3]3=sqrt[3]81$$ as required.






        share|cite|improve this answer























        • While I did all these logarithmic exercises, I noticed that the AM-GM is actually a very common technique for the solution. Is there any reason for that or is it just a coincudence?
          – Maxim
          Jul 17 at 12:41










        • @Maxim AM-GM is usually the second inequality that people learn (after $x^2 ge 0$). So it's a good choice to use when writing a problem for an entrance exam, because many people are familiar with it.
          – Ovi
          Jul 17 at 17:37










        • @Ovi That's embarrassing. I learned about AM/GM/HM just last week :)
          – TheSimpliFire
          Jul 17 at 19:22











        • @TheSimpliFire Don't feel embarrased, I'm not saying that most people know about and how to use AM-GM. I'm saying that of the people who know inequalities, most know AM-GM; so if they put an inequality question, AM-GM is a good problem. However, the question of weather they should put inequalities questions is separate.
          – Ovi
          Jul 17 at 21:39














        up vote
        3
        down vote



        accepted










        We have $$log_2x+log_xy+log_y8=fraclog xlog2+fraclog ylog x+frac3log2log y$$



        and since $2,x,y>1$, we can deduce that their logarithms are non-negative, and so will their quotients.



        Now use AM-GM:



        $$sqrt[3]fraclog xlog2cdotfraclog ylog xcdotfrac3log2log ylefracfraclog xlog2+fraclog ylog x+frac3log2log y3$$ giving $$fraclog xlog2+fraclog ylog x+frac3log2log yge3sqrt[3]3=sqrt[3]81$$ as required.






        share|cite|improve this answer























        • While I did all these logarithmic exercises, I noticed that the AM-GM is actually a very common technique for the solution. Is there any reason for that or is it just a coincudence?
          – Maxim
          Jul 17 at 12:41










        • @Maxim AM-GM is usually the second inequality that people learn (after $x^2 ge 0$). So it's a good choice to use when writing a problem for an entrance exam, because many people are familiar with it.
          – Ovi
          Jul 17 at 17:37










        • @Ovi That's embarrassing. I learned about AM/GM/HM just last week :)
          – TheSimpliFire
          Jul 17 at 19:22











        • @TheSimpliFire Don't feel embarrased, I'm not saying that most people know about and how to use AM-GM. I'm saying that of the people who know inequalities, most know AM-GM; so if they put an inequality question, AM-GM is a good problem. However, the question of weather they should put inequalities questions is separate.
          – Ovi
          Jul 17 at 21:39












        up vote
        3
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        3
        down vote



        accepted






        We have $$log_2x+log_xy+log_y8=fraclog xlog2+fraclog ylog x+frac3log2log y$$



        and since $2,x,y>1$, we can deduce that their logarithms are non-negative, and so will their quotients.



        Now use AM-GM:



        $$sqrt[3]fraclog xlog2cdotfraclog ylog xcdotfrac3log2log ylefracfraclog xlog2+fraclog ylog x+frac3log2log y3$$ giving $$fraclog xlog2+fraclog ylog x+frac3log2log yge3sqrt[3]3=sqrt[3]81$$ as required.






        share|cite|improve this answer















        We have $$log_2x+log_xy+log_y8=fraclog xlog2+fraclog ylog x+frac3log2log y$$



        and since $2,x,y>1$, we can deduce that their logarithms are non-negative, and so will their quotients.



        Now use AM-GM:



        $$sqrt[3]fraclog xlog2cdotfraclog ylog xcdotfrac3log2log ylefracfraclog xlog2+fraclog ylog x+frac3log2log y3$$ giving $$fraclog xlog2+fraclog ylog x+frac3log2log yge3sqrt[3]3=sqrt[3]81$$ as required.







        share|cite|improve this answer















        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jul 16 at 19:15


























        answered Jul 16 at 19:10









        TheSimpliFire

        9,70861951




        9,70861951











        • While I did all these logarithmic exercises, I noticed that the AM-GM is actually a very common technique for the solution. Is there any reason for that or is it just a coincudence?
          – Maxim
          Jul 17 at 12:41










        • @Maxim AM-GM is usually the second inequality that people learn (after $x^2 ge 0$). So it's a good choice to use when writing a problem for an entrance exam, because many people are familiar with it.
          – Ovi
          Jul 17 at 17:37










        • @Ovi That's embarrassing. I learned about AM/GM/HM just last week :)
          – TheSimpliFire
          Jul 17 at 19:22











