Calculating variance of an estimator

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Given that $ operatornameVar(x)=frac34theta^2$, I want t find the variance of estimator $hattheta_1 = frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i$. EDIT: $X_1,...,X_n$ are independent and identically distributed (iid)



I proceed as follows:



$$ operatornameVar(hattheta) = operatornameVar(frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i)=frac49 frac1n operatornameVar(X_1)= frac49 frac1n frac34 theta^2 = frac13ntheta^2 $$



or



$$ operatornameVar(hattheta) = operatornameVar(frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i)= operatornameVar(frac2n3nX_1)= operatornameVar(frac23X_1)=frac49 frac34theta^2 = frac13theta^2 $$



Our professor provided us with the solution, so I know the first approach is the correct one, however i do not understand what is wrong with the second approach?







share|cite|improve this question





















  • Is the first one really correct? It seems to me that he claims $textVar(sum_i X_i) = ntextVar(X_1)$ (2nd =). Then, 3rd and 4th = are clearly wrong.
    – Antoine
    Jul 30 at 8:38











  • $X_i, ..., X_n$ are iid...forgot to mention. Then $Var(sum_iX_i )= nVar(X_1)$, right?
    – user1607
    Jul 30 at 8:44











  • I count lots of mistakes in this. E.g. do we really have $frac4n^29n=frac4n$?
    – drhab
    Jul 30 at 8:45










  • @Antoine Sorry, but you are wrong. And probably the $X_i$ are meant to be independent (which should have been mentioned in the question). The variance of a sum of independent random variables equals the sum of variances.
    – drhab
    Jul 30 at 8:49










  • I appologize, i made mistakes when writing the questions and fixed them after they were poited out.
    – user1607
    Jul 30 at 8:56














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Given that $ operatornameVar(x)=frac34theta^2$, I want t find the variance of estimator $hattheta_1 = frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i$. EDIT: $X_1,...,X_n$ are independent and identically distributed (iid)



I proceed as follows:



$$ operatornameVar(hattheta) = operatornameVar(frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i)=frac49 frac1n operatornameVar(X_1)= frac49 frac1n frac34 theta^2 = frac13ntheta^2 $$



or



$$ operatornameVar(hattheta) = operatornameVar(frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i)= operatornameVar(frac2n3nX_1)= operatornameVar(frac23X_1)=frac49 frac34theta^2 = frac13theta^2 $$



Our professor provided us with the solution, so I know the first approach is the correct one, however i do not understand what is wrong with the second approach?







share|cite|improve this question





















  • Is the first one really correct? It seems to me that he claims $textVar(sum_i X_i) = ntextVar(X_1)$ (2nd =). Then, 3rd and 4th = are clearly wrong.
    – Antoine
    Jul 30 at 8:38











  • $X_i, ..., X_n$ are iid...forgot to mention. Then $Var(sum_iX_i )= nVar(X_1)$, right?
    – user1607
    Jul 30 at 8:44











  • I count lots of mistakes in this. E.g. do we really have $frac4n^29n=frac4n$?
    – drhab
    Jul 30 at 8:45










  • @Antoine Sorry, but you are wrong. And probably the $X_i$ are meant to be independent (which should have been mentioned in the question). The variance of a sum of independent random variables equals the sum of variances.
    – drhab
    Jul 30 at 8:49










  • I appologize, i made mistakes when writing the questions and fixed them after they were poited out.
    – user1607
    Jul 30 at 8:56












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Given that $ operatornameVar(x)=frac34theta^2$, I want t find the variance of estimator $hattheta_1 = frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i$. EDIT: $X_1,...,X_n$ are independent and identically distributed (iid)



I proceed as follows:



$$ operatornameVar(hattheta) = operatornameVar(frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i)=frac49 frac1n operatornameVar(X_1)= frac49 frac1n frac34 theta^2 = frac13ntheta^2 $$



or



$$ operatornameVar(hattheta) = operatornameVar(frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i)= operatornameVar(frac2n3nX_1)= operatornameVar(frac23X_1)=frac49 frac34theta^2 = frac13theta^2 $$



Our professor provided us with the solution, so I know the first approach is the correct one, however i do not understand what is wrong with the second approach?







share|cite|improve this question













Given that $ operatornameVar(x)=frac34theta^2$, I want t find the variance of estimator $hattheta_1 = frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i$. EDIT: $X_1,...,X_n$ are independent and identically distributed (iid)



I proceed as follows:



$$ operatornameVar(hattheta) = operatornameVar(frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i)=frac49 frac1n operatornameVar(X_1)= frac49 frac1n frac34 theta^2 = frac13ntheta^2 $$



or



$$ operatornameVar(hattheta) = operatornameVar(frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i)= operatornameVar(frac2n3nX_1)= operatornameVar(frac23X_1)=frac49 frac34theta^2 = frac13theta^2 $$



Our professor provided us with the solution, so I know the first approach is the correct one, however i do not understand what is wrong with the second approach?









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 30 at 8:55
























asked Jul 30 at 8:34









user1607

608




608











  • Is the first one really correct? It seems to me that he claims $textVar(sum_i X_i) = ntextVar(X_1)$ (2nd =). Then, 3rd and 4th = are clearly wrong.
    – Antoine
    Jul 30 at 8:38











  • $X_i, ..., X_n$ are iid...forgot to mention. Then $Var(sum_iX_i )= nVar(X_1)$, right?
    – user1607
    Jul 30 at 8:44











  • I count lots of mistakes in this. E.g. do we really have $frac4n^29n=frac4n$?
    – drhab
    Jul 30 at 8:45










  • @Antoine Sorry, but you are wrong. And probably the $X_i$ are meant to be independent (which should have been mentioned in the question). The variance of a sum of independent random variables equals the sum of variances.
    – drhab
    Jul 30 at 8:49










  • I appologize, i made mistakes when writing the questions and fixed them after they were poited out.
    – user1607
    Jul 30 at 8:56
















  • Is the first one really correct? It seems to me that he claims $textVar(sum_i X_i) = ntextVar(X_1)$ (2nd =). Then, 3rd and 4th = are clearly wrong.
    – Antoine
    Jul 30 at 8:38











  • $X_i, ..., X_n$ are iid...forgot to mention. Then $Var(sum_iX_i )= nVar(X_1)$, right?
    – user1607
    Jul 30 at 8:44











  • I count lots of mistakes in this. E.g. do we really have $frac4n^29n=frac4n$?
    – drhab
    Jul 30 at 8:45










  • @Antoine Sorry, but you are wrong. And probably the $X_i$ are meant to be independent (which should have been mentioned in the question). The variance of a sum of independent random variables equals the sum of variances.
    – drhab
    Jul 30 at 8:49










  • I appologize, i made mistakes when writing the questions and fixed them after they were poited out.
    – user1607
    Jul 30 at 8:56















Is the first one really correct? It seems to me that he claims $textVar(sum_i X_i) = ntextVar(X_1)$ (2nd =). Then, 3rd and 4th = are clearly wrong.
– Antoine
Jul 30 at 8:38





Is the first one really correct? It seems to me that he claims $textVar(sum_i X_i) = ntextVar(X_1)$ (2nd =). Then, 3rd and 4th = are clearly wrong.
– Antoine
Jul 30 at 8:38













$X_i, ..., X_n$ are iid...forgot to mention. Then $Var(sum_iX_i )= nVar(X_1)$, right?
– user1607
Jul 30 at 8:44





$X_i, ..., X_n$ are iid...forgot to mention. Then $Var(sum_iX_i )= nVar(X_1)$, right?
– user1607
Jul 30 at 8:44













I count lots of mistakes in this. E.g. do we really have $frac4n^29n=frac4n$?
– drhab
Jul 30 at 8:45




I count lots of mistakes in this. E.g. do we really have $frac4n^29n=frac4n$?
– drhab
Jul 30 at 8:45