        • @TheSimpliFire Don't feel embarrased, I'm not saying that most people know about and how to use AM-GM. I'm saying that of the people who know inequalities, most know AM-GM; so if they put an inequality question, AM-GM is a good problem. However, the question of weather they should put inequalities questions is separate.
          – Ovi
          Jul 17 at 21:39
















        • While I did all these logarithmic exercises, I noticed that the AM-GM is actually a very common technique for the solution. Is there any reason for that or is it just a coincudence?
          – Maxim
          Jul 17 at 12:41










        • @Maxim AM-GM is usually the second inequality that people learn (after $x^2 ge 0$). So it's a good choice to use when writing a problem for an entrance exam, because many people are familiar with it.
          – Ovi
          Jul 17 at 17:37










        • @Ovi That's embarrassing. I learned about AM/GM/HM just last week :)
          – TheSimpliFire
          Jul 17 at 19:22











        • @TheSimpliFire Don't feel embarrased, I'm not saying that most people know about and how to use AM-GM. I'm saying that of the people who know inequalities, most know AM-GM; so if they put an inequality question, AM-GM is a good problem. However, the question of weather they should put inequalities questions is separate.
          – Ovi
          Jul 17 at 21:39















        While I did all these logarithmic exercises, I noticed that the AM-GM is actually a very common technique for the solution. Is there any reason for that or is it just a coincudence?
        – Maxim
        Jul 17 at 12:41




        While I did all these logarithmic exercises, I noticed that the AM-GM is actually a very common technique for the solution. Is there any reason for that or is it just a coincudence?
        – Maxim
        Jul 17 at 12:41












        @Maxim AM-GM is usually the second inequality that people learn (after $x^2 ge 0$). So it's a good choice to use when writing a problem for an entrance exam, because many people are familiar with it.
        – Ovi
        Jul 17 at 17:37




        @Maxim AM-GM is usually the second inequality that people learn (after $x^2 ge 0$). So it's a good choice to use when writing a problem for an entrance exam, because many people are familiar with it.
        – Ovi
        Jul 17 at 17:37












        @Ovi That's embarrassing. I learned about AM/GM/HM just last week :)
        – TheSimpliFire
        Jul 17 at 19:22





        @Ovi That's embarrassing. I learned about AM/GM/HM just last week :)
        – TheSimpliFire
        Jul 17 at 19:22













        @TheSimpliFire Don't feel embarrased, I'm not saying that most people know about and how to use AM-GM. I'm saying that of the people who know inequalities, most know AM-GM; so if they put an inequality question, AM-GM is a good problem. However, the question of weather they should put inequalities questions is separate.
        – Ovi
        Jul 17 at 21:39




        @TheSimpliFire Don't feel embarrased, I'm not saying that most people know about and how to use AM-GM. I'm saying that of the people who know inequalities, most know AM-GM; so if they put an inequality question, AM-GM is a good problem. However, the question of weather they should put inequalities questions is separate.
        – Ovi
        Jul 17 at 21:39










        up vote
        5
        down vote













        Let's convert everything to $log$ base $2$ so we have a common something to work with:



        $$log_2 x + dfrac log_2 ylog_2 x + dfrac log_2 8log_2 y ge sqrt [3]81 = 3 sqrt[3]3$$



        Now let $a = log_2 x$ and $b = log_2 y$. The condition $x, y > 1$ implies that $a, b > 0$. So now we have to prove



        $$a + dfrac ab + dfrac 3b ge3 sqrt[3]3$$



        The cube root in there especially may remind us of AM-GM with $3$ terms. And indeed, the inequality $textAMleft(a, dfrac ab, dfrac 3bright) ge textGMleft(a, dfrac ab, dfrac 3bright)$ gives exactly what is desired.






        share|cite|improve this answer



























          up vote
          5
          down vote













          Let's convert everything to $log$ base $2$ so we have a common something to work with:



          $$log_2 x + dfrac log_2 ylog_2 x + dfrac log_2 8log_2 y ge sqrt [3]81 = 3 sqrt[3]3$$



          Now let $a = log_2 x$ and $b = log_2 y$. The condition $x, y > 1$ implies that $a, b > 0$. So now we have to prove



          $$a + dfrac ab + dfrac 3b ge3 sqrt[3]3$$



          The cube root in there especially may remind us of AM-GM with $3$ terms. And indeed, the inequality $textAMleft(a, dfrac ab, dfrac 3bright) ge textGMleft(a, dfrac ab, dfrac 3bright)$ gives exactly what is desired.






          share|cite|improve this answer

























            up vote
            5
            down vote










            up vote
            5
            down vote









            Let's convert everything to $log$ base $2$ so we have a common something to work with:



            $$log_2 x + dfrac log_2 ylog_2 x + dfrac log_2 8log_2 y ge sqrt [3]81 = 3 sqrt[3]3$$