@Antoine Sorry, but you are wrong. And probably the $X_i$ are meant to be independent (which should have been mentioned in the question). The variance of a sum of independent random variables equals the sum of variances.
– drhab
Jul 30 at 8:49




@Antoine Sorry, but you are wrong. And probably the $X_i$ are meant to be independent (which should have been mentioned in the question). The variance of a sum of independent random variables equals the sum of variances.
– drhab
Jul 30 at 8:49












I appologize, i made mistakes when writing the questions and fixed them after they were poited out.
– user1607
Jul 30 at 8:56




I appologize, i made mistakes when writing the questions and fixed them after they were poited out.
– user1607
Jul 30 at 8:56










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Both approaches seem to be problematic in my view with the second being worse than the first because there is no reason why your equalities should hold. The first approach only has the problem of lacking correct calculations with rational numbers as far as I can tell.



The identity
$$Var(frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i) = frac4n^29n Var(X_1)$$
is correct (if we assume that the $X_1, dots, X_n$ are independent and identically distributed), since $Var(alpha X) = alpha^2 Var(X)$ for any constant $alpha$ and $Var(X + Y) = Var(X) + Var(Y)$ for independent $X$ and $Y$.



However,
$$frac4n^29n Var(X_1)=frac4 n^39Var(X_1) $$
and not $frac4 nVar(X_1)$ or $frac4 9 nVar(X_1)$ (how are the $n$ supposed to cancel?)



You should now try to plug in $Var(X_1) = frac34 theta^2$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • What is wrong with $Var(frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i) = frac4n^29 Var (sum_i=1^n X_i) = frac4n^29 Var(nX_1)= frac4n^29 n^2 Var(X_1) $ ?
    – user1607
    Jul 30 at 9:05










  • It is not true that $Var(sum_i X_i) = Var(n X_1)$. For example if $n = 2$. Then your equation would read $Var(X_1 + X_2) = Var(2 X_1) = 4 Var(X_1)$ which is not correct. Instead you have $Var(X_1 + X_2) = Var(X_1) + Var(X_2) = 2 Var(X_1)$.
    – Matthias Klupsch
    Jul 30 at 9:06











  • thanks for the clarification. So then: $$ Var(hattheta)= frac4n^39Var(X_1)= frac 4n^39 frac34 theta^2 = fracn^33theta^2$$
    – user1607
    Jul 30 at 12:04











  • Yes that's correct.
    – Matthias Klupsch
    Jul 30 at 12:22










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2866781%2fcalculating-variance-of-an-estimator%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Both approaches seem to be problematic in my view with the second being worse than the first because there is no reason why your equalities should hold. The first approach only has the problem of lacking correct calculations with rational numbers as far as I can tell.



The identity
$$Var(frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i) = frac4n^29n Var(X_1)$$
is correct (if we assume that the $X_1, dots, X_n$ are independent and identically distributed), since $Var(alpha X) = alpha^2 Var(X)$ for any constant $alpha$ and $Var(X + Y) = Var(X) + Var(Y)$ for independent $X$ and $Y$.



However,
$$frac4n^29n Var(X_1)=frac4 n^39Var(X_1) $$
and not $frac4 nVar(X_1)$ or $frac4 9 nVar(X_1)$ (how are the $n$ supposed to cancel?)



You should now try to plug in $Var(X_1) = frac34 theta^2$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • What is wrong with $Var(frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i) = frac4n^29 Var (sum_i=1^n X_i) = frac4n^29 Var(nX_1)= frac4n^29 n^2 Var(X_1) $ ?
    – user1607
    Jul 30 at 9:05










  • It is not true that $Var(sum_i X_i) = Var(n X_1)$. For example if $n = 2$. Then your equation would read $Var(X_1 + X_2) = Var(2 X_1) = 4 Var(X_1)$ which is not correct. Instead you have $Var(X_1 + X_2) = Var(X_1) + Var(X_2) = 2 Var(X_1)$.
    – Matthias Klupsch
    Jul 30 at 9:06











  • thanks for the clarification. So then: $$ Var(hattheta)= frac4n^39Var(X_1)= frac 4n^39 frac34 theta^2 = fracn^33theta^2$$
    – user1607
    Jul 30 at 12:04











  • Yes that's correct.
    – Matthias Klupsch
    Jul 30 at 12:22














up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Both approaches seem to be problematic in my view with the second being worse than the first because there is no reason why your equalities should hold. The first approach only has the problem of lacking correct calculations with rational numbers as far as I can tell.



The identity
$$Var(frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i) = frac4n^29n Var(X_1)$$
is correct (if we assume that the $X_1, dots, X_n$ are independent and identically distributed), since $Var(alpha X) = alpha^2 Var(X)$ for any constant $alpha$ and $Var(X + Y) = Var(X) + Var(Y)$ for independent $X$ and $Y$.



However,
$$frac4n^29n Var(X_1)=frac4 n^39Var(X_1) $$
and not $frac4 nVar(X_1)$ or $frac4 9 nVar(X_1)$ (how are the $n$ supposed to cancel?)



You should now try to plug in $Var(X_1) = frac34 theta^2$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • What is wrong with $Var(frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i) = frac4n^29 Var (sum_i=1^n X_i) = frac4n^29 Var(nX_1)= frac4n^29 n^2 Var(X_1) $ ?
    – user1607
    Jul 30 at 9:05










  • It is not true that $Var(sum_i X_i) = Var(n X_1)$. For example if $n = 2$. Then your equation would read $Var(X_1 + X_2) = Var(2 X_1) = 4 Var(X_1)$ which is not correct. Instead you have $Var(X_1 + X_2) = Var(X_1) + Var(X_2) = 2 Var(X_1)$.
    – Matthias Klupsch
    Jul 30 at 9:06











  • thanks for the clarification. So then: $$ Var(hattheta)= frac4n^39Var(X_1)= frac 4n^39 frac34 theta^2 = fracn^33theta^2$$
    – user1607
    Jul 30 at 12:04











  • Yes that's correct.
    – Matthias Klupsch
    Jul 30 at 12:22












up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






Both approaches seem to be problematic in my view with the second being worse than the first because there is no reason why your equalities should hold. The first approach only has the problem of lacking correct calculations with rational numbers as far as I can tell.



The identity
$$Var(frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i) = frac4n^29n Var(X_1)$$
is correct (if we assume that the $X_1, dots, X_n$ are independent and identically distributed), since $Var(alpha X) = alpha^2 Var(X)$ for any constant $alpha$ and $Var(X + Y) = Var(X) + Var(Y)$ for independent $X$ and $Y$.



However,
$$frac4n^29n Var(X_1)=frac4 n^39Var(X_1) $$
and not $frac4 nVar(X_1)$ or $frac4 9 nVar(X_1)$ (how are the $n$ supposed to cancel?)



You should now try to plug in $Var(X_1) = frac34 theta^2$.






share|cite|improve this answer













Both approaches seem to be problematic in my view with the second being worse than the first because there is no reason why your equalities should hold. The first approach only has the problem of lacking correct calculations with rational numbers as far as I can tell.



The identity
$$Var(frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i) = frac4n^29n Var(X_1)$$
is correct (if we assume that the $X_1, dots, X_n$ are independent and identically distributed), since $Var(alpha X) = alpha^2 Var(X)$ for any constant $alpha$ and $Var(X + Y) = Var(X) + Var(Y)$ for independent $X$ and $Y$.



However,
$$frac4n^29n Var(X_1)=frac4 n^39Var(X_1) $$
and not $frac4 nVar(X_1)$ or $frac4 9 nVar(X_1)$ (how are the $n$ supposed to cancel?)