            Now let $a = log_2 x$ and $b = log_2 y$. The condition $x, y > 1$ implies that $a, b > 0$. So now we have to prove



            $$a + dfrac ab + dfrac 3b ge3 sqrt[3]3$$



            The cube root in there especially may remind us of AM-GM with $3$ terms. And indeed, the inequality $textAMleft(a, dfrac ab, dfrac 3bright) ge textGMleft(a, dfrac ab, dfrac 3bright)$ gives exactly what is desired.






            share|cite|improve this answer















            Let's convert everything to $log$ base $2$ so we have a common something to work with:



            $$log_2 x + dfrac log_2 ylog_2 x + dfrac log_2 8log_2 y ge sqrt [3]81 = 3 sqrt[3]3$$



            Now let $a = log_2 x$ and $b = log_2 y$. The condition $x, y > 1$ implies that $a, b > 0$. So now we have to prove



            $$a + dfrac ab + dfrac 3b ge3 sqrt[3]3$$



            The cube root in there especially may remind us of AM-GM with $3$ terms. And indeed, the inequality $textAMleft(a, dfrac ab, dfrac 3bright) ge textGMleft(a, dfrac ab, dfrac 3bright)$ gives exactly what is desired.







            share|cite|improve this answer















            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Jul 16 at 19:15


























            answered Jul 16 at 19:11









            Ovi

            11.3k935105




            11.3k935105




















                up vote
                2
                down vote













                Hint: Show that $a+fracba+frac3bgeq sqrt[3]81$ for all $a,b>0$, using AM-GM.






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote













                  Hint: Show that $a+fracba+frac3bgeq sqrt[3]81$ for all $a,b>0$, using AM-GM.






                  share|cite|improve this answer























                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote









                    Hint: Show that $a+fracba+frac3bgeq sqrt[3]81$ for all $a,b>0$, using AM-GM.






                    share|cite|improve this answer













                    Hint: Show that $a+fracba+frac3bgeq sqrt[3]81$ for all $a,b>0$, using AM-GM.







                    share|cite|improve this answer













                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    answered Jul 16 at 19:05









                    Batominovski

                    23.2k22777




                    23.2k22777




















                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        Two things:



                        $log_a b = frac 1log_b a$ and $frac log_b clog_b a = log_a c$ so $log_a blog_b c = frac log_b clog_b a = log_a c$.



                        And AM-GM says $frac a + b+ c3 ge sqrt[3]abc$.



                        So.....



                        $frac log_2 x + log_x y + log_y 83 ge sqrt[3]log_2 x log_x y log_y 8 = sqrt[3]log_2 8$






                        share|cite|improve this answer



























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote













                          Two things:



                          $log_a b = frac 1log_b a$ and $frac log_b clog_b a = log_a c$ so $log_a blog_b c = frac log_b clog_b a = log_a c$.



                          And AM-GM says $frac a + b+ c3 ge sqrt[3]abc$.



                          So.....



                          $frac log_2 x + log_x y + log_y 83 ge sqrt[3]log_2 x log_x y log_y 8 = sqrt[3]log_2 8$






                          share|cite|improve this answer

























                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote









                            Two things:



                            $log_a b = frac 1log_b a$ and $frac log_b clog_b a = log_a c$ so $log_a blog_b c = frac log_b clog_b a = log_a c$.



                            And AM-GM says $frac a + b+ c3 ge sqrt[3]abc$.



                            So.....



                            $frac log_2 x + log_x y + log_y 83 ge sqrt[3]log_2 x log_x y log_y 8 = sqrt[3]log_2 8$






                            share|cite|improve this answer















                            Two things:



                            $log_a b = frac 1log_b a$ and $frac log_b clog_b a = log_a c$ so $log_a blog_b c = frac log_b clog_b a = log_a c$.



                            And AM-GM says $frac a + b+ c3 ge sqrt[3]abc$.



                            So.....



                            $frac log_2 x + log_x y + log_y 83 ge sqrt[3]log_2 x log_x y log_y 8 = sqrt[3]log_2 8$







                            share|cite|improve this answer















                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            edited Jul 16 at 19:45


























                            answered Jul 16 at 19:37









                            fleablood

                            60.5k22575




                            60.5k22575






















                                 

                                draft saved


                                draft discarded


























                                 


                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2853732%2fprove-log-2x-log-xy-log-y8-geq-sqrt381%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest













































































                                Comments

                                Popular posts from this blog

                                What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                                Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                                Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?