You should now try to plug in $Var(X_1) = frac34 theta^2$.







share|cite|improve this answer













share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer











answered Jul 30 at 8:53









Matthias Klupsch

6,0341127




6,0341127











  • What is wrong with $Var(frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i) = frac4n^29 Var (sum_i=1^n X_i) = frac4n^29 Var(nX_1)= frac4n^29 n^2 Var(X_1) $ ?
    – user1607
    Jul 30 at 9:05










  • It is not true that $Var(sum_i X_i) = Var(n X_1)$. For example if $n = 2$. Then your equation would read $Var(X_1 + X_2) = Var(2 X_1) = 4 Var(X_1)$ which is not correct. Instead you have $Var(X_1 + X_2) = Var(X_1) + Var(X_2) = 2 Var(X_1)$.
    – Matthias Klupsch
    Jul 30 at 9:06











  • thanks for the clarification. So then: $$ Var(hattheta)= frac4n^39Var(X_1)= frac 4n^39 frac34 theta^2 = fracn^33theta^2$$
    – user1607
    Jul 30 at 12:04











  • Yes that's correct.
    – Matthias Klupsch
    Jul 30 at 12:22
















  • What is wrong with $Var(frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i) = frac4n^29 Var (sum_i=1^n X_i) = frac4n^29 Var(nX_1)= frac4n^29 n^2 Var(X_1) $ ?
    – user1607
    Jul 30 at 9:05










  • It is not true that $Var(sum_i X_i) = Var(n X_1)$. For example if $n = 2$. Then your equation would read $Var(X_1 + X_2) = Var(2 X_1) = 4 Var(X_1)$ which is not correct. Instead you have $Var(X_1 + X_2) = Var(X_1) + Var(X_2) = 2 Var(X_1)$.
    – Matthias Klupsch
    Jul 30 at 9:06











  • thanks for the clarification. So then: $$ Var(hattheta)= frac4n^39Var(X_1)= frac 4n^39 frac34 theta^2 = fracn^33theta^2$$
    – user1607
    Jul 30 at 12:04











  • Yes that's correct.
    – Matthias Klupsch
    Jul 30 at 12:22















What is wrong with $Var(frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i) = frac4n^29 Var (sum_i=1^n X_i) = frac4n^29 Var(nX_1)= frac4n^29 n^2 Var(X_1) $ ?
– user1607
Jul 30 at 9:05




What is wrong with $Var(frac2n3sum_i=1^nX_i) = frac4n^29 Var (sum_i=1^n X_i) = frac4n^29 Var(nX_1)= frac4n^29 n^2 Var(X_1) $ ?
– user1607
Jul 30 at 9:05












It is not true that $Var(sum_i X_i) = Var(n X_1)$. For example if $n = 2$. Then your equation would read $Var(X_1 + X_2) = Var(2 X_1) = 4 Var(X_1)$ which is not correct. Instead you have $Var(X_1 + X_2) = Var(X_1) + Var(X_2) = 2 Var(X_1)$.
– Matthias Klupsch
Jul 30 at 9:06





It is not true that $Var(sum_i X_i) = Var(n X_1)$. For example if $n = 2$. Then your equation would read $Var(X_1 + X_2) = Var(2 X_1) = 4 Var(X_1)$ which is not correct. Instead you have $Var(X_1 + X_2) = Var(X_1) + Var(X_2) = 2 Var(X_1)$.
– Matthias Klupsch
Jul 30 at 9:06













thanks for the clarification. So then: $$ Var(hattheta)= frac4n^39Var(X_1)= frac 4n^39 frac34 theta^2 = fracn^33theta^2$$
– user1607
Jul 30 at 12:04





thanks for the clarification. So then: $$ Var(hattheta)= frac4n^39Var(X_1)= frac 4n^39 frac34 theta^2 = fracn^33theta^2$$
– user1607
Jul 30 at 12:04













Yes that's correct.
– Matthias Klupsch
Jul 30 at 12:22




Yes that's correct.
– Matthias Klupsch
Jul 30 at 12:22












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2866781%2fcalculating-variance-of-an-estimator%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon